Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chrysaora fuscescens Ripley's Aquarium of Canada 3.JPG
File:Chrysaora fuscescens Ripley's Aquarium of Canada 3.JPG, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2014 at 12:05:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Gzzz
Neutral as creator -- Gzzz (talk) 12:05, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Question I am getting a different aspect ratio when I chose full size. Anyone else getting that? Saffron Blaze (talk) 20:04, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
- What do you get, a squarer picture ? Gzzz (talk) 20:52, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
- Landscape. Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:29, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
- see EXIF There's definitely something corrupted in this JPG between the image and the EXIF. -- Colin (talk) 12:43, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- What do you get, a squarer picture ? Gzzz (talk) 20:52, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Support - Two strange living creatures in a dreamlike composition. Plenty of wow. Pugilist (talk) 21:19, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Comment I'd like to have an idea of the scale. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:29, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
- Info I believe it is this on the left photo: [Chrysaorae], but if possible the "bell can be up to 30 inches wide, and tentacles can be as long as 16 feet on giant specimens". -- Lauro Sirgadocontribs 15:42, 3 November 2014 (UTC) opsss
- Info In this case, the bells where about 15 cm (6 inches) wide. --Gzzz (talk) 19:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support I get the landscape orientation at first, but then it flips back to portrait. Daniel Case (talk) 04:09, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 12:44, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Oppose -- nice but it doesn't have a wow factor. Dman41689 (talk) 06:49, 4 November 2014 (UTC)- Support Interesting, rare. --Mile (talk) 10:42, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Main objects should have been a little bit larger.--Yikrazuul (talk) 11:01, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
