Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jatra Posters and a Tram.JPG

File:Jatra Posters and a Tram.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2014 at 07:50:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Jatra posters are visible through a moving tram at Kolkata, India. c/u/n by Dey.sandip -- Dey.sandip (talk) 07:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dey.sandip (talk) 07:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good capture: makes you want to investigate the image. -- Colin (talk) 08:39, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice idea. Nikhil (talk) 03:42, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Info Uploaded a version which is in sRGB color-space. --Dey.sandip (talk) 13:23, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 14:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this execution of the blurred-tram idea so much more than this one. Daniel Case (talk) 16:17, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Info Added Geo-location data. -- Dey.sandip (talk) 16:25, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am afraid that FOP in India does not allow this. Nice image nevertheless. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:04, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Well, I am not sure what the FOP-India mentions. The posters are only a portion of the overall frame (which is essentially a street scene), and no close-ups of only the posters have been captured. The posters are appearing as anyone can see them from a road-side position in a public setting. I am not sure how that violates anything, but as I said, I am not really aware of any issue here. If someone can throw some light on this, or why the image should be disallowed on this ground, I'll be happy to know. -- Dey.sandip (talk) 21:40, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Info Image promoted as QI. Also, checked the conditions of FOP in India. Since in this image, the posters only occupy a part of the frame (which is a street scene) and the posters were visible and accessible in a public setting, there should be no issue with regards to FOP. The image is therefore fine in this regard. --Dey.sandip (talk) 09:25, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment FOP in India allows onlt 3D works. And since the poster is an essential part of this picture, I don't think it can be de minimis. The only valid defense would be that it is not readable, and that it is only a patch of colors... Regards, Yann (talk) 09:53, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment I agree with you that all the details in the poster are not readable. In fact, that was not the intention of the photograph either, for which a close up of only the poster could have been captured. The intention of the photograph was to capture an impression of the shop and the street (with posters adorning it) using a moving tram in the foreground. -- Dey.sandip (talk) 11:04, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Utterly disappointed with the lack of response here -- Dey.sandip (talk) 07:54, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- What kind of response were you thinking FPC could give? IMO Yann killed the nomination and should have sent it to deletion for review by those who (claim to) know these things. Perhaps if it survives deletion it can be renominated without doubts. -- Colin (talk) 08:35, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]