Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fresco of hall of Apollo in Villa d'Este (Tivoli).jpg

File:Fresco of hall of Apollo in Villa d'Este (Tivoli).jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2015 at 12:24:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info One of beautiful Frescos in Villa d'Este. The Villa d'Este is a villa in Tivoli, near Rome, Italy. Listed as a UNESCO world heritage site, it is a fine example of Renaissance architecture and the Italian Renaissance garden. All by -- LivioAndronico talk 12:24, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico talk 12:24, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:32, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 17:37, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:06, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is it unevenly lit?--Fotoriety (talk) 23:28, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Fotoriety,the light came only from a window on the left,thanks --LivioAndronico talk 07:13, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I am sorry, very nice shoot, however, pincushion distortion and right side is Underexposed, top right corner is cut. if it is fixed I will change my vote. its fixable, I think so --The Photographer (talk) 23:31, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Photographer can you tell me if is better ,the same ...worse? thanks --LivioAndronico talk 15:30, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, uneven lighting per Wilfredo. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:52, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done The Photographer and King I tried to improve the picture, I do not know if is better,thanks --LivioAndronico talk 07:13, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work with the light, because it was the more difficult for fix, now you only need fix pincushion distortion --The Photographer (talk) 10:01, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks The Photographer, unfortunately what you see is not a fresco on a flat surface but curve and because of this has some distortion, also in the 15 century they were not precisely accurate ...--LivioAndronico talk 11:40, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:02, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:37, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per The Photographer. Yann (talk) 20:01, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is there pincushion distortion (assuming that the surface is flat) or are we looking at a curved surface? Poc o² 19:55, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The question is already answered above, it "is not a fresco on a flat surface but curve and because of this has some distortion" --The Photographer (talk) 20:46, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is curved like this [1] Poco,thanks --LivioAndronico talk 20:44, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And why didn't you mention that not precisely unimportant information? The opposes -as far as I see- assume that there is pincushion distortion, but it is a normal effect due to the fact that the middle is further from the camera than the corners. So, maybe it is something that voters should be aware of. On the other side the uneven lighting and the cut corners are real problems for me, therefore

Neutral (but this border/frame is IMHO much better than in the FPC Jebulon opened) Poc o² 20:48, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Normally I don't write the kind of surface....next time I can write Poco,thanks... --LivioAndronico talk 20:53, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I maybe wouldn't have done it either. But latest when you get opposes due to a distortion problem of your lens that is none, then you should provide this information in your defense Poc o² 21:08, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But I wrote it, read up --LivioAndronico talk 21:25, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry, you are right, I oversaw it :S Poc o² 22:04, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would support if you can correct the crop at the upper right corner. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:57, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done In this way The Photographer,King of ♥ ♦ and Yann? Thanks --LivioAndronico talk 10:08, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 13:15, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Info Demoted to 'not featured' due to sock double vote. 4 October 2018.

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:28, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]