Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sant'Angelo bridge, dusk, Rome, Italy.jpg

File:Sant'Angelo bridge, dusk, Rome, Italy.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2014 at 18:46:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 18:46, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tiber, Sant'Angelo bridge, Saint Peter's Basilica, at dusk, Rome, Italy-- Jebulon (talk) 18:46, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice! --Ivar (talk) 19:42, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose image atmosphere good but not breath taking for me, but strong technical issues here: partial very blurry and not sharp, slobbery impression, see to be a too strong clearance of noise --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:56, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- "slobbery" ? Wow. I forgot that you know very well how to chose the good word...--Jebulon (talk) 20:21, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
look at 100% view at this picture and you´ll see what I mean --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:23, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
you imagine that I nominate here in FPC without opening the image at 100% ? Please.... Anyway, no matter. Remembers me some months ago...--Jebulon (talk) 20:30, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
then you should proof your nomination criteria, this image has a serious problem with the mentioned matters --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:33, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Let's wait what others say. EoD for me with you, thanks.--Jebulon (talk) 21:08, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If you take objective arguments personal don't candidate here pictures. --Wladyslaw (talk) 22:00, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
EoD for me with you, thanks.--Jebulon (talk) 23:00, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support I didn't support the last one because I thought this could look better in less darkness. This is better in my opinion, despite having less detail. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 22:48, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really beautiful scene. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:57, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 10:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:56, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Brilliant! --Pottercomuneo (talk) 16:31, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 08:13, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ArildV (talk) 13:12, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 18:47, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support eeeeh Italy ... heart apart, very nice photo, congratulations. Well cut the trees, which is very rare here on FP --Pava (talk) 19:50, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 22:24, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe agressive denoise (from camera internal filter). Excellent composition --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 12:42, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 13:21, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 19:13, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral pro: nice composition / con: halos around the trees, washed out cupola of st. peters (see notes) - too much noise filter? Is there a chance to fix that? BeBo86 (talk) 08:58, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for review. I understand what you mean. I'll try to fix.--Jebulon (talk) 10:53, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - I've corrected the halos, but there is no gain with the original raw file regarding the cuppola, please notice the distance between the camera and the subject: almost 2 km. The lens is what it is... In spite of the subject, no miracle ! --Jebulon (talk) 20:38, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Halavar (talk) 12:52, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 00:52, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 12:11, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /J e e 02:33, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings