Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Luebeck-St Marien vom Turm von St Petri aus gesehen-20100905.jpg

File:Luebeck-St Marien vom Turm von St Petri aus gesehen-20100905.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2010 at 00:43:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Mylius - uploaded by Mylius - nominated by Mylius -- Mylius (talk) 00:43, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Info The towers are as skewed as visible, that's not the photographer's fault. ;-) --Mylius (talk) 00:48, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mylius (talk) 00:43, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - nice pic, but (as all too usual!) spoilt by the scaffolding . . . why do they always put some on?!? - MPF (talk) 11:00, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Although it might look like it, the scaffolding is not on the church itself but on a building that's not directly related to it. But I agree, it's become increasingly difficult over the years to find a cityscape without scaffoldings or cranes, no matter where you go in Europe. --Mylius (talk) 16:44, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support maybe a bit overexposed, but nice composition and good quality --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 11:35, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Beautiful, but the building's not entirely shown... --IdLoveOne (talk) 19:01, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

how want you avoid it? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 19:34, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is as much as you get of the building as possible unless you use a plane. The other side, apart from the fact that there's no tower you could photograph from, is covered by even higher buildings. --Mylius (talk) 20:09, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support For image detail quality (though a cutoff subject is generally seen as a deal-breaker as far as I know). --IdLoveOne (talk) 09:00, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose As MPF. Common image, good guality but not enough for FP. --Karel (talk) 21:25, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose tight crop Cathy Richards (talk) 17:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:06, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]