Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Birds and sea.jpg
File:Birds and sea.jpg, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2019 at 20:04:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment A beautiful photo, but since you now have several QIs and FPs, it's about time you started to learn how to categorize your photos correctly. You are using the "tagging" system, which (sadly) is not what is used on Commons. Other friendly users have helped you so far, but as you are becoming a regular here, you need to be able to do this yourself. Please take a look at Commons:Categories. --Cart (talk) 21:07, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- @W.carter: you're right. thanks for your suggestions and your kind.--Amirpashaei (talk) 10:51, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Amirpashaei: No problem. If the page about Categories is hard to understand, you can take a look at a post from my talk page where I was teaching another user how to categorize correctly. See: User talk:W.carter/Archive 13#Coaching.... --Cart (talk) 11:04, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
- @W.carter: thanks. i read it. that was very helpful.--Amirpashaei (talk) 11:46, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Will support once this is fixed. Seven Pandas (talk) 22:06, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Weak oppose Certainly dramatic and a worthwile contribution to Commons, but it doesn't seem quite sharp to me. Cmao20 (talk) 15:47, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Per Cmao. There are also CAs at many of the birds --Llez (talk) 06:06, 17 November 2019 (UTC)- Oppose per Cmao20 and Llez. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:48, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Cmao20 and Llez. --Cart (talk) 15:48, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. Nice idea with some wow but the drawbacks are too severe: Posterization in the sky, CAs on birds, contrast too harsh (white parts of plumage blown), insufficient sharpness, WB a bit on the reddish side IMHO. Exif data would be fine, geocoding is nearly a must for such a shot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kreuzschnabel (talk • contribs) Cart (talk) 19:30, 17 November 2019 (UTC) (UTC)
- moral support - it really is a great shot, but there are many technical problems mentioned above, and I don't think it's fixable at this stage. — Rhododendrites talk | 21:54, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Kreuzschnabel. --Fischer.H (talk) 15:06, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. No there there. Daniel Case (talk) 04:10, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
