Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bruno Ganz 2011.jpg

File:Bruno Ganz 2011.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2016 at 04:33:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created by Loui der Colli - uploaded by Loui der Colli - nominated by Till.niermann -- Till (talk) 04:33, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Till (talk) 04:33, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better known as playing Hitler in Untergang. --Mile (talk) 10:53, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And for The American Friend, Circle of Deceit, Wings of Desire and so many other memorable films. Daniel Case (talk) 04:48, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support INeverCry 18:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I'm not so sure and may decide to oppose, because I find it distracting that his forehead is unsharp. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:34, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Works for me. Maybe technically not quite up to current standards, but it was taken in 2011 with a 10mpix camera, and it is still by far the most valuable picture here on Commons of this very relevant actor. --A.Savin 19:38, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Isn't "most valuable" for Valued Images? I think we need something more for FP, and 2011 is hardly old enough for us to consider this by the standards of historical pictures from the analog era. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:48, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

COM:VI is dead. Yes there are quality issues, but not so dramatic. IMO. The valuability is essential here --A.Savin 11:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dead? Huh? I don't understand. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:38, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

COM:VI is alive and working. --Mile (talk) 13:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:18, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. Sure it’s an impressing portrait yet it’s far from being perfect, considering the unsharp rendering of the forehead. 2011 is not the Stone Age of photography to excuse for this. --Kreuz schnabel 05:20, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've decided to Oppose. No wow for me. VI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:39, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Kreuzschnabel. Daniel Case (talk) 04:48, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great portrait! --Yann (talk) 20:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support after some consideration... great portrait! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:21, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per the others above -- Thennicke (talk) 15:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 08:17, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]