Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Altstätten, Appenzeller Bahn.jpg

File:Altstätten, Appenzeller Bahn.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2012 at 21:31:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info die Appenzeller Bahn auf der Strecke Altstätten-Gais
Info c/u/n by -- Böhringer (talk) 21:31, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Böhringer (talk) 21:31, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like the composition, but the situation displayed is highly unrealistic. Kleuske (talk) 21:38, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:32, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Like the old man in the garden near the fence. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 05:10, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Probably Kleuske has right, but anyway a good picture.. --Llorenzi (talk) 07:43, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic panorama. Realistic as long as one understands that it depictures the same train in two different postions. The unrealistic thought that there are two trains and one tractor, those all are going to collide in a single spot is quite amusing IMHO. -- Achird (talk) 12:40, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment oversharpened and strong noisy area (see annotation) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:45, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

lieber Carschten, du schreibst schon zum zweiten mal daß Bilder von mir überschärft sind. Nochmal: Ich schärfe nie ein Bild nach. Das Bild entstand auf einem Stativ! Vielleicht deshalb? --Böhringer (talk) 18:33, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

mit welchem Programm stitcht du denn deine Panoramas? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 19:33, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PTGui --Böhringer (talk) 22:10, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Guck mal die Fahrleitung im Massstab 1:1 an, die hat ein ca. 2px breites Halo; das ist ein typisches Nachschärfe-Artefakt. Andere Stellen im Bild zeigen dasselbe (z.B. das Hausdach). Ich vermute jetzt einfach mal, dass du JPEGs machst und deine Kamera die Bilder schärft. Schau mal die Fahrleitung auf den Bildern ab Kamera an. Evtl. fällt das erst nach dem Stitchen richtig stark auf, weil dann gewisse Bildbereiche vergrössert werden. --Kabelleger (talk) 22:12, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ivar (talk) 19:18, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- despite some reservations. Kleuske (talk) 20:57, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I really like the idea, but the image quality could be better (noisy parts, halo and minor stitching errors around the catenary wire) and the situation is not ideal (dominant catenary mast near the center of the picture, lots of shadows on the train). --Kabelleger (talk) 22:29, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Over-processed with bright glow around the wires; noisy sky. Sting (talk) 00:00, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Sting. --Julian H. (talk/files) 08:44, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Sting and Kabelleger Banangraut (talk) 20:24, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Sting --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 16:45, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 10:05, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:48, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas