Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ragdoll Kater, drei Jahre alt, RAG n 21 seal-tabby-colourpoint, Januar 2015.JPG

File:Ragdoll Kater, drei Jahre alt, RAG n 21 seal-tabby-colourpoint, Januar 2015.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2015 at 06:17:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Ragdoll, about three years old, color/pattern Seal Lynx Point - created by BlackIceNRW - uploaded by BlackIceNRW - nominated by BlackIceNRW -- BlackIceNRW (talk) 06:17, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BlackIceNRW (talk) 07:15, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 07:37, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Meow! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:04, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yann (talk) 19:59, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too tight crop, the composition doesn't work for me. Sorry cute cat! --Laitche (talk) 18:56, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not enough eye-catching for me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:05, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just looks odd to me. Only the face is sharp. --Charles (talk) 20:25, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good for me -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:39, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cute, but the chroma noise level is a bit high in my opinion and for the fact that only the face is in focus, it takes up very little of the image. — Julian H.^✈ 06:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think that it is a good capture, the background is not disturbing and the pose is nice, but the area in focus is just too small. According to the EXIF data the lighting conditions were just terrible (ISO2000, f/4, 1/40s) Poc o² 18:17, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The lighting conditions were not easy. That's right. But do not count at the end the result? The light also contributed to the fact, that the cat shows an incredible relaxation. And that the head is in this area of the image plastically in the foreground, makes the image especially from my perspective to an extraordinary photo. Also be accentuated always occurring characteristics of tabby patterns, which generally are limited to the head. So that is highlighted, what is important in this picture; and nothing else. Is this way of working not exactly according to the rules given here? Nevertheless, I thank you particularly for the support, but also for the negative comments, because they show at least clearly an interest for this photo. --BlackIceNRW (talk) 09:07, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too tight at bottom and a bit showy, but not artistic, composition IMO--Lmbuga (talk) 15:54, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 12:17, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]