Tbhotch

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Tbhotch!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

File:ElectricidadJesse&Joy.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:ElectricidadJesse&Joy.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Okki (talk) 02:19, 19 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

MetroDF Línea 1.svg edit

Hi, MetroDF Línea 1.svg file has no copyright problems because not using the colors or fonts that use the Sistema de Transporte Colectivo del Distrito Federal, Mexico. Please verify the graphic identity manual, thanks, --Sofree 21:21, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Trademarkia_Logo.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Trademarkia_Logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

GrapedApe (talk) 01:57, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol given edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Morning Sunshine (talk) 07:57, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Jay-Z and Beyoncé.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Jay-Z and Beyoncé.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Truu (talk) 20:38, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Opel logo 2011.png edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

{{AutotranslatFile:El Metro de la CDMX distribuirá 1 millón de cubrebocas a usuarios.jpeg e|1=File:Opel logo 2011.png|2=|3=|base=Idw}} Woodcutterty (talk) 18:15, 1 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

My talk page. edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Okay, my talk page already is full of reports, I see in pages watched. Pablodiego15 (talk) 21:53, 23 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Awkwardintertitle.png edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Awkwardintertitle.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

77.179.133.216 22:42, 5 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Football jersey over shoulder pads.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Football jersey over shoulder pads.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ytoyoda (talk) 02:53, 7 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:IPN Seal.png edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:IPN Seal.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Gusama Romero (talk) 20:56, 24 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Apple logo edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I notice you've been adding {{PD-US-not renewed}}, {{Apple}} (which is an alias for {{APSL}} i.e. the Apple Public Source License), and {{Trademarked}} to a bunch of images that contain an Apple logo. While I can be persuaded that "PD-US-not renewed" and "Trademarked" apply to the Apple logo, I do not believe Apple has ever released their logo under the Apple Public Source License license. Where did you find out that the Apple logo is covered by the APSL? —RP88 01:26, 23 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Done Removed. I didn't know that applied to specific logos. Sorry for the confusion. Tbhotch™ 04:36, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Debates edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hola, quería hablarte acá de manera personal y más directa en nuestro idioma de origen, ya que en las discusiones de borrado de archivos lo hacemos en inglés. Más allá de que borren o no los archivos (que son circunstancias), me molesta y mucho el tono arrogante y descalificador que utilizás para dirigirte. Me gustaría mucho que bajaras el nivel de arrogancia que venís utilizando (me refiero específicamente a la discusión sobre el logo del Real Madrid) porque de seguir así será realmente difícil seguir un debate en términos razonables.

Esto es una comunidad en la cual el respeto por el otro es fundamental, y (al menos en idioma inglés) tu tono suena muy chocante y soberbio; quizás no lo seas, pero es así como se leen tus argumentaciones. Espero que entiendas lo que te estoy planteando, no me interesa -como te dije anteriormente- que me borren un archivo o dos, ni perder una discusión (que ya he pasado por esto y no es la muerte de nadie), pero sí me interesa mantener un nivel de debate que encuadre dentro del nivel de respeto necesario por la opinión del otro, sin presumir de mala fe todo el tiempo.

Te comento esto acá porque, como te dije antes, es a título personal, solamente entre vos y yo. Si tu tono no es de arrogancia y quizás yo percibí algo que no es, pido disculpas por eso, pero nunca llevo ningún debate a título personal y trato de ser muy respetuoso con el otro, sepa o no de lo que está hablando. Saludos. - Fma12 (talk) 21:07, 28 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Opel logo 2011.png edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Opel logo 2011.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

77.254.61.186 14:51, 19 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Opel logo 2011.png edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Opel logo 2011.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

87.105.137.253 18:39, 30 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Opel logo 2011.png edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Opel logo 2011.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

87.105.137.253 18:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Deletions nominations edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, please only nominate a file for deletion with the 'Nominate for deletion' link from the left menu, you are creating a mess. And for the Lotus F1 Team logo, this is obviously {{PD-textlogo}}, so you may wish not to waste your time on a useless deletion nomination - Jcb (talk) 21:48, 24 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Threshold of originality#United_Kingdom, and I'm not even an admin to know that you are approving a copyright violation. Tbhotch™ 21:51, 24 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

And manually nominating an image for deletion is not "a mess". Tbhotch™ 21:54, 24 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Well, you created an incomplete nomination at least, while the 'nominate for deletion' link takes care of every step. We have those scripts in place to help users following correct procedure without needing to know all the details. Jcb (talk) 21:57, 24 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Palmolive logo.jpg edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Palmolive logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 08:14, 29 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Turn Off the Lights screenshot.png edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Turn Off the Lights screenshot.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Codename Lisa (talk) 13:35, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Buddy Valastro at the 2011 New York International Auto Show.jpg edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Buddy Valastro at the 2011 New York International Auto Show.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:11, 4 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Saskia Cohen-Tanugi edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Dear Tbhotch, Thanks for notifying us that the lady standing beside Sean Connery wasnˈt Micheline Roquebrune. I agree. But are you really sure that this lady is Saskia Cohen-Tanugi? As Cohen Tanugi was born in 1959, she would have been 24 years old in 1983. I checked what other options there are. I doubt if Barbara Carrera was in Amsterdam. The photo was used in this newspaper, but without complete caption. Do you have any other confirmation about her being Cohen Tanugi? Vysotsky (talk) 19:49, 17 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Vysotsky: The source given in the photograph is the Nationaal Archief, which mentions her, and the woman in the picture truly resembles other similar pictures of her. Tbhotch™ 20:13, 17 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

I've uploaded ca. 1500 photos from the collections of Nationaal Archief, and I changed the metadata of and added categories to several thousands photographs from this particular collection (Anefo). I have also written two articles about Anefo, so I know the collection relatively well. 95% of the descriptions are OK, but because it is a large collection (350,000 Anefo photographs) there are also several hundred files with incomplete or incorrect metadata. I just wonder if the person in this photo really is Saskia Cohen-Tanugi -especially considering her birth date. That's also why I added the photo to the French Wikipedia article about her, hoping this will lead to a reaction. I'll wait patiently. Vysotsky (talk) 21:05, 17 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:El Desafio de la Raza - Rodrigo Arenas Berancourt.png edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hola! Esta foto si es mía, pero esta es la versión original. Quien la modifico y la subió es un novato, no sabe categorizar y tampoco como indicar de donde tomó la foto. --SajoR (talk) 19:45, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Xeimt.png edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Xeimt.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Adamant1 (talk) 06:01, 11 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Edit to Mexico threshold of originality section edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi. I'm wondering where you got the information from that "In simple terms, if the company uses ".com" on their website, they are not covered as an organization. If they use a ".org", they function as an organization." I'm not aware of what domain name an organization uses having anything to do with the law, anyone can register a .com or .org domain name regardless of what type of organization they are anyway, and from what I can tell the copyright statue doesn't differentiate between types of organizations either. Plus, I see that there was no discussion of the edit on the articles talk page before you made it. Given all that, I'm inclined to revert the edit until there is sufficient evidence and a consensus to make the changes. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:39, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Just an FYI, brands can also be companies. For instance, Nike is a Footwear manufacturing company and a brand of shoes. If you don't even know simple things like that then your time would probably be better spent on other things besides swearing at random people in DRs. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:34, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Adamant1: have you ever heard the phrase en:Wikipedia:stick? Stop taking everything personal, especially on legal thing. Tbhotch™ 06:12, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

TimedText file for the pronunciation files edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Tbhotch! I would like to tell you that there is a {{Pronunciation file}} template on Wikimedia Commons which contains a special IPA field, as you could guess, for adding words' transcriptions in the file description. There are several reasons to put the IPAs for the words in the IPA fields and several reasons not to put them into TimedText files for one specific language. Would you mind to tell me what do you think about at all? All the best wishes, Pacha Tchernof (talk) 14:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Pacha Tchernof: I was unaware of the remaining parameters. I'll replace the TT with those parameters. Tbhotch™ 19:37, 25 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your understanding, Tbhotch! I hope you could request deletion of those TimedText pages for not showing it as an example to other editors and, as could be following, for not expanding this way of using TimedText pages. Thanks! Have a great end of the week! Pacha Tchernof (talk) 20:34, 25 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Long-term abuse edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Regarding the uploads of Loki4050, please note that "Long-term abuse" is not a valid reason for speedy deletion; we don't have w:WP:G5 here like on English Wikipedia. Please update your rationales to include an actual criterion on COM:CSD, or convert them to COM:DR if no criterion applies. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:10, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Deletion requests edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, Please read the criteria for speedy and regular deletion requests before creating more. "Long-term abuse" is not a valid reason for speedy deletion for a file in use uploaded 6 months ago. Thanks, Yann (talk) 15:46, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Imágenes edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hola Tbhotch quisiera comentar que si en vez de eliminar las imágenes de Casanova50, ¿No sería mejor revertirlas como lo has venido haciendo?, te preguntarás: ¿Cómo te enteraste de este asunto?, pues me enteré porque quería ver que imagenes había subido el usuario mencionado anteriormente y vi habían que habían sido nominadas para eliminación y porque yo había nominado algunas imágenes para que fueran valiosas y vi en mi discusión que las habían cambiado, no se si tu lo veas como mejor opción.-- Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please)

@Aurelio de Sandoval: Algunas de esas imágenes, por ejemplo File:Tun Tun en Okey Mr. Pancho (1981) (cropped).jpg, carecen de imagen previa porque su imagen real se ubica en otro archivo. Tbhotch™ 00:48, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sugiero que subas la imagen del lugar de donde la recortaron, aunque no tenga buena calidad.-- Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please)

Si pudieses tomar dos de cada una mucho mejor.-- Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please)

Imágenes de la pandemia edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Oye Tbhotch aprovechando de que has tomado fotos de la CDMX, te quiero pedir un favor (si tu quieres), ¿Podrías tomar fotos como estas, pero de esta pandemia?

la de los estudiante la encuentro algo difícil no se si tengas acceso a una escuela, pero las primeras dos si quisiera que las subieras y las usaré en el artículo de la Pandemia de Covid 19 en México.-- Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please)

@Aurelio de Sandoval: Técnicamente puedo hacerlo, pero prefiero no tomar fotografías con terceros o de terceros sin su permiso, independientemente de que sea válido hacerlo. Tampoco quiero ser identificado por terceros debido a diversas amenazas que he recibido en el pasado. Tbhotch™ 00:58, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Podrías censurar sus caras en photoshop y así no habría problemas anque no se vea estético.-- Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please)

@Tbhotch: Como dije antes si es el problema así como lo mencionaste, porqué no censuras sus caras en photoshop, yo tengo algunas imágenes que censuré porque temía que apareciesen imágenes con copyright.--~~ Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 01:06, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Aurelio de Sandoval: No tengo Photoshop y censurar los rostros le quita valor el enciclopédico a la imagen porque es el punto principal del trabajo. Pero puedo subir imágenes de otros sitios web como Flickr o de sitios web de Ciudad de México que puedan relacionarse. Si existe una categoría, puedo poblarla. Tbhotch™ 01:11, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Tbhotch: ¿Si son de esta pandemia y como y similares a las de esta galería?.-- Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please)

@Aurelio de Sandoval: Algunas son relevantes, otras no tanto, pero en general cumplen con el propósito de las tres fotos que anexaste. Depende de qué tipo de archivo busques. Tbhotch™ 01:24, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Gracias, por favor si puedieses subirlas es que la única PC que tengo la usan algunos de los integrantes de mi familia para tareas y no puedo usarla, yo me comunico en Wikipedia con celular.-- Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please)

@Aurelio de Sandoval: Sin problema, si quieres de ese enlace escoge las imágenes que necesites, me mandas los enlaces y las subo. De cualquier forma he visto varias fotos en sitios de dependencias de la CDMX con gente (principalmente del Metro y Metrobús) que de igual forma puedo subir. Tbhotch™ 01:33, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Tbhotch: Muy bien,gracias por su ayuda, me mencionaste que que has visto fotos en sitios de la CDMX con gente en Metro y Metrebús, si pudieses subirlas por favor y gracias de nuevo también hice un encargo de este tipo de imágenes con otro usuario llamado ProtoplasmaKid (aunque no se si el tenga posibilidades) pero bueno, voy a elegir alguna de las imágenes y las colocaré en el collage del artículo de la Pandemia de Covid 19 en México y tal vez cuando pueda usar mi PC usar las imágenes que subas tú y el otro usuario mencionado anteriormente imágenes en el montaje fotográfico del mismo artículo en otros idiomas.-- Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please)

FoP Mexico edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago7 comments2 people in discussion

Hola Tbhotch tengo unas preguntas si pego afuera de mi casa un billete de México o un imagen impresa del mismo y le tomo foto y la subo acá, ¿La libertad de panorama de México me lo permite? y si pego una imagen impresa como de éste personaje , ¿La libertad de panorama me lo permite?.-- Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please)

@Aurelio de Sandoval: Nuestras leyes están tan pobremente escritas que técnicamente hablando eso es legalmente válido, pero solo desde el punto artístico. En todo caso yo buscaría billetes que claramente digan "Falso" o "Muestra" por cuestiones ajenas a los derechos de autor. Tbhotch™ 17:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Tbhotch: Gracias por responder y si consigo una imagen del billete y por computadora le coloco falso o muestra, ¿Aplicaría el FoP Mexico? y otra pregunta si pego una imagen impresa de éste personaje y lo pego afuera de mi casa, ¿También aplica el FoP Mexico y la puedo subir acá?.-- Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please)

@Aurelio de Sandoval: Lo primero se llama falsificación y se penaliza con 12 años de prisión en México. La cuestión con la libertad de panorama es que fue diseñada para evitar que los artistas tomaran acciones legales contra cualquiera que publicara o tomara fotografías o videos de sus obras ubicadas en espacios públicos. Las obras en sí siguen protegidas por derechos de autor y la persona que toma la fotografía o video no es autora del objeto en cuestión. La ley no fue diseñada para que cualquier ciudadano tomara objetos con derechos de autor, los colocara en lugares públicos y les tome fotografías para evitar penalizaciones. Aunque es legalmente aceptable, es éticamente reprobable tanto en México como en Estados Unidos y como en el país de origen de las imágenes en cuestión (en este caso, asumo que la imagen proviene de Japón y en Japón no existe libertad de panorama para objetos en 2D). Si bien puedes hacerlo de manera técnica (para propósitos personales ajenos a Commons), hacerlo en Commons a la larga lo único que ocasionará será que se determine que la libertad de panorama es legalmente problemática si comienzan a existir múltiples avisos de DMCA. De hecho existe una advertencia al respecto: "La política actual de Wikimedia Commons es aceptar fotos de obras de arte y esculturas que están cubiertos por la libertad de panorama en su país de origen. Esta política puede cambiar en el futuro, en función de lo observado en discusiones de la comunidad y la nueva acción legal". No soy abogado pero lo llamaría dolo "no ilegal" y por el bien de las fotografías que ya existen y las que existirán, es mejor el no abusar de vacíos legales. Tbhotch™ 17:07, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Tbhotch Está bien, gracias por responder y aclarar mis dudas.

Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 17:11, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Tbhotch Si entendí bien y en pocas palabras es: Si puedo, pero no debo.

Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 17:16, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Aurelio de Sandoval: En pocas palabras, sí. Lo mejor es esperar que algún tercero lo haga y que sea lo suficientemente pequeño para que el principio de minimis aplique. Por cierto, hoy es mi día libre, si tienes algunos enlaces de las imágenes que te había comentado puedo subirlas hoy, sino tendría que ser hasta el próximo jueves. Tbhotch™ 17:29, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Tbhotch Me habías comentado que habías visto varias fotos en sitios de dependencias de la CDMX con gente (principalmente del Metro y Metrobús) (me imagino que son de esta pandemia actual), por favor, ¿Podrías subir las imágenes que vite del Metro y Metrobús?.

Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 17:35, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Aurelio de Sandoval: Subí algunas imágenes medio relacionadas pero estuve revisando Flickr y las categorías y muchas fotografías ya las subieron. Metro, iglesia, "escuela". En la Category:COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico están. No sé exactamente qué tipo de archivos buscas. Tbhotch™ 01:49, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Bueno, gracias por ayudarme.-- Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please)

Usuarios edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hola compañero Tbhotch disculpa las molestias quisiera pedirte si conoces a algún usuario de la Ciudad de México que suba fotos y con el que me pueda contactar para que suba imágenes como éstas como las de las que hablamos anteriormente

Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 04:05, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Aurelio de Sandoval: solo sé de Eneas y ProtoplasmaKid. Tbhotch™ 16:15, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Tbhotch: Está bien, gracias.--Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 19:10, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

¿Aplica el FoP? edit

Latest comment: 10 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hola Tbhotch no se si recuerdas la conversación que tuvimos si el FoP de México aplicaría si afuera de mi casa pegara billetes, les tomara fotos y los subo aquí, pues ya las tomé y subí, preguntas: ¿Están bien que permanezcan aquí, o las nomino para eliminación?

Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 01:16, 16 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Aurelio de Sandoval: No, porque no eres el autor de los billetes y Banxico debe autorizar cualquier reproducción de billetes reales. Tbhotch™ 14:43, 16 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Tbhotch Gracias, nomínalos para su eoiminación entonces por favor ya que estoy en android. Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 15:02, 16 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Estación Lechería - Puente de conexión.jpg edit

Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:Estación Lechería - Puente de conexión.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Estación Lechería - Puente de conexión.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 06:05, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Mexicable Indios Verdes (Febrero 2024).jpg edit

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:Mexicable Indios Verdes (Febrero 2024).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Mexicable Indios Verdes (Febrero 2024).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

File:La Joven de Amajac (Febrero 2024).jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 04:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Avenida Hermenegildo Galeana, Tultitlán.jpg edit

Latest comment: 25 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:Avenida Hermenegildo Galeana, Tultitlán.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Avenida Hermenegildo Galeana, Tultitlán.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 04:41, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic