Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:150502 Strelitzer Straße bei Nacht.jpg

File:150502 Strelitzer Straße bei Nacht.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 May 2015 at 05:22:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info Night view of Berlin Strelitzer Straße towards the TV Tower which is pointing to the moon. All by me. -- Code (talk) 05:22, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Code (talk) 05:22, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support well done! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:34, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico talk 16:51, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:49, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:38, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Abiii132 17:25, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good and nice, but the subject is not FP worthy for my taste. A street by night, even with the moon and the tower is not enough for me. The empty foreground is a bit too prominent, the cropped car is a bit disturbing. I'm sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 21:12, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment probably posterization see notes. --Laitche (talk) 22:40, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. Thank you for your comment but sorry, even after having more than one look at your notes I couldn't see anything that looked like posterization to me. I didn't much postprocessing (only adjusting the white balance, reducing lights and adding some sharpness) so I don't know how it should come to posterization here. --Code (talk) 21:32, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it looks posterization but not posterization so I deleted the notes. --Laitche (talk) 22:56, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ralf Roleček 22:18, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 12:10, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose There is a (double) lens flare below the moon (slightly to the left), can you please fix that?. Quality is overall good but I am a bit disappointed that the moon is not aligned with the tower, that would have been a special touch in the composition Poc o² 18:55, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Poco a poco: Thanks for the review. I'm not sure whether the lens flares are a bug or a feature. However - unfortunately I don't know how to remove them. I tried some cloning in Photoshop but the result was bad. Decreasing the green saturation in this area didn't work either. Do you have an idea how to get rid of them? And: Would it change your mind? --Code (talk) 15:57, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't consider something like that a feature, and yes, I know that it is tricky to remove. The technique I would use is cloning the bottom right quarter of the moon and flipping it for the left side. I'd probably move to neutral if that is fixed. Poc o² 16:37, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Lovely illuminations everywhere and that moon simply is the top on the cake. -- Pofka (talk) 18:57, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:36, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes