Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paroi cratère Vésuve.jpg

File:Paroi cratère Vésuve.jpg, withdrawn, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2016 at 17:32:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

I withdraw my nomination

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 17:32, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think this picture has some value in many ways (historical, geological, geographical...), as I took this photograph inside of the crater of the Mount Vesuvius in Italy. So, I took big risks for you, guys. OK, the last eruption was almost 2000 years ago, but who knows ?-- Jebulon (talk) 17:32, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but for me the quality isn't at FP Level. Also the shot for me is very turistic and nothing more --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:13, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I thank you for review, but this is not very useful...--Jebulon (talk) 00:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is fine. The educational value is lowered by the crop without any context (such as a shot of more of the crater hole) or giving an idea of scale (such as a shot that includes people). As an abstract, is isn't interesting enough (such as this section of the crater with different shapes and textures), nor is the lighting special, and there's too much of the lower, less interesting, layers -- a 2:1 ratio crop would help there. -- Colin (talk) 20:32, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for review and very useful explanations.--Jebulon (talk) 00:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry, but per Colin. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I withdraw my nomination I'm afraid I find the three examples of pictures absolutely horrible from all points of view, and I don't understand how they can be compared with the candidate here, but OK, thank you all for reviews. What is funny, is that I was not absolutely convinced myself by this candidacy, but for ther rationales. Very interesting. I'll be back soon ! :)--Jebulon (talk) 08:38, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Jebulon, those examples weren't intended to be examples of FP-quality alternatives. Merely to illustrate each point. They are horrible in many regards. I suspect your memory of how impressive/large this crater is, hasn't translated onto the JPG. Unfortunately, the best view of this crater is likely to come from the air. -- Colin (talk) 09:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - OK, fine. Thanks.--Jebulon (talk) 14:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:17, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]