Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schokland Netherlands Goat-in-Middlebuurt-02.jpg

File:Schokland Netherlands Goat-in-Middlebuurt-02.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2015 at 07:24:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
A he-goat (Capra aegagrus hircus) in Middelbuurt, Netherlands

All by -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 07:24, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 07:24, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--ArildV (talk) 07:53, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice and cute, but I don't fing here anything more than a good QI. ~~Furthermore I think that the light comes from a wrong direction.--Jebulon (talk) 10:44, 4 October 2015 (UTC)~~I revoke the second part of my first comment, after improvement.--Jebulon (talk) 19:29, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isasza (talk) 17:06, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cute is enough for me here. Daniel Case (talk) 20:50, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:10, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fofo! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:13, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very cute indeed but, sadly, per above.--Fotoriety (talk) 22:25, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per Jebulon. _{unsigned vote by} --Yann

Question The light comes from top left side. In a studio setting we call it hair light to bring up volume and definition. I do not understand, why this kind of light is wrong for a goat but I am interested to hear the explanations. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 04:26, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Agree with opposition, light is problem, head is in shadow. --Mile (talk) 10:09, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I do agree with CEphoto, Uwe Aranas about the lighting scheme which is often used to bring out shapes and give a candid mood. Except I don't find it's successful here. - Benh (talk) 10:22, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Cccefalon with a little bit of edition, this could be away better. This is a very raw edition (3min editing) using your JPEG, but you can get the idea: [1]. And yes, we use this light to do that, but we also use a bright light to highlight the eyes, you can do that also in post production. -- RTA 04:27, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I do agree with Daniel. --Tremonist (talk) 13:44, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done I brightened up the dark side of the moon. Pse, Jebulon, Fotoriety, Yann, Mile, have a look again. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 18:34, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Jebulon (talk) 19:30, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the change, but surrounding light is still too strong. --Mile (talk) 07:17, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose new version is better, but the image as a whole still doesn't really convince me. Sorry, --El Grafo (talk) 12:49, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Cayambe (talk) 14:34, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]