Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sanzieux Orge Cordeau.jpg

File:Sanzieux Orge Cordeau.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2022 at 19:35:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#France
Info This photo seems to break a lot of rules of composition - placing the leading lines in a strange place towards the edge of the frame, for instance - but I find the effect really compelling and I also enjoy the light and the lovely cloud formations. The longer I look at this one the more painterly it seems. Would also be the first FP from this French département. created by MirandaAdramin - uploaded by MirandaAdramin - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:35, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:35, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed very painterly. --Aristeas (talk) 09:10, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:16, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 12:26, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:24, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 19:22, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:46, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I've spent time looking at this since it was nominated. It's got pretty elements and definitely deserves to be considered a QI, but the composition doesn't add to me, so I really don't get why you all think it should be featured. I also don't really find it that painterly: it strikes me as an unusual subject for a landscape, which would at least be likely to include more sky, or otherwise, could start around halfway up this picture frame to feature less of the grass and emphasize the trees, sky and mountains more - in other words, the IMO more interesting parts of the picture. I know one living painter who could make a painting like this, but he would probably create a satisfying composition by using different thicknesses of paint, cuts on the picture frame that create additional straight lines, and some added pieces of canvas or paper in certain places, none of which (or the like) would be done on a relatively unretouched digital photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:43, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 14:05, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Unexceptional to me. Composition with too much grass. Ordinary trees. Not a bad picture but nothing incredible either in this landscape, in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:17, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile Morin. --Fischer.H (talk) 09:41, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:42, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice, but nothing more --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:22, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. I'm sure an actual painting of this scene, if done by a famous French impressionist or in a reasonable (um) impression of their style and technique, might be featurable. But just because it might make a featurable image of a painting does not mean that the scene depicted would make a featurable photograph. Daniel Case (talk) 03:07, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Stepro (talk) 10:30, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Hi, Stepro, you need to give a reason for opposing. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:44, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, you're right of course. The reason is like Basile - it's just an ordinary landscape picture for me. Stepro (talk) 19:53, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Basile Morin. -- Karelj (talk) 19:18, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Ikan and others. — Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 23:12, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:07, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]