Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cepaea nemoralis on moss 2.jpg

File:Cepaea nemoralis on moss 2.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2010 at 17:13:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded & nominated by Von.grzanka (talk) 17:13, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Von.grzanka (talk) 17:13, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor composition and quality. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:33, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb composition. --Lošmi (talk) 18:12, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good composition: photo is sharp and with good focus, and uses what would normally be distracting elements as an advantage. I encourage voters to look at it in full res. Steven Walling 19:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good composition. very good quality. I support now as FP, with pleasure.---Jebulon (talk) 22:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jafeluv (talk) 23:22, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Isn't it interesting - one says poor composition, others very good composition! I like snails. --Schnobby (talk) 07:24, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Not a good composition to me, with the head of the animal hardly visible and the unfocused stems in the foreground -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:11, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting photo, good composition, somehow funny. --Mile (talk) 08:54, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LadyofHats (talk) 11:22, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Alvesgaspar. Sorry. --Cayambe (talk) 12:30, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Framing, background, quality and foreground. —kallerna™ 19:00, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lighting isn't ideal and caused some overexposure on the shell. Good composition, but the animal is hidden from view. --ianaré (talk) 20:17, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ianare and others. --Avenue (talk) 02:56, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 10:55, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - MPF (talk) 10:47, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:57, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]