Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gyps fulvus 02.jpg

File:Gyps fulvus 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2012 at 10:10:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 10:10, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 10:10, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 10:24, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- Ok you got it, the bird attitude, and the sharp eye, very good focus point. But to me the composition is average. Upper left bokeh is too much eye catching to me. The crop on the left part of the image too.--Telemaque MySon (talk) 16:50, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yann (talk) 16:56, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tamba52 (talk) 07:12, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cute birdy. --Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 09:18, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ a bit overexposed on the head fur, and noisy on the wings. Beautiful picture though. Sorry, Tomer T (talk) 14:38, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Thanks for the hint. Correction of head fur done. I think, it's better now. --Llez (talk) 15:48, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - It is better. Still noisy on the wings, so I'm ~~Neutral~~. Tomer T (talk) 16:16, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment chromatic noise in bottom third... surprising at ISO 100. Where does it come from and can you correct it? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:11, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I don't know, where it comes from, perhaps the light conditions? I tried already to correct, with little success. Any idea how to correct or can anyone correct these parts? --Llez (talk) 07:04, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 19:14, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:32, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per other "neutral" reviewers...--Jebulon (talk) 09:56, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Info ( Done) I uploaded a new version over the image with a slight reducing of chromatic noise and CA. I think it's better, isn't it? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:39, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Many thanks for your support! --Llez (talk) 15:43, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support after Carschten's edit. Tomer T (talk) 17:15, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support That did the trick. Saffron Blaze (talk) 18:40, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--H. Krisp (talk) 19:45, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:23, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds