Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Koenigssee - Hirschau Peninsula 01.jpg

File:Koenigssee - Hirschau Peninsula 01.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2016 at 09:28:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Germany
Info Traditional house and alpine landscape on Hirschau peninsula, Königssee, Bavaria. All by me, --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:28, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:28, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ - Pretty. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:42, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~* Support~~ I was wondering if landscape would work better. Good anyway. --Mile (talk) 18:23, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:17, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~* Support~~ INeverCry 19:23, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Nice scenery but the leftmost third is entirely unsharp. Snow fields blown, green on fellside lacks detail. The house is crisp sharp but that does not make the shot outstanding in my eyes, that would require crisp sharp mountains too. Rather focus on the background, the house is still within DoF at f/8 or f/11. Is this 12 mpix frame cropped or downscaled? I’d prefer a landscape framing as well, in case of crop perhaps thats possible. --Kreuzschnabel 06:59, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment A couple of good questions: 1) I chose to take this shot in portrait orientation. This may have been a mistake but I hoped to avoid perspective correction in post processing. Holding my camera perpendicular and still catching a good portion of the sky at the same time was impossible with landscape framing. 2) Why isn't everything crisp? Honestly, I don't know. At f/8, 20mm pretty much everything should be sharp in theory, no matter where the focus actually is (I did focus on the house here). Maybe it was the polarizer? I can't offer any explanation. Still, background sharpness isn't an overly crucial factor here, imo. I still like the picture the way it is. 3). So yes, the picture is a crop, based on a raw file taken in portrait mode. I never ever downscale my pics. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative edit

Info landscape framing - as far as possible (cf. above), pinging Ikan Kekek, Mile, ArionEstar, INeverCry, Kreuz schnabel --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:31, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:31, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree for the f/11 ...but nice composition --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 10:41, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Moving vote here. --Mile (talk) 10:50, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fine! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:56, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support I still like the cropped version, but this is even better. INeverCry 18:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I agree with the others that this is a better composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:17, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 19:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support The other image is rather good, but this is the better one. --Milseburg (talk) 20:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support − Meiræ 00:13, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak party-poop oppose Crop is an improvement and I so want to like this image. But I have two issues I can't make myself get past: First, the unsharpness on the ridgeline. I believe Martin when he says that he can't explain that. And yes, it's not the important part of the image. But we've had similar FPs where there was less unsharpness on distant features, and I don't think "I can't explain this" is an adequate enough answer for me to forgive that.
Second, the WB is a little too cool. I know it's an image with predominantly cool colors, but surely that adjustment could have been made so it doesn't feel so much like it was lit by a giant fluorescent lamp. Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:59, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:55, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support the composition is far better. --Hubertl 20:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:42, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 15:17, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Germany

The chosen alternative is: File:Koenigssee - Hirschau Peninsula 03.jpg