Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Enduring Lightning Exercises, March 2020. III.jpg/2

File:Enduring Lightning Exercises, March 2020. III.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2020 at 01:53:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft
Info created by Lt. Col. E. - uploaded by Geagea - nominated by Geagea -- -- Geagea (talk) 01:53, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -- Geagea (talk) 01:53, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ - Better composition and light in this one, IMO. I'm not sure we need 2 FPs of Israeli Air Force planes over arid land, so I'm unsure about the other one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:40, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why such a low resolution? --Ivar (talk) 05:54, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very low resolution, and still unsharp. The composition isn't that good either, the fighters form maybe 5 % of the image area. The photos in our "Military jet aircraft" category are way better. —kallerna (talk) 08:07, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I have to agree with kallerna - it isn't that sharp, and it is small. Support removed, because after all, FPs are supposed to be the very best photos on Commons, and this one, while IMO beautiful, is not. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:39, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:24, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose in favour of the other one. Cmao20 (talk) 18:35, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 11:37, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose heavily downsampled. --Ivar (talk) 11:49, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too small, etc. --Yann (talk) 16:29, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just not as impressive to me as our other FPs of jet fighters. Daniel Case (talk) 01:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:05, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]