Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 12.JPG

File:Catedral de Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 12.JPG edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2014 at 08:52:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Blue-hour shot of the spectacular catholic Puebla Cathedral, build in 1649 and of Herrerian style, Puebla, Mexico. All by me, Poc o² 08:52, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 08:52, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support. But isn't this your third active nomination? I do think that perhaps the maximum of two should be raised to perhaps 3 or 4 though. Diliff (talk) 11:01, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No, it isn't. Just before starting this one I withdrew the other one of the Puebla Cathedral. Poc o² 11:13, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, sorry then. :-) Diliff (talk) 11:16, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico talk 11:31, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support but I think it would look better with a bit less of perspective correction. --Kadellar (talk) 11:35, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Kadellar: thanks for your comment. I tried it before the nomination but the result was not convincing, because the dome in the top far left was leaning in too much. Actually the wall and that dome are not aligned. This version is a kind of compromise. Poc o² 14:15, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the perspective correction looks to bad for me. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:10, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Alchemist-hp: I've uploaded a new version reworking the perspective, what do you think? Poc o² 18:11, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not really. I think it is better to take a pano from 2-4 images, correct the perspektive and crop it. Now it looks still unnatural for me. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:39, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I usually find this to be the case also. The control over perspective from software like Hugin or PTGui is more powerful than simple perspective transforms in Photoshop (and has the added benefit of greater resolution or less obvious distortion at the edges if you downsample). Diliff (talk) 20:05, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Alchemist-hp, especially at left.--Jebulon (talk) 19:35, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 08:15, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
weak Support – great motif, composition, detail and atmosphere making up for the perspective distortion IMHO --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 06:47, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, Colours, quality and motif are really nice, but the perspective correction is way overdone for my taste here. --mathias K 14:43, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Due to the wide angle of view this shots is difficult. But if I take a look on the photo I also get the impression that something is wrong at the left side, probably due to perspective correction. --Tuxyso (talk) 17:26, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose perspective problems, overexposed and disturbing lamps in foreground, nothing really featureable --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:29, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Poc o² 11:02, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]