Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:PIA14712 crop.tif

File:PIA14712 crop.tif, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2014 at 15:13:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by NASA - uploaded by G Furtado - nominated by G Furtado -- G Furtado (talk) 15:13, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- G Furtado (talk) 15:13, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Wow factor --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 17:23, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- It's the south pole of a planetoid beyond the orbit of Mars... No f*cking WOW?! we're spoiled rotten by NASA, ESA and others.Kleuske (talk) 16:29, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I am sorry, IMHO I preffer another objects like super nova or god hands. I am not expert in this topic, but I know what is PIA14712, maybe this image has a hight EV and it is important but the image only show a big grey rock. --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 16:48, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It only show a big grey rock because Vesta is a grey rock but although it is a big asteroid it is a small solar system body. May be you will find the wow in the fact that previously to the DAWN mission, this was the best image we had from Vesta so although it is known to exist for more than 2 centuries we finally could see it in detail. Last but not the least, "wow" is of course a very subjective criterion but IMHO is hard to be wowed by a Nebula when there are already 29+5 of them in FP and no dwarf planet, asteroid or even Neptune and Uranus. --G Furtado (talk) 00:20, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I love the photos from NASA, this image has a great story, however, IMHO does not have enough interesting visible elements in color, composition, shape and use of space . Sorry --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 03:23, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support Nice image, high encyclopedic value. Kleuske (talk) 16:29, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 00:55, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Meaningless title. It should be renamed. Yann (talk) 14:47, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 22:19, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]