Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling of Santa Maria in Vallicella (Rome).jpg

File:Ceiling of Santa Maria in Vallicella (Rome).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2016 at 10:09:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 10:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 10:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support jpp. Here we are! Happy New Year! --Hubertl 10:18, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support All the best for 2016! Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:17, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Happy new year! Regarding the image. Sorry, poor colours and wb, not very impressive sharpness, average composition. FP is not just a QI of a nice place, building or landscape. The photographer need to bring something more to the table. It might be very high technical quality and or EV, perfect timing, capturing a special moment or very beautiful light. And we do ask the photographer to bring something more when we review for example landscape and building exteriors. And we should do it even when we review church interiors.--ArildV (talk) 14:10, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Happy year! why do not you just vote instead of trying to teach what you already know and make suggestions of expensive objective pretending to economics? --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 15:50, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what you're talking about. I think it's a good idea to explain a oppose-vote (I allways do). And I have never proposed any expensive lenses. And composition, wb, exposure and colours has nothing to do with expensive lenses (it's about execution, and post-processing). --ArildV (talk) 16:03, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

if you have no idea you should read what you write! Say :"FP is not just a QI of a nice place" is for explain? or:"The photographer need to bring something more to the table" is for explain? Are you serious? Don't you write this? [1] 100 euro for a lens that normally the price (in Italy I don't know in your country) is 300! I did not say that the best lenses do better pictures (though honestly so of course) I just told you not to teach and don't give wrong prices, thanks--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 16:24, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I explain my vote and my thoughts on FP; I dont think you bring something more to the table here and therefore not FP. I found the lens for approximately 113 euros on ebay today, I paid approximately 80. And it was not a suggestion, it was a response to Hubertl's argument --ArildV (talk) 17:49, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I told you and you do not pretend (?) to understand and that's fine.In Italy we said "to wash your head to the mules you lose water and soap". And then what normal person goes to buy a lens in Japan (from Italy) ??? Anyway, is waste time to talk with you,also because i don't see your nomination here.Goodbay.--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:13, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:47, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not perfect, but I'll take it. Daniel Case (talk) 19:59, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support INeverCry 00:46, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 02:57, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose some weird processing, maybe be over sharpened in post process? Nothing is beautiful in full size here. -- RTA 02:30, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, I agree with opposers. This is not our best.--Jebulon (talk) 16:57, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:16, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors