Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SkiLines.JPG

File:SkiLines.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2015 at 02:29:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created by Ptahhotep - uploaded by Ptahhotep - nominated by Rodrigo.Argenton -- -- RTA 02:29, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice concept, some mistakes, a WLE winner... -- -- RTA 02:29, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support ------Isasza (talk) 12:57, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 13:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Needs a description in a second language. A geocode would be nice, too. The crop at the top is not that convincing, but I don't know if I would oppose just because of that. --Code (talk) 15:23, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe the file name is a second language... --Laitche (talk) 11:22, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting, nice idea and good composition :) --Laitche (talk) 11:22, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Laitche. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:28, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fenerli1978 (talk) 12:24, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 18:46, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Why black and white ? Something to hide ?--Jebulon (talk) 19:55, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- WTF??? Photographers could not choose to take a Black and White photo? Holly shit, this is crazy dude... -- RTA 05:55, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - 1) "World is colorful". 2) Please moderate your language (="Holy", with only ONE "l").--Jebulon (talk) 10:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - Although Jebulon is right about the unnecessary language, I love the B&W contrast in this photo. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:02, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      - You don't know how much I moderate my language... ArionEstar, it's not unnecessary, it's a human way to talk, not this robotic way that Wiki like... -- RTA 04:22, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        @Rodrigo.Argenton: Eu particularmente não me importo, mas para evitar transtornos com outros usuários, é melhor você seguir essa linguagem robótica. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 07:46, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Jebulon. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:00, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think this might be a prime example of when B&W has its advantages over colour: This image is all about form and texture, and adding colour would only distract from that. It wouldn't even tell us anything new: We don't need colour to know that the conifers are green, just like we don't need a stereo image to know that the smaller trees in the background are further away. --El Grafo (talk) 08:40, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per El Grafo. Yann (talk) 22:20, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support B&W makes sense here. Shot against the light, the colours would be dull anyway. The shapes are what matters. — Julian H.^✈ 12:03, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 08:40, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural