Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aarhus City Tower set fra Europa Plads.jpg

File:Aarhus City Tower set fra Europa Plads.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2016 at 06:32:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Infoall by Villy Fink Isaksen -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 06:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 06:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A good quality image of the building, but the light is harsh and glaring, especially the sky and clouds. Even if the light was perfect, I don't see what's special about this. INeverCry 06:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ - I found this photo very restful to look at. I think the composition suits the building, and these kinds of buildings can merit a feature, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:59, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I have to admit the others' arguments have shown me drawbacks I didn't initially see in this picture. I still like it, but regret that I will now be Neutral on featuring it. Very sorry. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per INeverCry. Sorry. --Code (talk) 07:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Good pic on the building itself but unfortunate angle, busy foreground (the rusty truss is awful), and the blown cloud spoils it entirely. Needs another vantage point. Too much room on top, making the building look small. Altogether not an excellent photograph IMHO. --Kreuz schnabel 08:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Ikan that building such as this could also be featured, but this is not the best possible shot of this block. w.carter-Talk 10:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 12:48, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /INeverCry 20:22, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]