User talk:Zanimum/Archive 01

Tinker Bell, a CC find.

2005

Hi - thanks for uploading images to the commons. Please see Commons:Criteria for inclusion for information what images can be but here and which not. I noticed you labeled the images you put here as Public Domain, which you can do only if you a) created them yourself or b) the creator placed them in the public domain. If either one is the case, please state so explicitely on the images description page. Also, the description sais "photo by Nicholas Moreau" - if that is you, plase make this clear. If you (or he) wants that this credit is given when the photo is used, do not put them in the public domain but use a "copyleft" license - see Commons:Copyright tags for "good" and "bad" licenses.

Furthermore, images on the commons should be useful for everyone, which they are only if the can be found by others. To allow this, please put your images on a gallery page and/or in one or more appropriate categories. Thank you.

For more information, have a lookt at the Commons:Community Portal (available in many language).

Regardes -- Duesentrieb 03:27, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Image:Quarto v002 pl.pdf

Image deletion warning

Image:Quarto v002 pl.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Image:Quarto v002 ru.pdf

Image deletion warning

Image:Quarto v002 ru.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Thuresson 27 June 2005 22:11 (UTC)

Image:Quarto v002 cs.pdf

Image deletion warning

Image:Quarto v002 cs.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Thuresson 13:47, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Places toronto ttc marge.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Places toronto ttc marge.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Fb78 18:01, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Image:Jordanhill station, Glasgow, location map.PNG

How was Image:Jordanhill station, Glasgow, location map.PNG created? What is it based on; is the source public domain? Reply on w:User talk:Superm401 please. Superm401 03:19, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Category:2006 Time 100

Hi Zanimum,

On these images you have written, Jimmy Wales took her to the event's red carpet, she donated the rights to the episode into the GFDL. Do you have some evidence of where that's been recorded? I can't find any statement like that on the Rocketboom site. In fact the About page says all Rocketboom content is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA, which is a non-free license for the Commons. If that's true, these images will have to be deleted. So do you have a public URL, or an email you can forward to permissions@wikimedia.org ? Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 09:19, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

I've forwarded a message by Jimmy from the Communications Committee to verify this; although the list is officially confidential, there's no private information in the message that I can see the other members at odds against. This was the special condition that Jimmy place on his invitation for letting Cogdon come, we were originally planning on just having a still photographer at the event. -- Zanimum 12:46, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

OK. You should get some kind of ID back from OTRS; then there's a template {{PermissionOTRS}} which takes that ID as a parameter. Since there are so many screencaps I wouldn't bother putting it on each individual image, but please put it on the category page. Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 13:20, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Commons:Photography event calendar

Hi Zanium, it would be good to work with things like the Oscars for this... we just started it up. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 03:02, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Illustrated Wikipedia, sorted by category

What are you aming at this page?--Bo-rhein-sieg 21:28, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Academy Awards afterparty CUN Luenell.jpg

Great image. But please, ask the photographer to send the email to permission at wikimedia dot org. An email to you is no good as a proof that some image is free. Please, please, please, read en:WP:COPYREQ so that good images like this don't have to be deleted in the future. Best regards, --Abu badali 06:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

They are marked as CC-BY here... http://flickr.com/photos/johnmueller/403297538/ , is that acceptable? Is there anyway he could send a single message stating that any images, past or future, using {{Cc-by-2.5-mueller}} are indeed CC-BY-2.5? -- Zanimum 18:55, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Humm... I somehow missed the flickr licensing. Sorry. For licensing it under cc-by-2.5, as it's not supported by flickr, I believe it would be ok an otrs message or simply a comment on the flickr image, by the author himself, stating something on the lines of "I hereby release this image under the cc-by-2.5 license...", etc. I link to the license text on the comment would surely help. --Abu badali 20:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

I've sent a message he sent me, clarifying his license, to the permission feed. -- Zanimum 16:24, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Ann Coulter

Hi Zanimum. The Ann Coulter picture you uploaded (Image:Jimmy Wales photo of Ann Coulter.jpg) was already here since November of last year (see Image:Ann Coulter.jpg). However, the cropped version you created was not. I´ve ask for a speedy deletion of the duplicated file, sorry. Best regards, --JLCA 17:38, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Photographs by John Mueller

Hey Zanimum, I noticed that you worked on some of the text related to Category:John Mueller. Some of the image indicate that the permission can be viewed at Category:John Mueller. I don't see anything. Am I overlooking something? --Iamunknown 05:11, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

I've sent the message to permissions right now, to get the tag placed on. -- Zanimum 16:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Gerard-Kennedy-andrewandnicole.jpg

Hi, please use the image talk page to paste the permission you received, including dates, names and the nature of the permission and so on. Regards, Thuresson 20:36, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Billboards at dundas square.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Billboards at dundas square.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from BryanBot. 20:27, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Audio editing

I'm willing to do some audio editing. YOu can contact me at n:User_talk:Markie.

Image:Curiosityperfume.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Curiosityperfume.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Herr Kriss 18:12, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Academy Awards afterparty CUN Noureen DeWulf.gif

Image deletion warning

Image:Academy Awards afterparty CUN Noureen DeWulf.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from User:DRBot. 20:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Bookaneers

Replied on my talk page. Rklawton 00:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Leiabox murray02.jpg

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Leiabox murray02.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Dodo 21:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

This isn't a copyvio, I simply forgot to update the Wikimedia Commons Flickr tool to have the right number. I've updated the link to the original image. -- Zanimum 13:26, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes, it is. To be precise, it's a derivative work. All the Muppets are (c) Jim Henson, I'm afraid. --Dodo 15:23, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

So then where do I upload the image? To Wikipedia as fair use? But the thing is, only part of the image is fair use, the rest isn't. -- Zanimum 19:34, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Well, the part of the image without copyright can stay. But maybe it is not very interesting... --Dodo 21:05, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Sesame stage show

Wow, great stuff. I've added it to Sesame Street. By any chance did you take more photos of the show? -- Zanimum 16:06, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Maybe a hundred or so. Some individual performers/muppets as well as the fish and squid kites. I can't imagine where they'd be useful, though. Rklawton 00:12, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

They'd be useful on Wikipedia, based on the fact we don't have free images of most of the characters. Sure, these aren't the characters themselves, but they're relatively close. And other than Oscar the Grouch and Kermit (both of whom are in the Smithsonian) there's no free license images of any of the Sesame Street Muppets or Muppet Show Muppets.

They'd also be great on muppet.wikia.com -- it's also GFDL-licensed, and editable. I also contribute to that site, and we have 14000 pages, among them 89 different stage show characters. Many of them show the different versions of each character, based on the different year or purpose.

Would it be possible to get just a few pictures, even? And were there any Muppets other than those who appear on stage in the photo you uploaded? Any help would be greatly appreciated! -- Zanimum 18:39, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

If I upload them to Commons, would they be accessible to these other wikis without having to download/upload them again? I'm three projects behind at the moment, but I think this is something I can get to over the weekend. Oh, and also note that while I'd upload these as CC Attribution ShareAlike 2.5, the characters themselves are trademarked and their use would be greatly restricted by their owners. You probably knew this, but I feel obliged to point these things out just in case. Rklawton 00:43, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

No, they wouldn't be instantly accessible, but I'd just let Muppet Wiki know that the images were available to download, then reupload to that site. And you don't have to worry about the Muppet Wiki trying to wrongfully exploit the images; a bunch of Muppeteers and the like contribute to the site, so everybody makes sure they fully respect the companies copyrights and trademarks. -- Zanimum 14:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Russ Meyer and Roger Ebert.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Russ Meyer and Roger Ebert.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from User:DRBot. 20:28, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Carlb-penny1967centennial-01.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Carlb-penny1967centennial-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Jusjih 15:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ironing guinness 0357.JPG

Can you crop that image? Its taking up unnecessary space in the article it is on. FullMetal Falcon 15:54, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Amber MacArthur.jpg

Is this logged with OTRS? If not, it probably should be, given its provenance, and if it is, that info should be added to the page. -Hit bull, win steak 22:00, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Chris_Crocker.JPG

Image deletion warning

Image:Chris_Crocker.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Thuresson 19:24, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Amber_MacArthur.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Amber_MacArthur.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Cecil 22:58, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Toronto_ipod_queen_street.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Toronto_ipod_queen_street.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko 17:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Sesame Place Backstage-004.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sesame Place Backstage-004.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Patstuart (talk) 07:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Parade-003.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Parade-003.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Patstuart (talk) 07:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Parade-004.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Parade-004.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Patstuart (talk) 07:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Sesame Place Parade-007.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sesame Place Parade-007.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Patstuart (talk) 07:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Sesame Place Parade-001.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sesame Place Parade-001.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Patstuart (talk) 07:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Sesame Place Concert-013.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sesame Place Concert-013.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Patstuart (talk) 07:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Sesame Place Concert-005.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sesame Place Concert-005.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Patstuart (talk) 07:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Sesame Place Backstage-003.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sesame Place Backstage-003.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Patstuart (talk) 07:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Sea World event

Thanks for contacting me, and I may be interested in doing this but I have a few questions first. When would this event take place? I have to make sure it doesn't conflict with school-related events. The Craigslist ad states that Wikinews has press access, does that mean that I wouldn't have to pay? I'm a typical poor college student and can't do the normal ticket price right now. If the event is at a convenient time for me and doesn't require a ticket purchase, I would more than likely be able to go. Also, is the 600x800 picture quality what is desired or would higher quality be okay (I have a 6.1 mp and can get higher quality images if desired)? Finally, if I were to do this, would I be able to license the pictures under my user name (I prefer to keep my actual name separate)? Again, thanks for expressing your interest, and I hope that I can help. --Nehrams2020 23:02, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Collections_canada_PA-197391.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Collections_canada_PA-197391.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Rob 22:02, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Premier_binns_of_PEI.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Premier_binns_of_PEI.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. ShakataGaNai ^{^_^} 07:40, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Files by RobinWong

Hi Zanimum, im unsure about your reuploded version on files of Robin Wong like File:Duff 4.jpg: Your uploads are in a higher resolution, the authors release of the low resolution images (541×360 px mostly) means that this version of the image free, but it does not affect the higher resolution of the work published in the photostreams on his websites. So if you copied the higher quality versions from his website this is a violation of copyright and we should revert it. Thanks for your answer, --Martin H. (talk) 20:36, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Los Angeles photog needed Sunday evening

"I've got access to an Oscar party red carpet, anyone know anyone that could photograph at it?"

hello,

Finally, we were able to make photos for this event? They are already on Commons? Okki (talk) 08:48, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi Okki, yes, photos were taken. The best ones are already online, but I'll be adding more later. Category:2009_Children_Uniting_Nations_Academy_Awards_viewing_party -- Nick Moreau (talk) 15:48, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

DM and FoP

Yah, DM is an incredibly helpful principle. It only stretches so far, but it gives an uploader piece of mind in a lot of cases. The FoP template is handy if only because the law differs so much from country to country. --skeezix1000 (talk) 17:32, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Mark Cuban moves hand.jpg

File:Mark Cuban moves hand.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Leoboudv (talk) 22:12, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Category:2009 Children Uniting Nations Academy Awards viewing party

Hi Zanimum, most images in that category dont have a license template. --Martin H. (talk) 21:24, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Nm_toronto_chumcity_coors_light.jpg

File:Nm_toronto_chumcity_coors_light.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Skeezix1000 (talk) 15:28, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jappalang (talk) 03:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 8f7423bcadd193db82d4bd328202fec1

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Olek_artist_Dumbo_row.jpg

File:Olek_artist_Dumbo_row.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GrapedApe (talk) 13:47, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Olek 100pc Acrylic ABC Biennial.jpg

File:Olek 100pc Acrylic ABC Biennial.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GrapedApe (talk) 13:57, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Olek_artist_near_works.jpg

File:Olek_artist_near_works.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GrapedApe (talk) 02:56, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

2011 royal tour

I thought I was going crazy! You fixed the caps in the category title so quickly after I had categorized the images, I thought I'd screwed up and categorized images in a different category than the one I'd created. I just now realized that you had made the correction. Sorry, it was an inadvertent series of reverts - I was using HotCat to correct what I thought were my mistakes. You are probably right with the caps. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 15:41, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I've undone my "corrections" of your actual corrections. Sorry about that. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 15:47, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Remix Monkeys Dance Clan group pose.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Remix Monkeys Dance Clan group pose.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:17, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

They had sent me one email regarding the licensing, but it included an image that I advised them not to release. I'm waiting for them to resend the email, with just the one image license release noted. -- Nick Moreau (talk) 18:03, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

If I were you, I'd send the Email along anyway. The public will never see the Email sent to OTRS, and that way we will have an OTRS ticket on it, and can get rid of the permission tag. SchuminWeb (Talk) 10:02, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

I've forwarded a new permission message from the Remix Monkeys. -- Nick Moreau (talk) 16:56, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

I've tagged this as OTRS pending, so we should be good to go for now. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:09, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Cool, also OTRS has now linked to ticket #2011071510012792. -- Nick Moreau (talk) 20:58, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Drayton Manors Morphsuit Mayhem promotion 2.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Drayton Manors Morphsuit Mayhem promotion 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Drayton Manors Morphsuit Mayhem promotion 2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:10, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Drayton Manors Morphsuit Mayhem promotion 1.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Drayton Manors Morphsuit Mayhem promotion 1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Drayton Manors Morphsuit Mayhem promotion 1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:10, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello. Both File:Drayton Manors Morphsuit Mayhem promotion 2.jpg and File:Drayton Manors Morphsuit Mayhem promotion 1.jpg are likely to be deleted soon, I'm afraid. I realize you forwarded the letter you received to OTRS, but it is not usable. If the copyright owner does not supply a usable release, we cannot retain the images. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:09, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Is there anything specific, a template sentence, that they can include in a new email to say it's okay? -- Nick Moreau (talk) 00:06, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

I would recommend that you direct them to Commons:Email templates/Consent. It's a good general release statement, although they do have to choose the license they want to use. There's a little more information about allowable licenses in the email response you were sent by OTRS on 11/05, but CC By S.A. 3.0 (unported) is a good choice. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:59, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Puppet Bleeckie sliding.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Puppet Bleeckie sliding.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Secondarywaltz (talk) 01:49, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Puppet Bleeckie and Leslie Fleming.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Puppet Bleeckie and Leslie Fleming.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Secondarywaltz (talk) 01:49, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Puppet Bleeckie and Leslie Fleming c.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Puppet Bleeckie and Leslie Fleming c.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Secondarywaltz (talk) 01:49, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Puppet Bleeckie and Leslie Fleming b.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Puppet Bleeckie and Leslie Fleming b.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Secondarywaltz (talk) 01:49, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Puppet Bleeckie and an owl.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Puppet Bleeckie and an owl.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Secondarywaltz (talk) 01:49, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Slide scanner

I have Nikon Coolscan V, now outdated; this is a perfect machine. You may ask me. I am in Russia.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:42, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Checking out information for that, it looks good. Thanks! -- Nick Moreau (talk) 19:06, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Melissa Grelo CP24.jpg

Hello. The exchange of tweets is an unorthodox/novel/resourceful way of securing permission for a photo - I suspect it is fine, but just wanted you to know that I raised the issue at Commons talk:OTRS#File:Melissa Grelo CP24.jpg, more in terms of formalizing the tweets as an OTRS ticket. Cheers, --Skeezix1000 (talk) 21:09, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:38, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Michaeldsuarez (talk) 00:39, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Places toronto billboard iPod.jpg

File:Places toronto billboard iPod.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—Mono 18:25, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Dog-Gone Whatll those city fellers be thinkin up next.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Dog-Gone Whatll those city fellers be thinkin up next.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 12:36, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Stacey Farber AdamodePax LR-5.jpeg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Stacey Farber AdamodePax LR-5.jpeg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Stacey Farber AdamodePax LR-5.jpeg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Dman41689 (talk) 08:50, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive 01⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Duff 4.jpg

File:Duff 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lady Lotus (talk) 13:01, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Zanimum,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Time 100 Craig Newmark a.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Time 100 Craig Newmark a.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Time 100 Craig Newmark a.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

And also:

• File:Time 100 Craig Newmark b.jpg
• File:Time 100 Craig Newmark c.jpg
• File:Time 100 Craig Newmark d.jpg
• File:Time 100 Craig Newmark e.jpg
• File:Time 100 Craig Newmark f.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ralgis (talk) 21:12, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

File:CW White Water Canyon SpongeBob 3D.JPG

File:CW White Water Canyon SpongeBob 3D.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

1989 02:03, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

File:CW White Water Canyon Action Theatre.jpg

File:CW White Water Canyon Action Theatre.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

1989 17:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Spoken Wikipedia en Fred 80 sped.ogg

File:Spoken Wikipedia en Fred 80 sped.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

117Avenue (talk) 04:22, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Gregwilliamsappleandorangecartoon.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gregwilliamsappleandorangecartoon.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Gregwilliamsappleandorangecartoon.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Deleted content

---

Hello Zanimum/Archive 01, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Gregwilliamsappleandorangecartoon.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:

• use in any work, regardless of content
• creation of derivative works
• commercial use
• free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 00:34, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Ophelia Pastrana.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ophelia Pastrana.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Secondarywaltz (talk) 21:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

@Secondarywaltz: Apologies, I got distracted in replying to Pastrana. I have forwarded on my correspondence. -- Nick Moreau (talk) 21:36, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

I thought you'd be on top of this, but I tagged it anyway. I'll try to fix the tagging. Secondarywaltz (talk) 21:44, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Fan Expo Canada 2016 Con floor IMG 0094 03.jpg

File:Fan Expo Canada 2016 Con floor IMG 0094 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sw0 (talk) 03:21, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Anime North 2017 IMG 5110.jpg

File:Anime North 2017 IMG 5110.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sw0 (talk) 03:38, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Anime North 2017 Pokemon armour IMG 5068.jpg

File:Anime North 2017 Pokemon armour IMG 5068.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sw0 (talk) 03:38, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Anime North 2017 Pokemon armour IMG 5069.jpg

File:Anime North 2017 Pokemon armour IMG 5069.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sw0 (talk) 03:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Anime North 2017 Pokemon IMG 4985.jpg

File:Anime North 2017 Pokemon IMG 4985.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sw0 (talk) 03:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Anime North 2017 Pokemon Mimiku IMG 5036.jpg

File:Anime North 2017 Pokemon Mimiku IMG 5036.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sw0 (talk) 03:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Anime North 2017 Pokemon Squirtle Pikachu IMG 5024.jpg

File:Anime North 2017 Pokemon Squirtle Pikachu IMG 5024.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sw0 (talk) 03:40, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikisource Urdu logo

Can you develop Urdu Wikisource logo?------Bukhari ^Talk 18:03, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

@BukhariSaeed: Sure, I'd love to!

Can you suggest an appropriate Urdu font? I'm looking at the many styles of text for the Urdu Wikipedia. -- Nick Moreau (talk) 18:45, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you so much :) just replace "Wikisource" with "ویکی ماخذ" in eng logo

Wikisource = ویکی ماخذ --Bukhari ^Talk 19:03, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:LEGO Indiana Jones at Desert edge.jpg

Yours sincerely, — Racconish^☎ 14:56, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Deleted content

---

Hello Zanimum/Archive 01, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:LEGO Indiana Jones at Desert edge.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:

• use in any work, regardless of content
• creation of derivative works
• commercial use
• free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:34, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Sarah McBride 2018 publicity photo.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sarah McBride 2018 publicity photo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sarah McBride 2018 publicity photo.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

@Patrick Rogel: The permission info has been submitted as 2018020710001298, but no reply yet. -- Nick Moreau (talk) 02:27, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Fan Expo Canada 2016 Epic Mickey IMG 0133.jpg

And also:

• File:FXC17 Oswald and Mickey cosplay.jpg

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 22:23, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

File:FanExpo Canada promotion IMG 6168.jpg

File:FanExpo Canada promotion IMG 6168.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: copyrighted figures Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:42, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Elliot Lake Algo Centre Mall Getting the chains ready to pull up some debris.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Elliot Lake Algo Centre Mall Getting the chains ready to pull up some debris.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Elliot Lake Algo Centre Mall Getting the chains ready to pull up some debris.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

And also:

• File:Elliot Lake Algo Centre Mall Getting ready to cut the beam and lift it out.jpg
• File:Elliot Lake Algo Centre Mall Mike Mantha giving his speech to screams and cheers as he says crews are going back in.jpg
• File:Elliot Lake Algo Centre Mall Up and away the large beam goes.jpg
• File:Elliot Lake Algo Centre Mall Police talking and guarding the barricade.jpg
• File:Elliot Lake Algo Centre Mall Crowd gathering as Mike Mantha runs onto the lot at 9-15pm.jpg
• File:Elliot Lake Algo Centre Mall Candle lit walkway.jpg
• File:Elliot Lake Algo Centre Mall Sending men into the building.jpg
• File:Elliot Lake Algo Centre Mall Part of the growing crowd outside the mall-town hall after announcements were made that rescue efforts were being halted.jpg
• File:Elliot Lake Algo Centre Mall roof.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 17:38, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Creator:Nicholas Moreau

Creator:Nicholas Moreau has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this creator, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 05:37, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Disneyland Mickey and Minnie kiss as cowboys.jpg

File:Disneyland Mickey and Minnie kiss as cowboys.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: © The Walt Disney Company. This picture mainly focused on Disney-copyrighted animation chracters, and the relevant content is not used de minimis. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

WQL (talk) 05:18, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Fan Expo Canada floor IMG 6047.jpg

And also:

• File:Fan Expo Canada floor IMG 6051.jpg
• File:Fan Expo Canada floor IMG 6398.jpg
• File:FanExpo Canada crowd IMG 6145.jpg

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:16, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:FXC17 501st Jabba.jpg

And also:

• File:FXC17 HasbroStore dolls.jpg
• File:FXC17 HasbroStore exclusive.jpg
• File:FXC17 Nintendo booth.jpg
• File:FXC17 Sheridan College display.jpg
• File:FXC17 Sheridan College fish.jpg

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:19, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Fan Expo 2019 promotion.jpg

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:03, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Anime North 2019 D IMG 0456.jpg

And also:

• File:Anime North 2019 D IMG 0457.jpg

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:06, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Anime North 2018 IMG 7356.jpg

File:Anime North 2018 IMG 7356.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:10, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Anime North 2018 IMG 7260.jpg

File:Anime North 2018 IMG 7260.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:46, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Fan Expo Canada 2016 EBGames going for prizes IMG 0228 05.jpg

File:Fan Expo Canada 2016 EBGames going for prizes IMG 0228 05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:39, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Fan Expo Canada floor IMG 6031.jpg

File:Fan Expo Canada floor IMG 6031.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Anime North 2018 IMG 7263.jpg

File:Anime North 2018 IMG 7263.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:52, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Armenian lérmédjoun cooking (008).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting perspective and good quality -- Spurzem 21:11, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi :)

Thank you for proposal. An additional motivation to write the wikibooks for this recipe.

----Benoît (d) 05:51, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Wow, that is a fantastic idea, Benoît Prieur! I love this series of photos. -- Nick Moreau (talk) 03:35, 3 May 2020 (UTC)