Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sweet gum seed pod in Green-Wood Cemetery (62398).jpg

File:Sweet gum seed pod in Green-Wood Cemetery (62398).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2019 at 04:33:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
Info created/uploaded/nominated by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 04:33, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 04:33, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:18, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- It looks like a decorative item, it's FP for me. --EATCHA (talk) 10:45, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The background is distracting. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:59, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The background is included in the composition as to say "Look at my background behind my sharp subject". But this building is just blurry and uninteresting in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:02, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it very much, refreshing to see a plant photo without an unrecognizable blur of a background, but some context about the environment instead. The shadows of the branches on the steps provide a nice texture, too. – Lucas 12:03, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose background Charles (talk) 12:52, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I see what you were going for here, and the detail on the seed pod is very sharp. But I do share concerns about the background being distracting. I wouldn't mind this as an FP but I don't feel strongly enough to vote either way. Cmao20 (talk) 13:09, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Yann. The idea is interesting, though (I have way too many unfond memories of stepping on these things barefoot as a kid). Daniel Case (talk) 18:39, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Yann. --BoothSift 05:54, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Yann --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 14:58, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Yann --Cart (talk) 15:53, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:14, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 10:13, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]