Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:George Floyd protest in Grand Army Plaza June 7 (73161).jpg

File:George Floyd protest in Grand Army Plaza June 7 (73161).jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2021 at 21:00:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  •   Oppose way too cluttered Seven Pandas (talk) 00:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment Correct me if one has already been featured, but I think a relatively new photo of a demonstration or similar event will never be featured on this site. Only photos that are already extremely famous iconic historic photos, such as the nurse kissing the soldier at the parade in New York for the end of World War II, might (or might not) be featured. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:13, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "2nd photo", perhaps not, but I'm glad we have it since FPC has arthritis and is becoming stiffer and less flexible with each year. We also manage to scare away new blood with new ideas after only a few FPs. Not good. --Cart (talk) 08:04, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support At first I was skeptical, but I know Ryan wouldn't have nominated this for FP without a reason. And the more I think about, well, it may not be an iconic photo of last summer's protests, at least not yet, but to me it does a great job capturing the moment for the future. We can see that it was a nice late spring day out, that it was during the pandemic, that the protesters were not blocking traffic, that their message was generally positive, and we got the unintended irony of the center of attention being on two young white people while the only black person easily identifiable as such has her back to the camera. And the traffic light makes a nice dividing line in the picture. Protest photos usually aren't going to be natural places for a photographer to show off their compositional skills, and I've seen (and maybe even taken) many a lot worse than this. Daniel Case (talk) 01:42, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose. Idem, per others James2813 (talk) 18:14, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:16, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]