Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:16-01-11-Wien-Schwarzweißfilm-01.jpg

File:16-01-11-Wien-Schwarzweißfilm-01.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2016 at 13:23:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info sorry for Google translation, my english is too bad. The image is original without electronic editing and trimming the negative. The converging lines are intentional, the subject is no other way. Upper limit is very nearly the top of the gate, on the right edge of the target. The publication "STOP", the bollard and the person form a diagonal line, I have waited for this moment. Without the person would only be a white hole the target. The atrium is typical of the dynamic range in black and white, but nowhere 100% white. The clear film grain based on 4800 dpi at Negaticscan. All by --Ralf Roleček 13:23, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ralf Roleček 13:23, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support a nice and true bw image. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:23, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Alchemist-hp: What????? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:31, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a "true" black-white image! Not a "recalculated" from a DSRL camera! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:06, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Hmm... a nice little "Der dritte Mann" nostalgia over this, not sure it's FP though. But huge kudos for having the guts to nominate something different! w.carter-Talk 15:28, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I don't find the picture clear enough. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan. INeverCry 20:07, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I see what you were trying to do. Daniel Case (talk) 05:32, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support For me is fine --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 15:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I see what you were trying to do, but it is not there yet. The idea is good, but the composition isn't. Yann (talk) 12:14, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /INeverCry 03:00, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]