Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Крем супа од тиквички 1.jpg
File:Крем супа од тиквички 1.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2019 at 14:37:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Food
- Info created by MadMona - uploaded by MadMona - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:37, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:37, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- Weak support Interesting. Food photography is a genre we're lacking in, I think, so this is a nice find. I'm not convinced the quality is brilliant, but it's a good composition and attractively shot, so I think there's enough to support. Cmao20 (talk) 16:14, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose - This should be nominated to QIC, as I think it deserves the QI designation, but I find the sharpness a bit disappointing and I'm in no way overwhelmed by the picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:07, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support Per Cmao. --BoothSift 23:54, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ikan.--Ermell (talk) 08:26, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support Love the composition and coloring, and I think the details are sufficient. ― Gerifalte Del Sabana 01:27, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:54, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- 🇪🅰〒ℂ🇭🅰- 💬 20:19, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- weak support The longer I look at it, the more I like it. I love the simple yet effective arrangement and the soft, natural lighting (looks like indirect sunlight from a window). It has a nice fall-off in sharpness towards the edges, while the subject itself is reasonably sharp. The editing is minimal, with a very natural look. It looks almost under-processed, and I think I would be tempted to give it a tiny little bit more "punch" in terms of saturation, brighten it up a bit and maybe shift the WB half a notch towards the warmer end. But that's all about style and taste and I certainly wouldn't dare to suggest that that would be any better than the current version. --El Grafo (talk) 09:38, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ikan. Just avergade quality -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:15, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice composition but for such a still shot I expect better quality. --Cart (talk) 07:41, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:15, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Cart --Llez (talk) 02:22, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:14, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 07:54, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Cart. —kallerna (talk) 05:33, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:41, 24 April 2019 (UTC)