Loz

Image:LBT119(loz).jpg

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 16:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krähe 65(loz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Buteo 1(loz).JPG

Hi Loz

This image is wonderful but will fail as a quality image due to it's size. Could you upload a >2MP (say 2000 pixels wide ?) - Peripitus 02:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crocus(loz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buteo 2(loz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buteo 5(loz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Hi, I'm wondering, how did you get so close for this picture (really good quality!)? I have similar equipment and the closest I could get was for this picture (at 300mm). I had to sneak around a tree and take the shot pretty quickly as he flew away as soon as he saw me. You must have been even closer than I was, so maybe you were 10m away? --Dori - Talk 15:11, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

That was large luck. This young animal was not shy at all, and sat for several minutes in a peopled municipal park. By the way I also like your picture very much.

Fehlbestimmung Libelle

Hallo Loz, auf deinem schönen Bild "Image:Sympetrum sanguineum 1(loz).jpg" sieht man kein Männchen der Blutroten Heidelibelle, sondern eines der Gefleckten (Sympetrum flaveolum). Beachte den deutlichen gelben Hinterflügelfleck. Auch sind die Beine nicht schwarz, sondern hell gestreift. -- Gruß, Fice (talk) 20:55, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Oh Mist, da war ich zu forsch. Dank für Deine schnelle Reaktion. Das nächste mal schau ich wieder in meine Bücher. Gruß--Loz (talk) 07:53, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

neu hochgeladen als Image:Sympetrum flaveolum 1(loz).jpg --Loz (talk) 07:16, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Enallagma cyathigerum 1(loz).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Enallagma cyathigerum 1(loz).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Benh (talk) 19:08, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sympetrum danae 2(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Promotion of course. Excellent! Vassil 18:29, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lycaena tityrus 1(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- Alvesgaspar 22:12, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sympetrum danae 1(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good --LC-de 19:42, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Location-Tag

Hallo Loz,

ich habe mir eben erlaubt, aus einigen Deiner (mit Verlaub: hervorragenden!) Aufnahmen zu entfernen. Das ist nicht etwa Boshaftigkeit o.Ä., und natürlich habe ich (inzwischen) verstanden, dass dies die Orte sind, an denen Du die Aufnahmen gemacht hattest. Allerdings haben diese Location-Tags einen Nebeneffekt: sie werden in Google-Maps angezeigt, wo sie die Umgebung illustrieren sollen. Du wirst möglicherweise meine Irritation nachfühlen können, als ich eben Planten und Blomen per Google Maps betrachtete.

Ich überlege bereits einige Zeit, ob es eine andere Möglichkeit gibt, diese Aufnahmeorte sinnvoll zu referenzieren. Falls Du solch eine Möglichkeit kennst würde ich mich darüber freuen, wenn Du mir eine kurze Nachricht darüber hinterlassen könntest.

Noch einmal: großer Applaus für Deine Arbeiten. Sehr beeindruckend.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Carol.Christiansen (talk) 17:41, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Hallo Carol,
es ist mir schon klar, daß die Bilder bei Google Maps angezeigt werden, das ist ja gerade der Sinn. Es ist auf den Commons üblich, daß auch Bilder von Lebewesen georeferenziert werden, siehe zB bei den tollen Fotografen Lycaon, LC-de oder Alvesgaspar. Es macht auch Sinn, da es den Benutzern ermöglicht, einen Eindruck vom Habitat des fotografierten und evt unbekannten Lebewesens zu bekommen. Schau Dir doch zB diesen Spatz an, den überraschenden Einblick in die Landschaft, der sich beim Blick in Google Maps eröffnet, sowie die anderen Fotos die sich einem dann bieten. Ich fände es auch gut, wenn man beim Betrachten in Google Earth wählen könnte ob man Landschaften, Architektur, Lebewesen angezeigt bekommen möchte. Vorerst geht das wohl noch nicht und so wirst Du Dir beim Betrachten auch noch (schöne) Bilder von Libellen, Schmetterlingen... anzeigen lassen müssen.
Ich mach die Geoinformation jetzt wieder rein. Bitte drinlassen. Danke fürs Lob. Liebe Grüße--Loz (talk) 09:35, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Und ich hatte die Einträge für ein Missverständnis gehalten. Na, dann lassen wir die Tags eben drin. :-) Freundliche Grüße, --Carol.Christiansen (talk) 11:21, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sympetrum danae 4(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 18:51, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ai(loz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --LC-de 12:18, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sympetrum flaveolum 1(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Wieder fragliche Heidelibelle (?)

Hallo Loz, ich will ja nicht nerven, aber bei deinem Foto Image:Sympetrum vulgatum 1(loz).jpg habe ich zumindest wieder etwas Zweifel wegen der Bestimmung. Mir sieht das Tier nach einem Männchen von Sympetrum striolatum aus, vor allem wegen der hellen Thorax-Seitenbinden. Immerhin scheint es sich ja um ein ausgefärbtes Exemplar zu handeln, und da haben die Männchen von Sympetrum vulgatum meistens ziemlich einheitlich braune Thoraxseiten. Ganz sicher bin ich mir aber auch nicht, weil man die weiteren Unterscheidungsmerkmale der beiden Arten aus dieser Perspektive nicht wirklich sehen kann. Hast du von dem Tier noch mehr Bilder gemacht? -- Gruß, Fice (talk) 22:21, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Du nervst überhaupt nicht, ganz im Gegenteil, ich freue mich jedesmal über Dein fachliches Urteil, selbst wenn Du mir meine Inkompetenz unter die Nase reibst.
Ich hatte allerdings bei dieser Libelle auch Zweifel wegen der hellen Seitenstreifen, hab mich dann aber vom Bellmann einlullen lassen, der angibt, daß Sympetrum striolatum im Norden selten sei. Ist natürlich kein Grund, und daher gut, daß Du so aufmerksam bist. Ich hab noch mehr Fotos, leider jedoch fast alle aus der gleichen Position. Eins hab ich doch noch gefunden, und (überbelichtet entwickelt, um die dunkele Kopfpartie erkennen zu können) hochgeladen, man kann wirklich sehen, daß die Stirnzeichnung an den Augen endet. Insofern die Sache wohl klar, es muß sich um Sympetrum striolatum handeln. Liebe Grüße --Loz (talk) 14:26, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Ja, das neue Bild macht die Sache wohl klar. Was die Seltenheit in Norddeutschland betrifft, scheint das eine mittlerweile etwas überholte Aussage zu sein — wie diverse andere mediterrane Arten dringt offenbar auch die Große Heidelibelle seit einigen Jahren weiter nach Norden vor. Der Klimawandel lässt schön grüßen! Ich finde sie im Wendland jedenfalls ziemlich häufig und wundere mich insofern schon etwas über die (noch inoffizielle) neuere niedersächsische Rote-Liste-Einstufung der Art als "gefährdet". -- Gruß, Fice (talk) 18:58, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Hab das Bild neu hochgeladen als Image:Sympetrum striolatum 1(loz).jpg, Dank noch mal für Deine Aufmerksamkeit. Das sich die Verbreitungsareale innerhalb doch recht kurzer Zeit bei den mediterranen Arten deutlich ausweiten ist ja wirklich ein spannendes Thema. Vielleicht sollte das noch in den Artikel? Gruß ----Loz (talk) 12:14, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Dazu müsste man erstmal zitierfähige Quellen zur Hand haben — wir sollen bei WP ja schließlich keine Theoriefindung anhand persönlicher Beobachtungen betreiben ;-) Meine subjektiven Erfahrungen dazu sind z. B. auch nur sehr zufällig und kurzfristig gewonnen und beziehen sich auf einen relativ kleinen und auch noch wärmebegünstigten Raum in Norddeutschland. -- Fice (talk) 17:32, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Ich weiß, ich weiß, würd mich ja nie trauen, ohne Beleg einen, noch dazu bereits exzellenten, Artikel im Biologie-Raum zu ändern. Das sich die Verbreitungsareale bei vielen Libellenarten verändern ist jedoch, mein ich, unterdessen vielfach beobachtet, vielleicht gibt´s ja bald zitierfähige Quellen. --Loz (talk) 10:37, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sympetrum striolatum 3(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi for sure. Lycaon 17:36, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sympetrum striolatum 1(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Lycaon 17:36, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coenagrion hastulatum 2(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 13:44, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coenagrion puella 1(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good details --Mbdortmund 13:44, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Libellula quadrimaculata 2(loz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good and useful --Mbdortmund 13:42, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coenagrion hastulatum 3(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. Lycaon 16:36, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coenagrion puella 2(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Mbdortmund 00:29, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enallagma cyathigerum 2(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Mbdortmund 00:29, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enallagma cyathigerum 3(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Mbdortmund 00:29, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coenagrion puella 3(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good! QI --George Chernilevsky 08:37, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leucorrhinia rubicunda 2(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --kallerna 12:32, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrrhosoma nymphula 2(loz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good, sharp and nice --George Chernilevsky 11:39, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lestes sponsa 2(loz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 11:40, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sympetrum danae 3(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 10:15, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sympetrum danae 5(loz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and very informative --George Chernilevsky 10:15, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Loz!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 18:47, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

• Image:LBT118(loz).jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:LBT121(loz).jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:LBT117(loz).jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:LBT122(loz).jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Diptera 1(loz).jpg was uncategorized on 31 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:50, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Photographers Blackbelt

		THE PHOTOGRAPHER'S BLACKBELT
		I hereby award at you this Photographers Blackbelt for your outstanding and excellent pictures. --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:34, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anax Imperator 2(loz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent --George Chernilevsky 16:35, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Anax Imperator 2(loz).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anax Imperator 2(loz).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lestes viridis 1(loz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great work! Multimotyl 11:34, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sympetrum striolatum 4(loz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great work! Multimotyl 11:34, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enallagma cyathigerum 4(loz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments excellent -- Archaeodontosaurus 18:09, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sympetrum striolatum 5(loz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me - Darius Baužys 14:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Enallagma cyathigerum 4(loz).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Enallagma cyathigerum 4(loz).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 00:02, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coenagrion hastulatum 4(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --George Chernilevsky 19:27, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coenagrion puella 4(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 09:18, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ischnura elegans 3(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Quartl 14:26, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ischnura elegans 5(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 13:57, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ischnura elegans 4(loz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 13:58, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enallagma cyathigerum 6(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 13:57, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enallagma cyathigerum 8(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perfect --George Chernilevsky 13:56, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Enallagma_cyathigerum_8(loz).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Enallagma_cyathigerum_8(loz).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ischnura elegans 7(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 10:26, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ischnura elegans 6(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good. --Cayambe 10:26, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Biodiversity Photo - route

Hello L. B. Tettenborn

My name is Rita Neves. I work in Câmara Municipal de Lisboa, that is a Public Organism in Portugal. Actually, we are working on a road book of Biodiversity of Lisbon, for which we are going to produce a panel and a brochure. We found your photos on Wikimedia Commons and liked specially one of them very much, so we would like to know if you could allow us to use your photos, for free, to publish on this project, knowing that the brochure of will be for free distribution to everyone. The photo we are considering to use are the following:

Troglodytes_troglodytes http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Troglodytes_troglodytes%28loz%29.jpg

The brochure will have four brackets. - Broochura a pocket to take the route - A brochure to present the day of inauguration

- Schedules for species identification
- Panels that will be fixed in the Land

As i said the Free Access will be everything :)

If you are the author and provide us that photo, we will refer your name in the bibliografy and we need to know what´s the name you want on the bibliography? L. B. Tettenborn ? If it´s possible please respond to ritasoraia2001@hotmail.com or rita.neves@cm-lisboa.pt or here on Wikimedia.

Thank you very much. Our best regards

responding by mail--Loz (talk) 16:09, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ischnura elegans 10(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Quartl 12:41, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melanargia galathea 1(loz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Could do with a bit more brightness? --Quartl 12:41, 9 September 2010 (UTC)  Done--Loz 13:59, 9 September 2010 (UTC) Ok to me now. --Quartl 14:57, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gastropacha quercifolia 1(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The butterfly is captured very well, but the blurry rock in front is a bit disturbing. Maybe crop it more from the right? --Quartl 12:41, 9 September 2010 (UTC)  Done I cropped it to a square. Better now?--Loz 13:59, 9 September 2010 (UTC) Better, but the crop at the left side is a bit tight now, a bit more room there and I can support. --Quartl 14:57, 9 September 2010 (UTC)  DoneOk, is besser--Loz 15:37, 9 September 2010 (UTC) Jetzt ist gut :-). --Quartl 16:16, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ischnura elegans 11(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:00, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platycnemis pennipes 1(loz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:00, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lestes sponsa 1(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments for me ok --LutzBruno 17:56, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lestes sponsa 3(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Avenue 09:12, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coenagrion puella 5(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 10:31, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platycnemis pennipes 4(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 08:02, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platycnemis pennipes 5(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very nice, good quality, lightning, composition and a very good DOF, best of these two --Carschten 20:41, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lestes sponsa 4(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 08:08, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coenagrion pulchellum 2(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and informative. Even though the wings of one of the insects are out of focus, the general sharpness seems ok IMO. Andrei Stroe 12:46, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ischnura elegans 12(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good sharpness on the wings.--Andrei Stroe 21:14, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ischnura elegans 15(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gut --George Chernilevsky 18:10, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ischnura elegans 13(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gut --George Chernilevsky 18:11, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Another quality image

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passer italiae 1 (loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 15:33, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

I nominated it: you've made many more great images than you've thought were quality images! —innotata 16:55, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks a lot :-) --Loz (talk) 10:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erythromma najas 1(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perfect. --Saffron Blaze 18:06, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erythromma najas 2(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perfecto to me. Congratulations--Lmbuga 21:18, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erythromma najas 4(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also perfect. --Saffron Blaze 18:09, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erythromma najas 5(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 18:09, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coenagrion pulchellum 4(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 17:13, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ischnura elegans 16(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality, nice capture. --Quartl 20:26, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ischnura elegans 17(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 17:45, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ischnura elegans 18(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good--Holleday 18:22, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ischnura elegans 19(loz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good--Holleday 18:23, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Palloptera muliebris

Hi Loz, I renamed your file as requested, and created the category (it was a redlink). I've putted the Category:Palloptera muliebris under the Category:Pallopteridae but i'm not a specialist, may be you can confirm me this is ok. Have a nice day. PierreSelim (talk) 08:36, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

hey, thank you, although I'm not a specialist too, the category Pallopteridae is properly in any case. --Loz (talk) 20:44, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Re:I think that's a female

Hello, Loz:

I have changed the image description to female. Thank you so much for the help. I was not sure whether it is a male or female. Happy to see you like my pictures. Thanks again. Regards. --JDP90 (talk) 05:59, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

:-) Thanks for the quick change. --Loz (talk) 07:16, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

GFDL

There is a discussion at Commons_talk:Featured_picture_candidates#Proposal:_Change_to_FP_criteria_for_new_nominations:_disallow_.22GFDL_1.2_only.22_and_.22GFDL_1.2_and_an_NC-only_license.22; please participate. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 09:59, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:07, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 20:36, 16 June 2013 (UTC)