Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Burrow Mump, Foot of Hill.jpg
File:Burrow Mump, Foot of Hill.jpg edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2010 at 05:56:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Maedin - uploaded by Maedin - nominated by Patriot8790 -- патриот8790 (talk) 05:56, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Support -- патриот8790 (talk) 05:56, 20 March 2010 (UTC)- Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 12:00, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Oppose I don't like the composition and the quality --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:27, 20 March 2010 (UTC)- Oppose Composition. —kallerna™ 13:46, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose odd composition, uninteresting. --Dschwen (talk) 14:53, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Composition --Doucus (talk) 19:59, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, nothing special. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:16, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Urgh, why do I have to be embarrassed like this? Maedin\talk 09:30, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- This is not embarrassing at all. At least it shouldn't be. The image is definitely way better than the average on commons (just do a few clicks on "Random file" to reassure yourself ;-) ). --Dschwen (talk) 19:01, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- The fact that there are worse pictures out there is irrelevant. I upload for the encyclopaedias and because someone, somewhere, might find the CC licensed images useful; it's embarrassing when it turns into something for others to just giggle or grimace at and criticise, in this sort of public forum, where judgements are quickly and harshly passed from photograph to photographer. Maedin\talk 19:32, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hm, you are not easily cheered up, are you? --Dschwen (talk) 20:05, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Awww, I am, actually, :) I'm not usually so sour, just kinda sensitive about my photographs. I'm sorry for being so ungracious; I do appreciate your comment, :-) Maedin\talk 20:14, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hm, you are not easily cheered up, are you? --Dschwen (talk) 20:05, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- The fact that there are worse pictures out there is irrelevant. I upload for the encyclopaedias and because someone, somewhere, might find the CC licensed images useful; it's embarrassing when it turns into something for others to just giggle or grimace at and criticise, in this sort of public forum, where judgements are quickly and harshly passed from photograph to photographer. Maedin\talk 19:32, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- This is not embarrassing at all. At least it shouldn't be. The image is definitely way better than the average on commons (just do a few clicks on "Random file" to reassure yourself ;-) ). --Dschwen (talk) 19:01, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thank you, Patriot, but one of my worst, definitely not FP quality or FP composition or FP anything (that goes for all of mine). I wish I had seen this before 5 users felt compelled to oppose. Maedin\talk 09:33, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
