Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bloeiaren in ontwikkeling van Diamantgras. 04-09-2022. (d.j.b) 01.jpg

File:Bloeiaren in ontwikkeling van Diamantgras. 04-09-2022. (d.j.b) 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2022 at 15:16:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Poaceae
Info Flowering spikes in development of Diamond Grass Calamagrostis brachytricha Focus stack of 16 photos. (Minimalist photography)
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:16, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:16, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellence in minimalism Cmao20 (talk) 00:22, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 05:53, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:19, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 07:06, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. In my opinion, some leading space towards the top right corner would improve the composition, though. As Alvesgaspar would say, "let the poor thing breathe!" --Julesvernex2 (talk) 09:26, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb minimalism. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:48, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support minimalistic indeed, including the space given in the upper right corner --Virtual-Pano (talk) 14:04, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love it! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I do not see here any reason for FP nomination, sorry. -- Karelj (talk) 21:54, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:49, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Technically well executed, but I struggle to see what makes this special. This is not minimalism by my understanding of the word. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:21, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:20, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles. —kallerna (talk) 12:58, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not all plants are photogenic. This is like shooting a blade of grass, in my view, and focus-stacking it. The technical work might be blameless, however the subject itself is rather unexceptional. Adding to this, the color of the background does not seem very natural to me: the paper is wavy at the top right. And the picture is mainly filled with empty space -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:49, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. I don't see any paper in the photo! and there isn't. According to (experts) these are colors that reinforce each other. So it has been thought about.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:41, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no paper behind?? So there were in your previous nominations and not on this one?? Note added showing the apparently corrugated paper with dark areas and light areas. If it's not paper, this is cardboard or plastic, or something artificial, right? -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:26, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: there is no paper, cardboard or plastic behind it. Then assumptions are yours.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:38, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So, what is it?

...Yes, these assumptions are mine but you should be honest, too. This is not a natural background. We know this kind of artificial settings coming from you. Same aspect 🔍 now .

And this background with that color in particular we've seen many times already -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:34, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: we use a kind of decor, which is placed in the open air. We can use different colors in that. Before (the simple blade of grass in your eyes) but special grass can be photographed, we are a long time further.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:34, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain Famberhorst why 'a kind of decor' is not 'something artificial', which you have denied. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:44, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 20:36, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile Poco a poco (talk) 15:50, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:08, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:26, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:00, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]