User talk:Halavar/Archive3

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koń mongolski w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:37, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koń mongolski w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:37, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koń mongolski w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:57, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koń mongolski w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 11:07, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koń mongolski w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Brighter areas could be reduced, but QI anyhow --Poco a poco 17:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koń mongolski w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Cccefalon 09:26, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konie mongolskie w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:06, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anne church in Ustroń, Poland. Tower..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Ταπυροι (گپ) 14:24, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 18:12, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budynek Starostwa Powiatowego w Rybniku 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Cccefalon 16:28, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brama Wybrańców w Pszczynie 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 15:21, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krajobraz w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 41.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --JLPC 16:08, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krajobraz w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 36.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please add the geo location. --XRay 10:37, 1 July 2014 (UTC)  Done Geolocation added. --Halavar 11:03, 1 July 2014 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:26, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konie mongolskie w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective/tilted ccw. Slight magenta CA top right. --Cccefalon 10:22, 1 July 2014 (UTC)  Done Both problems fixed. --Halavar 12:20, 1 July 2014 (UTC)>br>Not perfect (slight magenta shine stil there), but can pass as QI IMO --Cccefalon 06:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jurty w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:54, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jurty w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:38, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krajobraz w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 56.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:22, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krajobraz w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 47.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:01, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kampana Tower - citadel within the city walls in Kotor, Montenegro..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:57, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Nicholas church in Perast, Montenegro. Belfry..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope imo. --JLPC (talk) 15:52, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:57, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krajobraz w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 67.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --StudiesWorld 13:47, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krajobraz w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 71.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --StudiesWorld 13:47, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krajobraz w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 63.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Could you improve the sky (overblown imo) ? --JLPC 14:48, 5 July 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. I uploaded new, fixed version, hope it's better now. --Halavar 15:17, 5 July 2014 (UTC) Right : QI imo. --JLPC 10:05, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jedna z głównych ulic miasta w Ułan Bator.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:15, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skała-żółw w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:36, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krajobraz w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 55.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:38, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krajobraz w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 66.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Przy maksymalnym zbliżeniu widać pewne niedoskonałości, ale podoba mi się kompozycja i niebo nie jest tak przepalone jak przy sąsiednich --Pudelek 11:51, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Nawsie, Kościół ewangelicko-augsburski 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Is tilt on the left, see notes--Jacek Halicki 06:17, 26 July 2014 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, but I don't know how to fix this... --Halavar 14:32, 26 July 2014 (UTC) A tilt in cw direction of 0,5 or maybe 0,7 would solve the problem Poco a poco 14:56, 26 July 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. I uploaded new version, hope it's better now. --Halavar 15:15, 26 July 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:21, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Nawsie, Kościół ewangelicko-augsburski 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentCA--Jacek Halicki 10:27, 26 July 2014 (UTC)  Done CA removed. Thanks for the hint. --Halavar 12:02, 26 July 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:31, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na miasto Karakorum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:09, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na miasto Karakorum 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:09, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół św. Jerzego w Puńcowie 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 19:19, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jurta w Karakorum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 11:59, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Pawłowicach 7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:46, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi, What is the problem with the yurt, in VI? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:41, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Owoo w Karakorum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stara stupa Nirwany w Karakorum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I suggest you cut a little bit the bottom and the pole of the left --Jacek Halicki 20:22, 30 July 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. You were right, looks better with crop proposed by you. --Halavar 20:33, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na miasto Karakorum 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na miasto Karakorum 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Reddish CA in the clouds. Compression artefacts in the sky over the hills and houses. Not fixable IMO. --Cccefalon 20:05, 30 July 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review, but I fixed all of the problems mentioned by you, so please look again, because I uploaded new version:) --Halavar 20:27, 30 July 2014 (UTC) Indeed considerably better. --Cccefalon 04:08, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół św. Józefa w Istebnej 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too little free space from the bottom and top, but OK IMO. --Jacek Halicki 08:56, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Raciborzu 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be sharper, but good to go --Poco a poco 20:51, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niebo podczas zachodu słońca w Karakorum 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 20:31, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Słupy energetyczne w Karakorum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:59, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Owoo w Karakorum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It would be QI if it wasn't tilted CCW (see houses on the bg) --Stegop 23:13, 30 July 2014 (UTC) There is also an odd halo around the pan at the top of the center pole. --Generic1139 23:20, 30 July 2014 (UTC) Good quality, therefore QI --Hubertl 12:42, 31 July 2014 (UTC)  Done You both were right, thanks for the hints. I uploaded new version, please taka a look again. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 23:41, 30 July 2014 (UTC) The halo is still there in many places. Did you use a mask to modify the sky - possibly noise reduction? The mask wasn't tight enough around that pan, and didn't include the gap in the yellow ribbon. There is the same issue on the far left above the hills, and there is a right angle white artifact in the first valley from the left. Doing the distortion correction has lost some of the good elements in the left of the pile - you might want to compromise there. --Generic1139 02:44, 31 July 2014 (UTC)  Done Yes, I used a mask to modify the sky. I uploaded new, fixed version. Now image should be all right. --Halavar 09:30, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Raciborzu 8.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit soft, but ok. --Uoaei1 13:45, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Świątynia Dalajlamy 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Spurzem 22:42, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Świątynia Dalajlamy 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality, good composition

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Świątynia Dalajlamy 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:32, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niebo nad budynkami klasztoru Erdene Dzuu 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good. --Generic1139 15:56, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sklep z pamiątkami i muzeum w klasztorze Erdene Dzuu 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Cccefalon 11:31, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turtle Rock (Melchij chad) in Gorkhi-Terelj National Park. Mongolia. View from West..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:13, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Świątynia Dalajlamy 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:20, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Świątynia Dalajlamy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:33, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niebo nad budynkami klasztoru Erdene Dzuu 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:32, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wejście do klasztoru Erdene Dzuu 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:27, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Złota Stupa w klasztorze Erdene Dzuu 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:03, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongołka w pobliżu Złotej Stupy w klasztorze Erdene Dzuu 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good Quality--Hubertl 19:18, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongołka i mnich buddyjski w klasztorze Erdene Dzuu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:42, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolscy turyści w klasztorze Erdene Dzuu 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:09, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gift shop and museum in the Erdene Zuu Monastery. Kharkhorin, Övörkhangai Province, Mongolia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:26, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 16:32, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stupa of Nirvana in Kharkhorin, Övörkhangai Province, Mongolia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment May be a geocoding? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Done I forgot, thanks:) Geolocation added. --Halavar (talk) 10:52, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Very good & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:35, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 16:34, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Temple of Dalai Lama in the Erdene Zuu Monastery. Kharkhorin, Övörkhangai Province, Mongolia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support I think so --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 00:36, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Świątynia Zhanraiseg w klasztorze Erdene Dzuu 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:59, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Świątynia Zhanraiseg w klasztorze Erdene Dzuu 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, CA is minor --Poco a poco 18:40, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mały budynek modlitewny w klasztorze Erdene Dzuu 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:57, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mały budynek modlitewny w klasztorze Erdene Dzuu 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:54, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mnich buddyjski w klasztorze Erdene Dzuu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Is it possible to add bit of sky and (matter of taste ?) to crop the lower part of the picture just above the shadow ? --JLPC 17:07, 3 August 2014 (UTC)  Comment Unfortunately no. I've made this image just like that. --Halavar 17:32, 3 August 2014 (UTC)  Done I tried once again and I prepared new version with better crop. --Halavar 18:34, 3 August 2014 (UTC) OK. --JLPC 18:58, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolscy turyści w klasztorze Erdene Dzuu 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:44, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Pawłowicach detal 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments That seems better. --Mattbuck 17:56, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

File talk:Macaca nigra self-portrait (rotated and cropped).jpg

File talk:Macaca nigra self-portrait (rotated and cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file talk, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

81.149.235.230 13:52, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niebieskie khadagi w klasztorze Erdene Dzuu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --JLPC 15:54, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Golden Stupa in the Erdene Zuu Monastery. Kharkhorin, Övörkhangai Province, Mongolia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:08, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 22:13, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zhanraiseg temple in the Erdene Zuu Monastery. Kharkhorin, Övörkhangai Province, Mongolia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tower of church of John the Baptist in Racibórz, Silesia, Poland..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Joseph in Istebna-Mlaskawka, Silesia, Poland. View from S-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Droga Khushuu Tsaidam w Karakorum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done New version uploaded with reduced saturation, vibrance and contrast --Halavar 21:47, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolscy turyści w klasztorze Erdene Dzuu 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:00, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na miasto Karakorum 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Złota Stupa w klasztorze Erdene Dzuu 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done New version uploaded with reduced saturation and denoised sky. --Halavar 09:13, 14 August 2014 (UTC)  Support Ok. --Livioandronico2013 10:46, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niebo nad budynkami klasztoru Erdene Dzuu 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Userpage editions

Please do not edit my user page. The information that I published there are enough for me. -- Jakubhal 21:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Hej, hej!

Dlaczego userbox twierdzi, że jestem kobietą? ;) i tu panuje gender? :D --1bumer (talk) 18:26, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Oczywiście, że nie mam nic przeciw. Dzięki za założenie kategorii dla mnie, a o dodawaniu do niej zdjęć postaram się pamiętać ;) Pozdrawiam! 1bumer (talk) 08:42, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kocobędz, Wieża strażnicza byłego zamku 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wieża strażnicza byłego zamku w Kocobędzu 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stonawa, Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Świętych Apostołów Piotra i Pawła w Olbrachcicach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --JLPC 18:56, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Świętych Apostołów Piotra i Pawła w Olbrachcicach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but small ccw tilt.--ArildV 17:08, 21 September 2014 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded. --Halavar 17:36, 21 September 2014 (UTC)  Support thank you.--ArildV 17:51, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 Karwina, Frysztat, Kościół św. Marka 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI though the tower is tilted a little bit to the left. ;-) -- Spurzem 20:52, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Piotrowice koło Karwiny, Pomnik św. Jana Nepomucena 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:55, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wędrynia, Kościół św. Katarzyny 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:26, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 Karwina, Frysztat, Żeliwna fontanna na rynku 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:48, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 Karwina, Frysztat, Żeliwna fontanna na rynku 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:37, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Karwina, Darków, Most żelbetowy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:52, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Karwina, Raj, Pomnik św. Jana Nepomucena 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:52, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Olbrachcice, Kościół Świętych Apostołów Piotra i Pawła 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:44, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Karwina, Frysztat, Kościół Podwyższenia Krzyża Świętego 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:25, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 Karwina, Frysztat, Kościół św. Marka 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:18, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Mark in Fryštát, Karviná, Czech Republic. View from S-E..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 20:36, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 Kościół Narodzenia NMP wraz z rzeźbami 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:01, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 Kościół Narodzenia NMP wraz z rzeźbami 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:50, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 Kocobędz, Wieża strażnicza byłego zamku 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:00, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 Olbrachcice, Kościół Świętych Apostołów Piotra i Pawła 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:12, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Trzyniec, Guty, Kościół Bożego Ciała 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:59, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corpus Christi church in Guty, Třinec, Czech Republic. South elevation..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:31, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:46, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lutynia Dolna, Stodoła 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:03, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Karwina, Stare Miasto, Dwór Olszyny 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:46, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Karwina, Frysztat, Żeliwna fontanna na rynku 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:46, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Lutynia Dolna, Pomnik Świętego Patryka w pobliżu kościoła św. Jana Chrzciciela 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:52, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wędrynia, Kościół św. Katarzyny 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jean11 20:42, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saints Peter and Paul in Albrechtice, Cieszyn Silesia, Czech Republic. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Kościół ewangelicki Apostołów Piotra i Pawła 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:53, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Szkoła Petra Bezruča 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:17, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Kościół św. Jodoka 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:11, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Kościół św. Jodoka 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but please, remove the spot I noted --Poco a poco 20:39, 27 September 2014 (UTC)  Done It's done. Thanks.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Kościół św. Jodoka 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 19:30, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Mary Magdalene in Dětmarovice, Czech Republic. View from S-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Orlová, Czech Republic..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross in Fryštát, Karviná, Czech Republic. View from S-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 09:30, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:44, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Fontanna św. Floriana na rynku we Frydku 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:49, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Fontanna św. Floriana na rynku we Frydku 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:09, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Kamienica, Zámecké náměstí 46, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:32, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Kamienica, Zámecké náměstí 43, 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamienice, Zámecké náměstí 22 i 24, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:35, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Kamienica, Zámecké náměstí 25, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:35, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Kamienica, Zámecké náměstí 37, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:27, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barn in Dolní Lutyně, Czech Republic. View from East..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:54, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Kosowo i Albania

Cześć. Tak, ładuję przez tą listy, choć nie jest to takie proste, bo najpierw trzeba przetłumaczyć co jest co i nie zawsze się udaje. Z Macedonią jest gorzej, bo tam chyba miałem problem z oficjalną listą zabytków (chyba zrobię to na oko, zakładając, że stary monaster to zabytek) i trzeba samemu podporządkować numer według ichniejszego szablonu. Pozdrawiam --Pudelek (talk) 09:30, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

dziwne jest to w Albanii. Np. prawdopodobnie ruiny bizantyjskiego forum w Durres na liście zabytków nie są (albo nie potrafię ich znaleźć). Za to taka katedra katolicka w Tiranie, która ma kilkanaście lat - jest! Chyba, że jest inny kościół w Tiranie tego typu... Zdjęcia przydadzą się głównie nam - bo chyba miejscowi wiedzą kaj wrzucać ;) W Kosowie było o tyle ciekawie, że można było wrzucić obiekt z kosowskiego WLM i serbskiego - w sumie robiłem i tak i tak (w sensie meczety do kosowskiego, a cerkwie czasem z serbskiego, choć wiele Serbowie w Kosowie pod ochroną nie mieli - nawet nie wszystkie średniowieczne cerkwie). A Macedończycy chyba się za bardzo do tego nie przygotowali (co widać po czasie rozpoczęcia) i czy w ogóle to dojdzie ostatecznie do skutku? Generalnie chyba najwięcej zdjęć będzie z A1 - to świątynia chrześcijańska, czyli jedyne wrzucone zdjęcie ma błąd. Jest też lista konkretnych budynków po macedońsku, ale widać to na totalną amatorszczyznę --Pudelek (talk) 10:14, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

w Macedonii konkurs miał się zacząć we wrześniu, więc Diego wrzucił fotke. A potem Macedończycy zmienili termin, więc formalnie zdjęcie nie bierze udziału w konkursie. Dziwne to. PS>pytanie za 100 punktów - czym się różni starożytne miasto Appolonia od parku archeologicznego Appolonia?? --Pudelek (talk) 10:51, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

monastyr też jest płatny, więc ciężko powiedzieć, czy to park czy starożytne miasto - tutaj bym zakładał park, bo przecież monastyr miastem antycznym nie był. Chyba, że się okaże, że monastyr to w ogóle nie zabytek :D z Gjirokastry tylko dom Hodży szło zidentyfikować z budynków w mieście :D --Pudelek (talk) 11:39, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Rotonda në Qytetin e Durrësit to jest forum, przynajmniej według wikimapii --Pudelek (talk) 12:31, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Jistebník, Stacja kolejowa 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:04, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Jistebník, Stacja kolejowa 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:15, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:08, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of the Guardian Angel in Starý Bohumín, Czech Republic. Exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:34, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 19:55, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Evangelical Church of the Apostles Peter and Paul in Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:54, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 19:55, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fountain of St. Florian in Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:18, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 16:56, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kolumna z figurą Matki Boskiej we Frydku-Mistku 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:23, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilica of the Visitation of Our Lady in Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic. View from S-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

The building seems too narrow compared to oginal. It would have to expand in width. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

 Done You're right. Thanks for the hint. I uploaded new, fixed version. --Halavar (talk) 00:03, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Jiczyn, Kaplica Matki Boskiej Bolesnej 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:00, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Jiczyn, Kaplica Matki Boskiej Bolesnej 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --ArildV 06:12, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Marklowice Dolne, Kościół Wniebowstąpienia Pańskiego 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but have a look at note please.--Johanning 17:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 Kościół Świętych Apostołów Piotra i Pawła w Olbrachcicach 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:44, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 Olbrachcice, Kościół Świętych Apostołów Piotra i Pawła 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:44, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Cierlicko Górne, Brama z zabytkowymi posągami Świętych Apostołów Macieja i Pawła.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:31, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Review needed

Sorry for disturbing. Actually, for first time i nominate a photo for Commons:Quality Images. but till now nobody aren't review it. Could you please review it. Thank you --Aftab (talk) 10:06, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi, could you please, review those file - first 5 & (no. 62) Rupsha bridge (if this not ok, Decline). Again so Sorry for disturbing. If u have time, please review.  Thanks in advance --Aftab (talk) 23:59, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Railway station in Jistebník, Czech Republic. View from North..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 19:57, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:04, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Judoc in Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic. View from East..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:03, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:44, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Berat, Meczet Kawalerów.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:32, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Butrint 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 11:19, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Butrint 09 Asclepios Temple.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:57, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Butrint 10 - Greek scripts at the theatre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:57, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Butrint 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:53, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Butrint 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:53, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Butrint 15 Theatre and Fortress.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:53, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Butrint 05 Prytaneion and Asclepios Sanctuary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 11:27, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Butrint 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 11:27, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Butrint 03 Asclepios Sanctuary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 11:27, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na Lepetane 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 01:24, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Kościół Bożego Ciała w Gutach 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:52, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Berat, Cerkiew św. Teodora.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:53, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Berat, Zamek 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality despite a slight problem (see note, please) --JLPC 14:24, 3 October 2014 (UTC)  Done I uploaded new version. You were right about that crop. Thanks. --Halavar 16:10, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Berat, Zamek 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:53, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Butrint 26 Nymphaeum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:35, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Butrint 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 08:48, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Butrint 31.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Butrint 34.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:53, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Butrint 37 city wall ruins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 08:48, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Butrint 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:58, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Butrint 14 - Roman bath and Asclepios Sanctuary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:58, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kunín, Kościół Podwyższenia Krzyża Świętego 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:33, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Kamienica, Zámecké náměstí 47, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:49, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Kamienica, Zámecké náměstí 44, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:49, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Kamienica, Zámecké náměstí 44, 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:49, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Kamienica, Zámecké náměstí 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:49, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Kamienica, Zámecké náměstí 38, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:49, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Muradiye Mosque in Vlorë, Albania. Exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:38, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:27, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 Kościół Świętych Apostołów Piotra i Pawła w Olbrachcicach 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:33, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Karwina, Darków, Dom Zdrojowy 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:33, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Karwina, Darków, Dom Zdrojowy 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:33, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Karwina, Raj, Pomnik św. Jana Nepomucena 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:47, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Karwina, Granice, Wieża ciśnień 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:33, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Gjirokastra, Twierdza 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:18, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Gjirokastra, Twierdza 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:18, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Gjirokastra, Twierdza 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:18, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bachelors' Mosque in Berat, Albania. View from South..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:11, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Prizren, Budynek Ligi Prizreńskiej 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A little noisy in the lifted shadow parts, but no problem with the uploaded resolution. --Slaunger 18:53, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Prizren, Hammam Gaziego Mehmeta Paszy 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:19, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Prizren, Cerkiew Bogurodzicy Ljeviškiej 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:30, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Bukowiec, Zagroda wiejska (Bukovec 35).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:22, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Karwina, Frysztat, Żeliwna fontanna na rynku 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:50, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Bazylika Nawiedzenia NMP 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:50, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Dawny ratusz w Mistku 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:50, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Fontanna św. Floriana na rynku we Frydku 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:50, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 Kościół Świętych Apostołów Piotra i Pawła w Olbrachcicach 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:28, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Ascension of Jesus in Dolní Marklovice, Czech Republic. View from S-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:08, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:30, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Prizren, Most kamienny.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:42, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Jiczyn, Kaplica Matki Boskiej Bolesnej 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and composition, but some CA left to remove. --ArildV 06:12, 1 October 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review. I uploaded new fixed version, hope it's better now --Halavar 10:19, 1 October 2014 (UTC) I think it is still some small CA on the right tree, but not a big problem.-ArildV 21:04, 2 October 2014 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded with fixed (I hope) CA and with better crop (I think). Please take a look again. --Halavar 06:31, 3 October 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:49, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Kamienica, Zámecké náměstí 37, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:47, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zawada, Kaplica św. Jana Nepomucena 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:02, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół ewangelicki Apostołów Piotra i Pawła we Frydku-Mistku 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:00, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Jistebník, Stacja kolejowa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:28, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Kamienica, Zámecké náměstí 22, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:28, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamienica, Zámecké náměstí 24, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:03, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Kamienica, Zámecké náměstí 25, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:28, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Fontanna św. Floriana na rynku we Frydku 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:28, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na Lepetane 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment CAs and a bit of noise IMO--Lmbuga 01:24, 4 October 2014 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 09:43, 6 October 2014 (UTC) QI for me--Lmbuga 21:11, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 15:59, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, kamienica, Náměstí Svobody 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 15:59, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, kamienica, Náměstí Svobody 2, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think, this is good quality --J. Lunau 13:33, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The gate with the historical statues of the Holy Apostles Matthias and Paul in Kostelec, Horní Těrlicko, Czech Republic.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:57, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Evangelical Church of the Apostles Peter and Paul in Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic. View from South..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It's unfortunate that the pine tree completely blocks the view of the front entrance to the church, one of its most important and distinguishing features. The tree at right isn't helping either. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 16:34, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment So, I should go there and cut these two trees? ;) --Halavar (talk) 16:51, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Info It's view from S-W. --Ikar.us (talk) 08:52, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Info Both directions were wrong. It's view from South. --Halavar (talk) 09:33, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Photo is good quality and I like the perspective, with the steeple extended up into the sky, with no other distracting objects behind it -- but those trees are simply in the wrong place and the hedges are also obscuring the foundation work. It's almost like looking at a picture of someone with a bag over their head. Is there any way to get a better shot that includes the front entrance and ultimately the foundation? i.e. Are we allowed to replace a nominated image with a better one before it's approved? -- Gwillhickers (talk) 16:53, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • There is already VI:Evangelical Church of the Apostles Peter and Paul in Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic. Facade. --Ikar.us (talk) 17:38, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment I think you don't understand: there is no other way, to take a picture from this side without a trees. My 4 other images (you can see them here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Lutheran_church_in_Fr%C3%BDdek) shown the facade (front entrance). One of the is a VI with scope "Facade". In this image (the only one on Commons) I show other part of this church. --Halavar (talk) 17:42, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

• I didn't realize this photo belonged to a set. As part of a set, the photo is okay. If you intend to use this photo in an article I would include more than one image. Beautiful church! If you plan on writing an article about the church you might also want to take some inside shots, aye? -- Gwillhickers (talk) 19:02, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

• • I do understand. And since it's obviously not possible to take one single image of the complete exterior, I  Support the additional scope, because of the tree. --Ikar.us (talk) 19:04, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

• @Ikar.us: -- Just out of curiosity, what does the tree have to do with the scope of this image? -- Gwillhickers (talk) 23:16, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment When I was there, the church was closed. But in the next time, I'm planning to make other shots (including the inside ones). I think that in the spring, when there will be less green, trees will be not so much irritating:) Thanks both for a review. --Halavar (talk) 19:13, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Support -- @Halavar: As this image is part of a set that includes plenty of shots of the entrance, and since this particular image has the most dynamic shot of the steeple, imo, I'll second the motion to Support. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 23:16, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Immaculate Conception in Ostrava-Přívoz, Czech Republic. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:59, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Kościół św. Jodoka 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:58, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Ewangelicki kościół Chrystusowy 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Extreme perspective, but OK for me. --Tuxyso 08:34, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Kamienica, náměstí Svatopluka Čecha 1, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:47, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Kamienica, náměstí Svatopluka Čecha 2, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 16:06, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Kamienica, ul. Hlávkova 1, 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:33, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Ochryda, Cerkiew świętej Zofii (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:30, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamienice, Zámecké náměstí 22 i 24, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:55, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Kościół św. Jodoka 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:37, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół ewangelicki Apostołów Piotra i Pawła we Frydku-Mistku 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo --Lewis Hulbert 14:52, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Ochryda, Cerkiew świętej Zofii (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:55, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Karwina, Frysztat, Ratusz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Most na Odrze na drodze numer 56 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done Thanks, you were right. I uploaded new version. Please take a look again. --Halavar 16:41, 8 October 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Pleclown 17:23, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Townhouse, 37 Zámecké náměstí in Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic. Exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:36, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bartošovice, Zamek 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --JLPC 21:42, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bogumin, Stary Bogumin, Kamienica, Náměstí Svobody 45, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:32, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamienice, Zámecké náměstí 52 i ul. Zámecká 54, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:58, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Kamienica, Zámecké náměstí 49, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:32, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Jiczyn, Kaplica Matki Boskiej Bolesnej 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:47, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Kamienica, náměstí Svatopluka Čecha 10, 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:49, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamienica, Zámecké náměstí 51, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:08, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Butrint 16 Asclepios temple .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:17, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spa House in Darkov, Karviná, Czech Republic. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:38, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 19:46, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Třebovice, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:54, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiadukt kolejowy Mala Rijeka w Czarnogórze.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:59, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pałac w Boryni 7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:59, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Nowy Ratusz 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:32, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Kamienica, náměstí Svatopluka Čecha 1, 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:00, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Kamienica, náměstí Svatopluka Čecha 10, 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:36, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Kamienica, Masarykovo náměstí 3, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 09:19, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Kamienica, ul. Hlávkova 1, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:23, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Kolumna maryjna, 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:59, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Nowy Ratusz 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting building. I think the left part are learning to the left (maybe some tilt/perspective correction mistake). Otherwise QI imo.--ArildV 09:23, 11 October 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks, you were right. New version uploaded. Please, take a look again. --Halavar 09:47, 11 October 2014 (UTC)  Support Thank you.--ArildV 14:06, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Most Miloše Sýkory 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:42, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Townhouse in Přívoz, 1 náměstí Svatopluka Čecha, Nádražní street, Ostrava, Czech Republic. View from East..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:08, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 08:47, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Margaret church in Bludovice, Havířov, Czech Republic. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 21:31, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Please stop...

Please stop this kind of nonsense, my reviews may be hard but I always do my best to be objective. I really don't know what was up with your camera, your lens, your software,... during/after the Macedonia church session, but most of that pictures are never ever quality images, you will know that very well if you examine them at 100%, I don't know what's your problem with me. "Improper and inobjective" is kind of personal attack, that you please consider to take back. Thanks --A.Savin 11:10, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

It's not only "Macedonia church session". You were not here (QIC page) for the last couple of months. But I remember before that when I nominated my photos, almost always they received a decline status from you. For what I remember, you promote only one or two my images. But the most important is that you never wrote (in comparison to other users) on pictures, that something can be improved/fixed, you just gave the refusal. During these months when you were not in QIC, many of my photos (now more than 400) got the status of Quality Images. Well, when you returned today, again appeared a very harsh approach to my photos from you (not only for quality reasons, but also talking about that flooding). And you're the only one on QIC page, who has this approach to my photos. So, it looks like an personal thing... Now, I do not know what will happen in the coming days when I'll nominate my pictures. Or is there a sens for nominating other images? --Halavar (talk) 11:44, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

I disagree. I didn't count how much stuff by you I promoted, but that was surely far more than a couple. However, there was also quite much to decline, because there were e.g. problems with CA, sharpness, i.e. such things that are difficult or not anymore to fix afterwards. That is because I declined them straightaway. Ask Poco or any other active QIC'er and they will confirm that anytime there were fixable problems such as dustspots or perspective, I usually first suggested to fix them. It is really NOT my problem that many photos of you were promoted. Maybe there were OK, maybe not, but if the latter is the case, then it is not my problem but a very serious problem of the QIC project. Again, "flooding" rather meets the point today because it were 15 images a day mainly with the same church. On Commons talk:Quality images candidates, similar issues were discussed in the near past multiple times... As I said, my reviews may be generally harsh comparing to some other participants' reviews, but I try to do my best for objective reviewing. There are NO personal issues as you suppose. Why should there be any?? I want to repeat that it is a personal attack to allege me on QIC page of inobjective reviewing! And again: photos of you I recently declined are indeed unsharp / with strange artefacts etc., I'm not an expert and I really don't know what was up, but it is the fact, and I sincerely think that promoting images with such notable technical flaws will damage the QI project in the long run. --A.Savin 12:01, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

In my talk page you can easily see "how many" my images were promoted by you. Also on the archives of QI you can also easily see lots of my "red" declined images, declined mostly by you. When you went on a "vacation" from QIC page, suddenly situation was changed and lots of my images got a QI status. Sometimes, reviewers gave me a hints, and after a fixed those problems, images got a QI status. I remember, that you are the only person on QIC page which straight give a declined status. And I think this is kind of a problem... "problems with CA, sharpness, i.e. such things that are difficult or not anymore to fix afterwards." - I disagree. In software you can easily add sharpness and remove CA. About a flooding... When you see in archives in the last months you will see, that other users nominated about 15 images for a whole day and there wasn't a problem. I didn't nominate images of mainly one church: 1 image of Ancient Theatre, 4 images of Samuil's Fortress, 5 images of Saint Panteleimon church and 5 images of Church of St. John at Kaneo. About objective... On the same day, User:Jacek Halicki nominated 14 images. I haven't seen the opinion speaking, that it is a flooding. Also, in Consensual review, you made a review, an opposition vote, only to my image (of the church in the Czech Republic) - tot for others, but only to my image. About sharpness/artifacts in my recently nominated images. I've added sharpness to them, because I thought, that they are not sharp enough. And when I did it, you declined them because in your opinion they are unsharp or they've got artifacts. "I want to repeat that it is a personal attack to allege me on QIC page of inobjective reviewing" - OK, I changed my words to more neutral. When you said, that promoting about my 400 images might be a very serious problem of the QIC project now I thinking, that maybe I should not have nominate my images in the future... --Halavar (talk) 12:50, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

So, you apparently claim now that all people promote your images and I am the only one who declines. That cannot be true, but even if it is, then, as I already said, it is not a problem with my reviews but rather with careless reviews by some other people, and that is generally a significant problem of the QI project since a long time! Let's not forget that an image is, once promoted, "4-ever" a QI, no matter how good or bad its quality actually is; on the other hand, for any review which ends up in a decline, you are always free to open a CR to see opinions by other people. With that said, I kindly request you to do it as following in the future: 1) assume good faith on what I do on QIC or elsewhere; 2) if you disagree on a review, send it to CR without personal attacks. Regarding sharpness: no! You can sharpen in Photoshop as much as you want, but if your camera produced a hopelessly blurry photo, no Photoshop in this world may give your photo more details than it has; the result will be unpleasant noise and artefacts like we see on several of your photos of that church. Having been active as photographer for some long, you should actually know or guess it. --A.Savin 18:55, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello Halavar, A.Savin, as Alexander mentioned me in this discussion and I went through the thread I'd like to drop a line here. I find Alexander's reviews very straightforward and sometimes though (especially in FPC, rather than QIC), and in somes cases not understandable to me. Still, overall he is a good reviewer with to problem to decline (some people avoid that to prevent things like this, revenge votes, enemies, etc.), but I believe that declining when it is necessary is not just something to be done but healthy, especially for the nominator. After over 5000 QIs I have no big problem if my images are declined, in most of the cases I do actually agree and wonder how I could have nominated that (in other cases it was a mistake).

Halavar, I find your pictures good but many of them (e.g. Mongolia) just ok in terms of sharpness, and I believe that a more strict reviewer would have declined many and a more tolerable reviewer would have promoted both of them. The pictures from Ohrid (nice place, by the way, that I had the opportunity to visit back in April) are definitely below your standard. Most of them have poor detail, maybe due to a strong denoising (it looks like painting) that you have applied my mistake (it happened to me for a few hundred pictures and I couldn't see that problem in my pictures back then, but clear to me now)? Sometimes (rarely) I have found the quality of the pictures of one session just poor and couldn't find a reason for that until today, maybe this was the case.

Alexander, I checked 2 or 3 pictures from Halavar and finally declined one of them (no promotions) in order to "send a message". What I didn't do (but could have done) was declining 5 at once. I didn't do it because it can be misunderstood (it is obviously the case here) and because I was sure that the row was not QI but an experienced user like Halavar will look at the topic with different eyes if the declines come from 3-4 users rather than from one. I think that sometimes being more careful can help to spare this kind of situations (although strictly you are right in my opinion that those pictures don't deserve the QI stamp). Just my opinion and observations, hopefully nobody gets offended here. Poco² 21:11, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your feedback Diego. It has given a lot of sense between the opinions of mine and Alexander and basically I fully agree with you. To be clear, I never claimed that my images from Ohrid are great and easily should get a QI status. If there were problems that can not be corrected (and all indications that it was) I understand the rejection of them. But as I wrote, it was not just these few photos from Ohrid, but the problem was with all my nominated images checked by Alexander in winter and spring. Okay, I hope that when A. Savin returned to the QIC page it is still a chance that I can nominate my photos and some part of them maybe gets a QI certificate. We'll see what will happen in the next few weeks. BTW, in this year, I am a member of the committee in the Polish edition of the Wiki Loves Monuments and while selecting images I saw many of your great photos from Poznan and Gniezno. Maybe some of them will go to the finals ... :) Anyway, thanks for your contributions in the Polish edition! --Halavar (talk) 21:52, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi Diego, thanks for commenting on this issue. While you're probably right that I should not necessarily have declined 4 or 5 photos by Halavar at once, the reason I did it nonetheless (despite my usual laziness as reviewer, as we know I rarely process more than 1-2 images per user) was my worry that otherwise that pictures would be promoted by someone else; as we indeed have the problem on QIC that some active reviewers don't seem to bother examining pictures as carefully as it is necessary to go conform with our Image guidelines. Besides, I'm open for critiques on my activities on QIC or elsewhere; I surely don't wish any misunderstandings like this one above, which is hopefully gone now. --A.Savin 22:08, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) I cannot say how often Alexander declined your pictures in comparison to other authors or other reviewers, but I believe that A.Savin is an objective reviewer, tough but objective. I also have experienced that some users usually don't promote my pictures and just point out problems, but in the long run I think that I can conclude that my appreciations were wrong.

Regarding WLM in Poland: I visit Poland (especially Gniezno) very often for private reasons so I couldn't miss the opportunity to participate in WLM. Last year a picture of mine ranked 6th but I was disqualified because I have no PESEL. Is that fair? sure not, and actually IMHO it is contradictory to the principles of a movement like Wikimedia. That's why I cannot expect much, best case a disqualification :) Still, I got a merchandasing package from WMPL, which I didn't expect and was a nice surprise :) Maybe you can move things to avoid that this kind of absurd prerequisites apply in the future. Just 2 examples: in Thailand I placed 2 pictures among the first 10 and they didn't disqualify me and in Spain we gave a prize to an American fellow,... Dobranoc, Poco² 22:20, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

As for WLM in Poland: We will be talking about that situation with PESEL on Saturday. --Halavar (talk) 22:35, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

It would be great if you find a solution to that. Also Kadellar was wondering whether participate or not in WLM Poland due to the PESEL. He finally did and also updated some nice pictures Poco² 21:27, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

My personal opinion is that all Wikimedia users should have a chance for the prize in WLM, regardless of their nationality and citizenship. But I don't know what thinks other members of Polish WLM jury. We will see on Saturday:) --Halavar (talk) 21:34, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Halavar. I think the PESEL problem should be solved. You are excluding all foreign photographers and tourists from participating. It would also be very tricky (or "cheaty") if you admit foreign participants but you don't say in advance that they can't win, and that's what is happening now imo. I know the most important thing here is contributing and illustrating as many monuments as possible, but the prize can always be a good reason to join the contest, wherever you come from. I am an usual user of Commons, but I could have just joined only for WLM Polska and I would feel very disappointed if I suffered the same situation as Poco last year. One of the secondary goals of WLM is getting new users and PESEL doesn't help. Well, dziękuję za twojej pracę! --Kadellar (talk) 21:35, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Kadellar and Poco_a_poco According to our Saturday meeting, I've got a news for you. Unfortunately it's not a good news. According to the polish law, we (a non profit organisation like Wikimedia Foundation) can not give a money to persons without a PESEL number (it means without Polish citizenship or permanent stay in Poland for a study or work). Soory guys --Halavar (talk) 11:45, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

And in the case of winning something, could a foreigner donate the prize to a Polish friend or even to Wikimedia Polska? Or also renouncing to the money but still going to the international part of the contest and be proclaimed as one of the Polish winners? Money is not everything ;) --Kadellar (talk) 12:01, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

I do not know for sure, because I do not know too much of the law, but it seems to me that it can not. In the rules of the Polish edition of WLM (which is available here: https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wiki_Lubi_Zabytki/Regulamin) writes that "to receive awards and prizes in the Contest participants must give to the Organizer name, surname and PESEL number". But as I said, I'm not an expert so for the specific questions you need to write to the Organizer of the competition. --Halavar (talk) 13:46, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Too much formalism IMHO. I cannot understand that WMPL can not think of a way to bypass this restriction, e.g. arranging that a different chapter or even the WMF directly handovers a gift or whatever to the winner. Is not that I have big hopes to be awarded, but I just find this rule unfair, and my motivation for next editions of WLM in Poland is accordingly low. If any of Kadellar's or my pictures makes it to the top 10, would you let us know (as last year) or are these pictures right away disqualified from the top 10 or even in previous evaluation phases so that they don't make it to the top 10? Poco² 13:40, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Now, I can not say anything. You (as others} have to wait for the announcement of the results. --Halavar (talk) 13:46, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

I don't expect any statement from anybody at this moment. I was just wondering whether at least WMPL would announce the "moral winners" (at least privately like last year) or just would just discard pictures of foreigners before they make it to the final phase. Poco² 18:46, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

To Poco_a_poco Finally we've got results of the Polish part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2014. As you can see, there aren't any of your photos in the final 10. Although I admit that I remember two of your images in the TOP 100. I can tell you that in this year there wasn't a problem that one of your photos was withdrawn from TOP 10 because you don't have a PESEL number. This all also applies to Kadellar. Sorry guys:) --Halavar (talk) 19:58, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for letting us know. You have some nice pictures under the finalist, so you did a good work :) On the other side, and due to the PESEL topic, I have decided not to participate in WLM Poland anymore. Poco² 21:25, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Ok, guys, let's then focus on other topics and have some rest for today! Poco² 22:23, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Ochryda, Cerkiew św. Jana Teologa w Kaneo (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportGood quality, even it is a little bit oversharpened.--Hubertl 17:07, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Ochryda, Cerkiew św. Jana Teologa w Kaneo (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:00, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Ochryda, Cerkiew św. Jana Teologa w Kaneo (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:39, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bogumin, Skrzeczoń, Kościół Matki Boskiej Bolesnej 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:00, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, kamienica, Náměstí Svobody 13, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:00, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, kamienica, Náměstí Svobody 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:45, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Jiczyn, Kaplica Matki Boskiej Bolesnej 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:11, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Ewangelicki kościół Chrystusowy 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:24, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Katedra Boskiego Zbawiciela 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:15, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castle in Bartošovice, Czech Republic. View from S-E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:04, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Saint John of Nepomuk in Petrovice u Karviné, Czech Republic..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Aftab (talk) 00:02, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Townhouse, 44 Zámecké náměstí in Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:04, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
New Town Hall in Ostrava, Czech Republic. Entrance..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:48, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 16:44, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
New Town Hall in Ostrava, Czech Republic. View from West..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:48, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 16:46, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Ochryda, Cerkiew św. Pantelejmona (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Negligible CAs on the upper cross, but QI. --JLPC 21:02, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Ochryda, Cerkiew św. Pantelejmona (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:55, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Ochryda, Cerkiew św. Pantelejmona (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok--ArildV 13:46, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Ochryda, Cerkiew św. Pantelejmona (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 13:46, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Ochryda, Cerkiew św. Pantelejmona (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--ArildV 13:46, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Ochryda, Antyczny teatr (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:51, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Třebovice, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:52, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Stacja kolejowa Ostrava-střed 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:52, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Nowy Ratusz 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:52, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Bitola, Meczet Jeni 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:28, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Fontanna św. Floriana na rynku we Frydku 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:13, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Kamienica, ul. Farní 17, 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:13, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Kamienica, ul. Nádražní 176, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:44, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Ratusz w Śląskiej Ostrawie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:36, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Townhouse, 51 Zámecké náměstí street, Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --JLPC (talk) 13:09, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 20:25, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dawna plebania, obecnie przedszkole w Ustroniu-Lipowcu 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:23, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Willa, ul. Českobratrská 4, 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:01, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Jabłonków, Dom, Rynek Mariacki 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:01, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Kamienica, náměstí Svatopluka Čecha 10, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 21:23, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Kamienica, náměstí Svatopluka Čecha 4, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 21:23, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kunín, Kościół Podwyższenia Krzyża Świętego 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Mattbuck 21:07, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cast iron fountain, Masarykovo náměstí, Karviná, Czech Republic..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment : I'm not sure, but I think your other picture (File:2013 Karwina, Frysztat, Żeliwna fontanna na rynku 01.jpg) is better. Is it only a matter of taste ? Maybe someone else can help us ? -- Friendly. --JLPC (talk) 12:19, 8 October 2014 (UTC)!
•  Comment Maybe you're right. I decided to make a MVR contest. Now, we may decide, wich one is better:) --Halavar (talk) 12:36, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment I would prefer this one, as the main object is too dark in the other image. But it is also quite dark here, so that you can hardly see the details, and it is tilted ccw. --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:10, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:23, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tenement house, 3 Masarykovo náměstí, Ostrava, Czech Republic..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 15:35, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:40, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Karwina, Frysztat, Pałac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:34, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Bazylika Nawiedzenia NMP 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Hej

Nie chciało by Ci się trochę skategoryzować zdjęć wrzuconych przez Antkabojara? Nie wiem kiedy ja bym się miał za to zabrać, a wiem, że masz to obcykane :) D T G (talk) 10:08, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Okej, dzięki za info:) --Halavar (talk) 10:35, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall of Slezská Ostrava, Czech Republic. View from N-E..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 00:30, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 Orłowa, Ratusz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:13, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Kamienica, Zámecké náměstí 48, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:50, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bogumin, Stary Bogumin, Kościół Narodzenia NMP 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Ochryda, Twierdza cara Samuela (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 19:35, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Ochryda, Cerkiew św. Jana Teologa w Kaneo (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 19:35, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Nowy Ratusz 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Both sides are leaning out, see the verticals at the half top --Christian Ferrer 05:19, 20 October 2014 (UTC)  Done You were right. New fixed version uploaded. --Halavar 10:57, 20 October 2014 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 16:42, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Ratusz w Śląskiej Ostrawie 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:46, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Kamienica, Zámecké náměstí 41, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:30, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Kamienica, Zámecké náměstí 48, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 23:11, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Bitola, Heraclea Lyncestis (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:39, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Bitola, Heraclea Lyncestis (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and interesting.--Jebulon 20:01, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Bitola, Heraclea Lyncestis (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:39, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Bitola, Heraclea Lyncestis (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:39, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Bitola, Heraclea Lyncestis (33).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A nice and sharp picture. It's QI for me --C T Johansson 10:26, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Bitola, Heraclea Lyncestis (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 14:15, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Bitola, Heraclea Lyncestis (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The object is sharp all the way, and that's QI for me. --C T Johansson 10:20, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Bitola, Heraclea Lyncestis (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:32, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Bitola, Heraclea Lyncestis (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:10, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Bitola, Heraclea Lyncestis (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:25, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Bitola, Heraclea Lyncestis (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:27, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Bitola, Heraclea Lyncestis (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:27, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Bitola, Heraclea Lyncestis (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:42, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Karwina, Frysztat, Pałac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:16, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Townhouse, 48 Zámecké náměstí in Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:48, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Townhouse, 41 Zámecké náměstí in Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:49, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Bitola, Heraclea Lyncestis (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:10, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Most Miloše Sýkory 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:26, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół ewangelicko-augsburski w Jaworzu 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:43, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dwór w Bażanowicach 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. IMO a little bit noisy but acceptable. --XRay 17:37, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ruins of the Small Basilica in Heraclea Lyncestis. Bitola, Macedonia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 14:58, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:41, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Kamienica, náměstí Svatopluka Čecha 1, 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:16, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Kamienica, náměstí Svatopluka Čecha 4, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:46, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół Ewangelicko-Augsburski w Rybniku 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rynek w Wodzisławiu Śląskim 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:01, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plebania w Krzyżowicach 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:44, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konie mongolskie w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you sharpen the horse more? The photo would be better if it is slightly sharper. --Graphium 05:13, 31 October 2014 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded. --Halavar 10:16, 31 October 2014 (UTC)  Promoted The picture looks much better now. --Graphium 10:46, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krajobraz w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 34.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Graphium 05:11, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konie mongolskie w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:08, 31 October 2014 (UTC)