User talk:FlocciNivis/Archive 6

Latest comment: 4 months ago by Herzi Pinki in topic Category:Turbine_houses
Archive 1 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221029 Freising Cathedral 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:40, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230209 Greenhouse Nymphenburg Palace 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:40, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230209 Nymphenburg Palace 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok.--ArildV 20:10, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230701 St. Nikolaus Peiß 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:02, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230609 Friedhof Werfen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
overexposed, fixable? --Virtual-Pano 22:03, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
  Done I decreased the exposure --FlocciNivis 17:06, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
  Support ok now --Virtual-Pano 22:52, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230628 Botanischer Garten München 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:24, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230314 Cloister Mainz Cathedral 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:50, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the review at Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#September_25,_2023 - I replied there, could you follow up on it please? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) Mike Peel (talk) 20:42, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230318 Stadtlagerhaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 19:58, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230321 Neues Rathaus Hannover 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:40, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221018 Schwalbenschwanzturm Memmingen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:53, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200904 Aachen Cathedral 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Blue CA in windows and too much noise --Poco a poco 07:55, 8 October 2023 (UTC)}
  Done I reduced the noise and CA now --FlocciNivis 17:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:58, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230131 Schloss Fürstenried 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support OK. --C messier 20:58, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221016 Metzgerturm Ulm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
lamp post shouldn't be there --Charlesjsharp 09:21, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Totally agree --Poco a poco 17:53, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
  Done cropped it away now --FlocciNivis 20:13, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:58, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230222 Osttor der Dombefestigung Freising.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:33, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230409 Friedenssäule Georg Brenninger 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:41, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230518 Bahnhofsplatz 7 Wasserburg am Inn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 17:25, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230812 Footbridge Schenkendorfstraße 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:17, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221029 Altöttinger Kapelle Freising 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Tight crop, but otherwise fine. QI imo --ArildV 09:40, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221115 Erlöserkirche Munich 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Overall good quality, just the cross above the portal appears overexposed. As this is a very small area, it is still a quality image to me. --AFBorchert 09:21, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221016 Alter Friedhof Ulm 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:09, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230812 Footbridge Schenkendorfstraße 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:38, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200119St. Matthias Riegelsberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. —VulpesVulpes42 13:56, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220507 BMW Tower 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:08, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20211106 Kultusministerium Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:16, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210925 Staustufe Rehlingen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:40, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210925 Steel plant Dillingen Saar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:15, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Already proposed, isn't it --Velvet 06:18, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:20, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221016 Gänsturm Ulm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support QI for me, the out of focus branch IMHO isn't distracting. --C messier 21:11, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221018 Kempter Tor Memmingen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:36, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230815 BayernLB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support QI for me. --C messier 20:15, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230129 Munich Alter Nordfriedhof 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:28, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230129 Munich Alter Nordfriedhof 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:28, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230129 Munich Alter Nordfriedhof 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:28, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230122 Bayerische Staatskanzlei 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:39, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230518 St. Jakob Wasserburg am Inn 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:39, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180907 Cathedral of St. Michael and St. Gudula Brussels 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:43, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20211119 Haarlemmerstraat 2 Leiden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220319 Staffelsee 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:24, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210821 Saarstahl Völklingen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality, but why black and white? --C messier 20:09, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220410 Magdalenenklause 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit dark, but still good quality. --Kritzolina 12:26, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230314 Zum Römischen Kaiser Mainz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 03:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Frohe Weihnachten

  Happy Holidays, FlocciNivis

Merry Christmas and a happy new year!
Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo!
Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr!

Aristeas (talk) 15:24, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:Turbine_houses

 

Turbine houses has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Herzi Pinki (talk) 12:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "FlocciNivis/Archive 6".