Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Peter's Basilica, Sant'Angelo bridge, by night, Rome, Italy.jpg
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2013 at 17:35:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 17:35, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support Saint Peter's Basilica, via della Conciliazione, Sant'Angelo bridge, by night. Rome, Italy-- Jebulon (talk) 17:35, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Pretty much all highlight areas are surrounded by a neutral grey area from over-correction of overexposed areas. These would look a lot better if they were just clipped. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 17:55, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- I'll try to correct.--Jebulon (talk) 21:25, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Done Fixed.--Jebulon (talk) 17:43, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- I'll try to correct.--Jebulon (talk) 21:25, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment washed out elements on trees and bushes. --Ivar (talk) 18:00, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- If not, you will claim "noisy ! noisy !". It is a night picture, so compromises are needed.--Jebulon (talk) 21:25, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Overprocessed NR. --Ivar (talk) 18:01, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- If not, you will claim "noisy ! noisy !". It is a night picture, so compromises are needed.--Jebulon (talk) 21:25, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- IMO too much dark, the same image in dusk would be better than this night view, even this one is not so bad like Puente Mong. --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:06, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, this is a night view, indeed ! Same image at dusk will follow, of course I've got it !!...:) --Jebulon (talk) 21:25, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support Nice night shot, high quality with lot of details, good composition and captured mood. --Tuxyso (talk) 22:04, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support per Tuxyso --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:38, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support --JLPC (talk) 09:16, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support nice --Pudelek (talk) 10:17, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment the "blue hour", one would see the outline of the buildings better, so it's too dark --Böhringer (talk) 11:31, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Yes you are right: it is a night shot. Therefore, it is dark (but one can see the line of the horizon nevertheless, as the night is not complete). Please wait a little, you will have soon here a "blue hour" version ! --Jebulon (talk) 12:40, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- CommentBTW, did you have a look on our POTD (16/12) ? Not too dark ? Mmmh? ;)--Jebulon (talk) 12:44, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- do you have a link to it? --Böhringer (talk) 16:16, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- I do not know why you can not tolerate criticism. In this picture you can see the outlines of buildings. With your image the roofs extend into the dark. Otherwise, the picture is very beautiful but too little for my approval. --Böhringer (talk) 15:18, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support per Tuxyso, very nice night shot. --Kadellar (talk) 16:00, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support :-) --XRay talk 18:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support Great image! Halavar (talk) 21:59, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support Nice shot. --Godot13 (talk) 14:10, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support nice, but not good for that piece of tree on the left, but the rest of the picture exceeds every detail --Pava (talk) 10:36, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support well done! St1995 22:24, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support Nice, still there are some flaw is the pixelation in the top left and I'd make it a bit cooler to balance the predominant street lamps yellowish colors, anyhow FP to me Poco2 13:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:47, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:34, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:26, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 05:41, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings