Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:13-11-02-olb-by-RalfR-03.jpg

File:13-11-02-olb-by-RalfR-03.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2013 at 10:05:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by -- Ralf Roleček 10:05, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ralf Roleček 10:05, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Overprocessed, strong lack of fine detail, whilst nice composition. --Ivar (talk) 10:33, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Please avoid using such unofficial templates, it is confusing for the bot (when it runs...). And so: do you mean you oppose ?--Jebulon (talk) 17:43, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree that the denoising could be reduced a bit and I'd suggest a crop on the right to increase symmetry, but anyhow, WOW for the subject, lighting and originality! Poc o² 19:08, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:20, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment whites are burned and overexposed.--Jebulon (talk) 23:01, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Wonderful composition. But there are quality problems that prevent me from supporting, such as the aforementioned burnt highlights as well as the excessive NR, which makes the textures look like brush strokes. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:09, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tuxyso (talk) 07:40, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Excessive NR and unfortunate crop at the bottom which creates an unbalanced composition. (Why there's no Exif data?) --Selbymay (talk) 10:53, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very nice but overprocessed --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:42, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support For the last version --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:04, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question - ok, i will upload tomorrow a new version, cancel this nomination or no? --Ralf Roleček 20:15, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, new Version uploaded. --Ralf Roleček 21:22, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition -- Colin (talk) 22:46, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 22:15, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the central part of the eye that immediately goes to look at is blurred and grainy, this photo is beautiful only if we take small, it can not be used for printing and is not suitable for "featured picture" --Pava (talk) 22:26, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Pava, please, refrain from participating in FPC if you have no clue about photography, and, by the way, take back your two nominations in the top, they are pitiful. Thanks for your understanding. 93.135.184.108 21:42, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh what a courageous anonymous comment...--Jebulon (talk) 20:24, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:09, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 04:01, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /J Kadavoor J e e 17:05, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors