Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Laetiporus sulphureus 2017 G01.jpg
File:Laetiporus sulphureus 2017 G01.jpg, not featured
edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2017 at 16:54:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:54, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:54, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Oppose The harsh flash lighting from above with the shadow is the biggest detriment for me – Lucas 17:35, 21 January 2017 (UTC)- Support - Interesting to look at and well-composed. The lighting is OK, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:03, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:56, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm just not a fan of the lighting... The foreground is harsh and the background has a very vivid shadow that to me makes it feel like it was taken with a pop up flash... EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 19:33, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. lNeverCry 20:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- weak oppose lighting -- Thennicke (talk) 03:56, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- Strong support For me is perfect,absolutely i don't understand where is the problem! For this kind of pics is sure very good --LivioAndronico (talk) 08:36, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose The lighting is indeed not good, those strong shadows just don't help a natural shot Poco2 09:40, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Harsh lighting, per other !votes. It would be understandable if this were something under thousands of feet/meters of ocean, but it isn't. Daniel Case (talk) 04:17, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose harsh light is seldom good and when the subject is almost the same color as the shadows, it gets worse. --cart-Talk 18:42, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
