Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Fischer.H!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:49, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

KategorienEdit

Hallo Fischer.H, vielen Dank für das fleißige Bebildern der Denkmallisten. Bitte beachte doch in Zukunft, die Fotos mit Kategorien zu versehen, damit sie unabhängig von den Wikipedia-Denkmallisten auch hier bei Commons gefunden werden können. Baudenkmäler werden grundsätzlich mit Cultural heritage monuments in ... kategorisiert, also etwa Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Hambach an der Weinstraße. Die Kategorien können gleich beim Hochladen der Datei angegeben (beim UploadWizard mit einer eigenen Maske, die gleich anzeigt, ob eine Kategorie existiert oder nicht) oder im Nachhinein hinzugefügt/korrigiert werden (wie andere Benutzer und ich es jetzt schon für Deine bisherigen Werke getan haben; einfach mal in die Versionsgeschichten schauen). Oft hilft bei Unsicherheiten ein Blick auf bereits bebilderte Listen bzw. Kategorien, um zu sehen, wie andere es gemacht haben. Bei Fragen kannst Du Dich gern an mich wenden. Viele Grüße und weiterhin frohes Schaffen, -- Giorgio Michele (talk) 09:13, 28 July 2014 (UTC)


Nochmal KategorienEdit

Hallo Hallo Fischer, beachte bitte, dass hier deutschsprachige Kategorienamen wie Category:Kulturdenkmale in Hambach an der Weinstraße hier nicht zulässig sind. (Siehe Commons:Categories.) Die richtige Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Hambach an der Weinstraße ist Dir doch oben schon vorgeschlagen worden. Nehme die dann auch bitte! -- Ies (talk) 17:08, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Klassizistische_Torpfeiler.jpgEdit

Zum einen ist die Arbeitssprache hier in Commons Englisch - es gibt sicher auch eine Menge Benutzer, die Deutsch verstehen, aber du erhöhst die Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass ein Anliegen bearbeitet wird, ungemein, wenn du es auf Englisch formulierst.

Zum zweiten verstehe ich aber auch auf Deutsch die Löschbegründung nicht (es wäre nett, wenn du diese in einem ganzen Satz formulieren könntest!). Wenn du meinen solltest, dass in der Denkmalliste immer nur ein Bild verwendet werden sollte und du jetzt zwei Bilder von den Torpfeilern hochgeladen hast: Es gibt ja nun durchaus noch weitere Anwendungsfälle für Bilder als die Denkmalliste, und ein Gutteil der Commons-Bilder wird gar nicht in Wikipedia-Artikeln verwendet. Insofern ist das eigentlich kein Löschgrund. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 20:29, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

VandalismusEdit

Hallo Fischer.H, obwohl es Dir wiederholt erklärt wurde und Du genau weißt, das das falsch ist, gibst Du Deinen Bildern weiterhin deutschsprachige Kategorien, wie z.B.

Was soll das? Warum machst Du Dinge wider besseren Wissens immer wieder falsch? Was willst Du damit erreichen? Willst Du unbedingt wegen Vandalismus gesperrt weden? Anders als Vandalismus kann man Dein Verhalten ja kaum noch deuten. -- Ies (talk) 18:02, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Vandalismus?Edit

Hallo Fischer.H, was bitte sollte dieser Revert? Ich habe das unkategorisierte Bild mit einer Kategorie versehen, damit es hier bei Commons einsortiert ist und gefunden wird. Ich hoffe, dass es sich hierbei nur um ein Versehen handelte. Am besten für alle Beteiligten wäre es natürlich, wenn du selbst die korrekten Kategorien eintragen könntest. Bei Fragen kannst du dich gern an mich wenden. -- Giorgio Michele (talk) 15:32, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Giorgio Michele, die ganze Angelegenheit beruht auf ein Versehen meinerseits, ich bitte um Entschuldigung, und werde mir Mühe geben, in Zukunft die korrekten Kategorien einzutragen.12:51, 4 January 2016 (UTC) Fischer.H (talk)
Danke schön. Viele Grüße, -- Giorgio Michele (talk) 16:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Abano-078.jpgEdit

 
File:Abano-078.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

De728631 (talk) 15:47, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Geiskopferhof-Rekonstruktion.jpgEdit

 
File:Geiskopferhof-Rekonstruktion.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sitacuisses (talk) 16:57, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Geiskopferhof Flächen.jpgEdit

 
File:Geiskopferhof Flächen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sitacuisses (talk) 16:58, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyEdit

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchturm Alt-Graun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Sumitsurai 11:35, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zitronenfalter-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good detail on insect --Daniel Case 06:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Südpfalz-045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Maby you could change the title as well. The image could have been taken anywhere and has nothing typically from Südpfalz --Ermell 22:01, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garten-5730.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia surveyEdit

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9541 Mäusebussard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality for me. --Manfred Kuzel 04:13, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Vorsicht!Edit

H., sei bitte vorsichtig bei deinen Kategorisierungsversuchen. Category:Natural monuments in Rhineland-Palatinate hat jetzt gar keine übergeordnete Kategorie mehr, Category:Theodor-Heuss-Straße (Lachen-Speyerdorf) auch nicht. Und wenn du eine Kategorie mit HotCat hinzufügst, dann siehst du doch vorm Speichern schon, ob sie existiert, da sind solche Versuche doch nicht nötig. Gruß, --Achim (talk) 15:10, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

MäusebussardEdit

Hallo Fischer.H Was wolltest du denn genau hier nominieren? Die File:Mäusebussard 017.jpg scheint es nicht zu geben, die Nominierung also ungültig, aber wenn du mir sagst was du nominieren möchtest, kann ich vielleicht weiterhelfen. --A.Savin 18:23, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Hallo A. Savin, herzlichen Dank für deinen Beitrag zum nominieren einer Bilddatei. Habe leider übersehen, daß die erforderliche Datei noch nicht in Commons hochgeladen ist. Werde das umgehend nachholen. Viele Grüße--Fischer.H (talk) 12:56, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grünfinken 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --XRay 18:08, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garten 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwetzingen 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garten 056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
GQ --Palauenc05 18:49, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garten 079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very weak pro, but I´m not a birdy men. (Mir gefällt einfach die Aufteilung, in so einem kurzem Moment ist das fast Gestaltung. Sättigung könnte höher sein und das Farbrauschen könnte man auch leicht korrigieren.) Aber lassen wir mal gut sein....zumindest für Q1 --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 22:26, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roter Fingerhut IMG 5239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 21:42, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! P1210671.jpg-Logo Orchideenwelt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:32, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
There's something strange there, see note Poco a poco 19:53, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte Vecchio IMG 7979.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Gute Komposition (was viel zu schnell vergeben wird). Aber was war die Idee mit den Farben?? Sieht nach 70er Dia-Film aus. Das kann einem Nostalgiker gefallen, mir leider nicht. Bin mir nicht mal sicher ob es sich "retten" lässt, es geht nicht um die Schattenseite links, aber um die Laterne. Gibt´s da ein RAW davon? Biete mich mal, wenn es nicht eilt --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 06:15, 19 March 2018 (UTC)  Done --Fischer.H 14:44, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
That was a big step, around the street light there is still a slight halo and the darker areas are too bright, you should increase contrast or darken the shadows Poco a poco 18:50, 19 March 2018 (UTC)  Done Change was made --Fischer.H 15:42, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
The halos are still there, and patially coloured due to CA, that needs a fix. Sorry, I am not convinced yet. Poco a poco 18:53, 20 March 2018 (UTC)  DoneCa cleared away --Fischer.H 10:34, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Good enough for me --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 03:49, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kürbis-Pyramide P1210668.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:01, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eichhörnchen - Sciurus vulgaris IMG 1320.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
weak   Support Für mich der Hammerǃ Und nicht nur weil ich Eichhörnchen mag, es gibt nur leider Fehler im Hintergrund. Mir ist klar das dies bei bewegten Objekten (Tieren) etwas unfair ist. Aber mich interessieren dabei keine Braas-Dachfenster und auch die Stange rechts ist unschön, dann noch etwas Farbrauschen. Wäre das alles nicht ist das ein klares FP, nicht nur QI Was für einen Photoshopper zum freistellen, sonst ist das für mich Dein bisher bestes Bildǃ--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 19:34, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mauereidechse IMG 1537.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 18:59, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eiger-Nordwand IMG 9984.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Halavar 17:02, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Timmelsjoch - Hochalpenstraße IMG 7446.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Photo seems a bit over processed. But okay for me.--Famberhorst 17:03, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonnenblume IMG 0012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
A little bit too dark, but enough for QI in my opinion. BTW, nice image. Tournasol7 20:17, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedensglocke Concordia 2000 IMG 4239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Isiwal 09:08, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotmilan IMG 7373.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mauereidechse IMG 1520.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Vielleicht ein leichter Gelbstich, das wäre noch einmal zu überprüfen. Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:32, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
  Done --Fischer.H 06:53, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weißburgunder Traube P1120164.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
GQ --Palauenc05 17:59, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Löwenzahn IMG 6874.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. Granada Sat, 28 Apr 2018 19:52:52 GMT

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gescheine auf Weinrebe IMG 7292.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment There are some dust spots that need cleaning.--Peulle 10:00, 7 May 2018 (UTC)/>   Done Removed spots. Thank you for your reviews. --Fischer.H 07:29, 8 May 2018 (UTC)OK --Peulle 19:48, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edelkastanie IMG 3661.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 20:13, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Category:Herzogstraße_15_-_19Edit

Category discussion warning

Herzogstraße 15 - 19 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  polski  português  sicilianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  ไทย  日本語  עברית  +/−

F. Riedelio (talk) 07:13, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Category:Herzogstraße_15–19Edit

Category discussion warning

Herzogstraße 15–19 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  polski  português  sicilianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  ไทย  日本語  עברית  +/−

F. Riedelio (talk) 07:15, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Category:Herzogshof_(Gimmeldingen)Edit

Category discussion warning

Herzogshof (Gimmeldingen) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  polski  português  sicilianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  ไทย  日本語  עברית  +/−

F. Riedelio (talk) 07:20, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Category:Herzogstraße_15_-_19_(Gimmeldingen)Edit

Category discussion warning

Herzogstraße 15 - 19 (Gimmeldingen) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  polski  português  sicilianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  ไทย  日本語  עברית  +/−

F. Riedelio (talk) 07:25, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Europäischer Laubfrosch P1220839.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:27, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Küchenschelle IMG 7257.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 09:14, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klatschmohn IMG 7452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holzbrücke Essing P1230044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Looks flareless. --Trougnouf 13:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großblumiges Mädchenauge IMG 1742.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Beautiful flower, and enough of it is sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 21:35, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eselsdistel IMG 7757.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Question: Is the category right?--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:15, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
  Done --Fischer.H 17:51, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nachtkerze IMG 7734.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:33, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schmuckkörbchen P1230577.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 21:14, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weißstorch IMG 14856.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:16, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eselsdistel IMG 7836.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Sehr gut. -- Ikan Kekek 09:41, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Löwenzahn (Leontodon crispus) P1230540.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:53, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dahlien P1230675.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
My German is not so good, so I apologize for writing in English. Could you please decrease the noise? -- Ikan Kekek 19:53, 23 June 2018 (UTC)  Done --Fischer.H 07:50, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
  Support - I suppose the flower could be a bit sharper, but I do like it better without noise and think it's good enough for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 04:02, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turmfalken IMG 2154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice!--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:19, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Himbeere 7825.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:56, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eselsdistel IMG 7947.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:15, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Kakteen 7900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. But: You should improve the filename. --XRay 10:06, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Sonnenblume 8116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. Colourful! --Basotxerri 18:57, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Holiday Park 8084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. Some minor spots in the sky. --Basotxerri 16:26, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Holiday Park 8079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:40, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Sonnenblume 8147.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Peulle 00:10, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Sonnenblume 8178-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Shame about the cut off petal underneath. But good quality for me.--Famberhorst 06:09, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Kornblume 7482.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Some noise. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 17:07, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hibiscus P1230969.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:15, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Sonnenblume 8242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Beautiful! Well here and there a green halo.--Famberhorst 18:15, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Arnica 8587.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:45, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Hambacher Schloss 8284.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Rosen 8460.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:12, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Kühltürme 6170.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Peulle 19:27, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Damhirsch 1356.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Honigbiene 7069.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:58, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Rothirsch 7292.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:51, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Donau-Radtour 0615.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Please try some perspective correction, a small tilt to the right and a tighter crop would be nice. Greetings --Dirtsc 06:45, 31 July 2018 (UTC)  Done --Fischer.H 09:19, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
  Support Good for me now. --Dirtsc 10:16, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rathaus der Stadt Wanfried, Hessen, Deutschland IMG 5932-1 edit.jpgEdit

Moin Fischer.H, danke für deine Stimme auf Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rathaus der Stadt Wanfried, Hessen, Deutschland IMG 5932-1 edit.jpg. Zwischenzeitlich habe ich eine Version bereitgestellt, die die von Basotxerri genannten Mängel abstellt. Ich würde mich freuen, wenn du auch die alternative Version bewerten könntest. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 19:50, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonnenblumen 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:10, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eselsdistel P1240190.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:12, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weinrebe IMG 2599.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --TheRunnerUp 19:01, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gewürztraminer P1120136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Peulle 17:55, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonnenblume IMG 2656.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:51, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silvaner P1240428.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. May be you can add a category for the location. --XRay 06:34, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dornfelder P1240238.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Crisp ... looks ready for harvesting --Daniel Case 17:52, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Birstaler Muskat P1240336.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 20:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muskat Bleu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 20:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Timmelsjoch IMG 7459.jpgEdit

Hallo Herr Fischer,

schönes Bild, das leider einige Fehler hat, die aber leicht zu beseitigen wären. (zB Sensorspots oben rechts). Was ich anbieten würde, wäre das Bild zu bearbeiten, so bald ich ein raw oder noch besser DNG (ist ein freier converter von adobe) habe. Auf meiner Seite steht meine email-adresse. Ich würde dann das psd schicken, wenn es nicht zu groß ist oder hier hochladen. Damit dürften Sie in Zukunft die Arbeiten in Photoshop selber durchführen können.

Schönes WE, --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 08:00, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasserfrosch IMG 9286.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:45, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleiner Fuchs IMG 0595.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Much noise in the background. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:57, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eigernordwand - Spinne IMG 5957.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 06:50, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borretsch IMG 5069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:04, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turmfalke P1200751.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 23:20, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blattläuse IMG 4255.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:39, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kernbeiser IMG 6235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Imo OK for QI, a bit noisy, but I´m aware of the problems... --Isiwal 21:30, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eichhörnchen IMG 1327.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice!--Famberhorst 19:09, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfälzerwald Holzernte IMG 0368.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:27, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Timmelsjoch IMG 7468.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Seems a bit unbalanced. But that may have been the case. Good enough for me.--Famberhorst 17:56, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolata 415.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:39, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hohe Loog IMG 4685.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Beautiful photo --Michielverbeek 18:15, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 18:18, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kropsbachweiher IMG 7606.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Strong CAs on the left side (see the note). --Halavar 18:58, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
  Done Thanks for the review.--Fischer.H 16:24, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 12:45, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Hanooz 04:15, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Spangenberg IMG 1212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
All contours show a light rim - maybe the result of a heavy CA-correction? --PtrQs 18:45, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
  Done Thanks for the review.--Fischer.H 16:40, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for this effort, but apart from some raised mid tones I can still see the bright rim between walls and clouds. Didn't you try to reduce the CA-correction? I've marked an example in the picture. --PtrQs 01:48, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
  Done File was processed again.--Fischer.H 10:57, 8 February 2019 (UTC)   Comment The "rims" observed by PtrQs are sharpening halos from too strong unsharp mask algorithm parameters. They have nothing to do with CA correction. --Johannes Robalotoff 13:35, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
@Johannes Robalotoff: Thank you for this hint - now I can better insult people for using such kinky techniques ;-) The effort was not much, but acceptable now. --PtrQs 01:20, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frühlingsboten P1240659.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Looks like alder catkins. --Seven Pandas 17:38, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roter Gutedel P1120129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --SimonWaldherr 08:53, 20 February 2019 (UTC)--Horst J. Meuter 11:48, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weißstorch P1190403.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weißstorch P1170558.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. and nice.--Famberhorst 18:29, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rothirsch IMG 1390.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:32, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wegekreuz IMG 9889.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Quality is good but it needs more specific categories --Poco a poco 10:29, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. The categroy issue seems to have been fixed. --Kritzolina 12:42, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weinrebe IMG 9989.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eidechse IMG 2990.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:13, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Junge Weinrebe IMG 0013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 04:40, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Löffler-Denkmal IMG 9939.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Quality is good but it needs a more specific category --Poco a poco 19:21, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  Done--Fischer.H 08:33, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 20:41, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Böhm IMG 0377.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Please check the verticals --Ermell 15:42, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
  Done--Fischer.H 16:21, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
The horizontal lines should also be aligned. --Ermell 07:59, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
  Done even the horizontal lines are aligned.--Fischer.H 16:47, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:57, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hunds-Rose P1250095.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:41, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klatschmohnbüte IMG 0643.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:58, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clematis IMG 0836.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Ok given the size --Poco a poco 21:30, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hausrotschwanz IMG 1907.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:02, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spatzen P1240484.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:39, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klatschmohn P1250324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Looks oversaturated --Poco a poco 17:34, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
  Done Image file edited again. --Fischer.H 07:20, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:01, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acker-Winde IMG 1223.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:07, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hubschrauber IMG 3201.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasserturm Duttweiler IMG 1290.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 09:42, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwalbenschwanz - Schmetterling IMG 2261.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Astern IMG 3343.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Peulle 17:04, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
  Comment - Depending on how big this flower is, this might be a Featured Picture candidate. How big is the diameter of the flower? -- Ikan Kekek 07:58, 15 June 2019 (UTC)  Info Diameter about 40 - 50 mm.--Fischer.H 07:23, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. Can be a FPC too. --大诺史 14:53, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
  Comment - I agree, though I would suggest adding the diameter to the file description. Also, except in Consensual Review, there's no need for more than one person to promote a file in QIC. -- Ikan Kekek 03:49, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rebenblüte IMG 3750.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Musicaline 05:04, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malve P1250340.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support - Given that these flowers are very small per w:Malva sylvestris, this is sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 08:03, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. Can be a FPC too. --大诺史 14:53, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
  Comment - I'm not at all sure about that. -- Ikan Kekek 19:53, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rapsblüte P1170138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support A little bit noisy, but acceptable. --XRay 07:59, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Primeln IMG 9909.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 08:57, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rotmilan IMG 7373.jpgEdit

Hi, Please fix your nomination before inserting it. Thanks, Yann (talk) 18:03, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Süßkirschen IMG 1404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:34, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Rotmilan IMG 7373.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rotmilan IMG 7373.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phacelia IMG 1430.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:07, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kornblume IMG 3549.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:49, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klatschmohn IMG 0911.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality IMO --PJDespa 20:03, 01 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wilde Karde IMG 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 17:14, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wilde Karde IMG 2069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Sharp and a nice background. --Bernard Ladenthin 08:14, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zinnien IMG 2195.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klatschmohn IMG 2533.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 15:30, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acker-Winde IMG 2708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:00, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naternkopf IMG 2653.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --PantheraLeo1359531 11:38, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleine Klette IMG 2731.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support A bit noisy, but overall good quality. --Aristeas 11:53, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weizen IMG 2713.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. But please improve the categorization. One category is overcategorized too. --XRay 09:48, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Korn Rade IMG 2491.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:41, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Färber-Distel IMG 2487.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:41, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Königskerze P1250816.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Echinopsis IMG 2981.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support A bit too dark, but good enough for QI in my opinion. --Tournasol7 08:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kakteen IMG 4213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 18:00, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kakteen IMG 4213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 18:00, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Straucheibisch IMG 2560.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ercé 16:43, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonnenblume IMG 3119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:01, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Kakteen IMG 4213.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kakteen IMG 4213.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlafmohn IMG 2141.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Gute Qualität, Subjekt fokussiert, keine Irritationen. --PantheraLeo1359531 20:23, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Riesenschnake Quality image candidateEdit

Very nice photo but this is Nephrotoma scurra a species in the family Tipulidae.Will you change the German language description. Best regards Notafly (talk) 20:42, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bachstelzen-Nest IMG 1067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 15:57, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bachstelze IMG 3840.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 18:54, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergfink IMG 6169.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. Slightly too dark IMO. --Ermell 08:41, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bachstelze IMG 3840.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsel IMG 9515.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good focus to the bird --Michielverbeek 06:47, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlehdorn P1250894.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. (A bit soft, but IMHO OK given that the fruits are rather small.) --Aristeas 09:30, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Garten-5730.jpgEdit

Thanks for trying to get the category right, but you can see it still needed fixed. The anchor has to match exactly the text of the sub-heading. Please can you test your link does actually work, rather than continuing to expect others to fix every one of your nominations. -- Colin (talk) 10:41, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passionsblume IMG 3432.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --MB-one 15:33, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herbstblumen P1260256.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Gute Qualität, Subjekt fokussiert. --PantheraLeo1359531 10:16, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schmuckkörbchen IMG 3106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --D-Kuru 17:05, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weintraube P1260279.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

You need to fix that category, what grape is it? --Poco a poco 09:11, 22 September 2019 (UTC)  Done--Fischer.H 16:03, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:18, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Regent P1260239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:52, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passionsblumen IMG 3442.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

needs proper categorization --MB-one 19:10, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. Cat fixed. --Stepro 01:06, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Passionsblume IMG 3432.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Passionsblume IMG 3432.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchturm Hambach IMG 3251.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:34, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rebenblatt IMG 3807.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:47, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Äpfel P1260372.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Please, add more specific categories --Poco a poco 19:41, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
  Done--Fischer.H 13:46, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
  Support Thanks --Poco a poco 08:09, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herbstlaub im WeinbergIMG 3616.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice autumn leaves --Michielverbeek 18:15, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 23:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grindelwald 064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 12:37, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grindelwald IMG 9984.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Carschten 20:17, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garten IMG 2221.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

I would say this is too dark. If you have the RAW file, could you try boosting the exposure to see whether the image can be rescued? --Bobulous 17:58, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality, the exposure is fine for this kind of scene --Uoaei1 05:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mäusebussard IMG 4922.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

You should choose a more meanigful title. --Ermell 21:37, 14 November 2019 (UTC)  Done--Fischer.H 16:34, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  Support Thank you. --Ermell 21:28, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strohballen IMG 3088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. I can live with the blown whites because I really like the light. --Carschten 19:25, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  Comment - I'm not seeing anything blown. I do see at least one and maybe as many as four little dust spots a bit to the left of the upper right corner. Fischer.H, please look for them. I like this photo a lot, too. -- Ikan Kekek 08:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Hubschrauber IMG 3201.jpgEdit

 
File:Hubschrauber IMG 3201.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fischer.H (talk) 09:17, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Hubschrauber IMG 3201.jpgEdit

 
File:Hubschrauber IMG 3201.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fischer.H (talk) 09:17, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Hubschrauber IMG 3201.jpgEdit

 
File:Hubschrauber IMG 3201.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fischer.H (talk) 09:17, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulpen IMG 4313.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mauereidechsen IMG 4415.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Sonya7iv 09:15, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erste Frühlinsboten IMG 4059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Peulle 15:26, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kalifornischer Mohn IMG 4878.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Why iso 1000? --Moroder 09:50, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dirt Bike IMG 4202.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Noisy sky --MB-one 07:29, 4 June 2020 (UTC))
  Done --Fischer.H 16:51, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Better but still very noisy. --MB-one 19:07, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
  Done --Fischer.H 09:31, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:57, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klatschmohn IMG 6448.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Noise should be reduced. --Ermell 21:41, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
  Done --Fischer.H 15:01, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:51, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Donaudurchbruch P1230071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 18:05, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Löwenzahn IMG 5372. jpg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:22, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaktus IMG 5917.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 19:27, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edelkastanie IMG 5671.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 19:29, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Himbeeren IMG 7639.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:38, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großer Bocksbart IMG 5372.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:38, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Königskerze IMG 6063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Hwwo 16:58, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stachelbeere IMG 7121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality for me. --Hwwo 07:51, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beerenwanze IMG 7591.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good, but could categories be added for the location and maybe one for the plant the bug is on? --Blood Red Sandman 21:54, 23 June 2020 (UTC)  Done--Fischer.H 17:03, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. Thanks for the added categories. --Blood Red Sandman 11:48, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roggen IMG 8059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Mdaniels5757 01:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erdbeere IMG 8052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support QI imo. --ArildV 07:58, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bienen IMG 8273.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:42, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Honigbiene IMG 8242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:39, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kastanienblüte IMG 7169.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Dirt Bike IMG 4202.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dirt Bike IMG 4202.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hornisse IMG 2860.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Peulle 18:33, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dubbeglas IMG 6185.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! File St. Gallus IMG 6248.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloßstraße IMG 5354.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:22, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mäusebussard IMG 4269.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment On the one hand it's quite grainy and could use some noise reduction. However it's actually a nice shot with a good pose and quite some detail. support and oppose meets in the middle here. @Fischer.H: can you try to improve the colour noise a bit? --D-Kuru 20:58, 13 July 2020 (UTC) I think this is not a buzzard. It looks more like a falcon or hawk. Seven Pandas 22:44, 13 July 2020 (UTC)  Done Die Abbildung zeigt einen Mäusebussard und keinen Falken. --Fischer.H 15:04, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Even though it's still grainy, considering the object size, focal length shutter speed and ISO it is good enough for me to be QI --D-Kuru 20:57, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weizenernte IMG 6483.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 14:04, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Honigbiene IMG 6696.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wetterkreuz IMG 0029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 12:16, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weizenernte IMG 6529.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Needs more specific categories IMO. --Ermell 19:41, 24 July 2020 (UTC)  Done --Fischer.H 07:20, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:47, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Hausrotschwanz IMG 1907.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hausrotschwanz IMG 1907.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weyher in der Pfalz IMG 6666.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Weak   Support. I understand your composition, but the large unsharp tree in the foreground is a little bit disturbing. --XRay 10:22, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Bachstelze IMG 3840.jpgEdit

Hi there. I'd like to use this image in my magazine. Is that OK? Best wishes Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kugelgasbehälter IMG 6433.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality ReneeWrites 09:46, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raupe P1270551.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Category must be more precise. --Ermell 16:49, 24 August 2020 (UTC)   Done --Fischer.H 17:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality--Augustgeyler 20:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eiche P1270645.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 18:06, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gedenkstein in Essingen P1260741.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:52, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Speyerbachbrücke IMG 4298.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:18, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dornfelder IMG 6878.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:24, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wilde Karde IMG 6569.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 20:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
  Info Description not correct. Flowers are gone already. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:57, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Sorry for that. There are a few flowers left at the base of the inflorescence. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:07, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zinnie IMG 6777.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good image quality, colours and DoF --Tagooty 16:39, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  Support You forgot to promote. I agree that the center of the flower is good quality, and that's quite sufficient. -- Ikan Kekek 22:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siegerrebe IMG 6784.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --ReneeWrites 20:43, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rebschule IMG 6961.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

The disturbing branches at the right side should be cropped out. --Ermell 20:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC)   Done --Fischer.H 16:12, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:16, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maisernte IMG 6818.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Milseburg 17:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziegenbock P1270633.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support GQ --Palauenc05 16:48, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Huxelrebe IMG 6794.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 07:45, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonnenblume IMG 0315.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 16:43, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Supermarket in recife, pernambuco, Brazil.jpgEdit

Dear Fischer,

I have uploaded a new improved version in this nomination, please, take another look and tell me what you think. Thank you very much --Wilfredor (talk) 11:31, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mohn P1260987.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:47, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Speyerer Dom IMG 6844.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:26, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathaus Deidesheim IMG 7260.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 22:48, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deidesheimer Hof IMG 7256.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Halavar 19:14, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dreifaltigkeitskirche IMG 6834.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Very good! (I know it is not easy to get a photo of that church without many peope or even cars before it.) There are just two dustspots in the sky which I would suggest to remove. --Aristeas 09:01, 4 October 2020 (UTC)   Done --Fischer.H 09:20, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
  Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 08:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bussard IMG 9541.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Gute Qualität, schönes Foto --PantheraLeo1359531 20:29, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:IMG Kühltürme 6170.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:IMG Kühltürme 6170.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Edesheim P1200107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Nice, I just wonder if it isn’t leaning a bit to the left – maybe rotating it by 1° or so clockwise would fix that. --Aristeas 09:43, 14 October 2020 (UTC)   Done --Fischer.H 09:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  Comment Thank you, but maybe I have been very unclear – I meant rotating it in the other direction, sorry. --Aristeas 18:31, 15 October 2020 (UTC)   Done --Fischer.H 14:37, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 09:53, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Speyerer Dom IMG 6839.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Needs a perspective correction and a bit more of sky on the top --Poco a poco 17:47, 13 October 2020 (UTC)   Done --Fischer.H 09:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
More sky, that's good, but you have applied a pincushion perspective correction and it just needed a vertical perspective correction --Poco a poco 18:44, 14 October 2020 (UTC)   Done --Fischer.H 09:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  Support This is QI --Poco a poco 08:55, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 October 2020 (UTC)