KrzysztofPoplawski

ul.<->Wikipedii

Po kropce w języku polskim występuje przerwa czyli spacja. Może poprawić więc grafikę, tak aby spełniała standardy naszego ojczystego języka? 81.190.7.243 10:54, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Wnetrze_mieszczanskie_Katowice.JPG

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you. Siebrand 18:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image Tagging Image:Kuchnia sredniego mieszczan.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Kuchnia sredniego mieszczan.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

re:

Jesli nie umiesz przeczytac czegos, co masz na dyskusji przez 3 tygodnie to pretensje mozesz miec tylko do siebie --Szczepan talk  15:51, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

• Przepraszam, że się wtrącę: napisałeś, że mało się udzielasz, a jednocześnie oczekujesz, że inni będą się z każdym zdjęciem obchodzić jak z jajkiem, poświęcając swój cenny czas. Nawet nie podałeś (lub nie zweryfikowałeś) adresu emailowego, aby można isę było skontaktować z Tobą w sprawie zdjęć. Przywracam je, ale jak znowu zajrzysz tu dopiero za miesiąc, to znów ich nie będzie. Pozdrawiam! A.J. 08:00, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Skoro masz czas na bezsensowne dyskusje ze mna czy Ejdzejem oskarzajac go o jakies wizje niszczycielskie a mnie o ignorancje (mimo ze to Ty niedopelniles swojego obowiazku), a w dalszym ciagu nie uzupelniles licencji, to sie nie dziw, jak zdjecia poleca drugi raz. I kto tu jest ignorantem? EOT --Szczepan talk  17:24, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

• File:Kromborg View from the sea.jpg

BotMultichillT 21:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Not a mosquito

Greetings, your picture Komar_widliszek2.jpg is not a mosquito, but rather a non-biting midge, wither from the Family Chaoboridae or from the Family Chironomidae. Best regards, --Küchenkraut (talk) 15:15, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Kromborg View from the sea.jpg

File:Kromborg View from the sea.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 21:28, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Sielecki Przemsza Sosnowiec Jesień.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good composition, very intense colors --Augustgeyler 21:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inline skating track Sosnowiec.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Sielecki, Sosnowiec, 3 Maja street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Très beau paysage. La résolution est très fine, on voit énormément de détail, bon contraste et la composition est équilibrée. Les couleurs sont légèrement saturées mais je trouve que cela passe bien. --Elryck 13:15, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Please enable e-mail to be eligible to win a prize in Wiki Loves Monuments!

Thank you for uploading images for Wiki Loves Monuments!

However, we have noticed you have not enabled e-mail. To be eligible to win a prize the contest, you need to enable e-mail. This is what to do:

1. Check the top right of your screen, and log in if you have not done so already
2. Go to your preferences
3. Scroll down to Email Options
4. Enter your email address and click "Allow other users to email me"
5. Click Save
   

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pałac Schoena Muzeum w Sosnowcu Środuli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Quality not the best but the light is lovely --Podzemnik 19:10, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schöen Palace in Sosnowiec, northwest orientation.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It would be good to put the view orientation. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Good suggestion. Done -- Krzysztof Popławski (talk)

•  Comment He means for you to put it in the scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:02, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Can You check i done it right ? -- Krzysztof Popławski (talk) 20:58, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Your scope is on the "scope" line in this nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:32, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:48, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Stimoroll,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:25, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Schoena Ostra Górka Sosnowiec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 18:44, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stok Środula.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice composition and atmosphere, but please eliminate the COM:OVERCAT. You might be able to add other relevant categories, but you can't have a subcategory of Sosnowiec and the parent category. -- Ikan Kekek 05:30, 13 April 2021 (UTC) Done. I've found few more specific. --Stimoroll 11:16, 13 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Thanks. Reflections of mountains is an overstatement, but I'm satisfied. -- Ikan Kekek 21:45, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pond Stawiki, pier and beach, Sosnowiec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very nice, good quality. --Steindy 11:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osiedle Nikiszowiec, Katowice,001, 2021-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:06, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:14, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Środula, Sosnowiec, Jesień 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:58, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dawna szkoła Ostrowy Górnicze Sosnowiec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:58, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:11, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Category:Cycling_children

Cycling children has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Prototyperspective (talk) 12:17, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Abzeronow (talk) 16:12, 1 December 2023 (UTC)