Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Banqueting House.jpg

File:The Banqueting House.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2019 at 03:49:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created & uploaded by Saffron Blaze - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 03:49, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 03:49, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I'm inclined to support despite some problems just because it's such a strange composition, but how does a black sheep have a mostly white coat? Could someone please explain? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:08, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sheep come in all versions and combinations of white, grey, black and brown, just like cats, dogs and horses do. See: Sheep breeds. On the island of Gotland, Sweden where I used to live, most sheep have black heads and grey bodies. If you think this looks strange, take a look at Splotch-faced Sheep, Madras Red sheep or Awassi sheep. :) --Cart (talk) 09:40, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Basile and Cart. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:08, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support Slightly oversharpened, but still acceptable post-treatment in my view. Nice light and I like the composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:56, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sky is a little bit noisy, but acceptable. --XRay ^talk 14:31, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:37, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Oversharpened. Sorry. Daniel Case (talk) 02:11, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:19, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support So it is oversharpened. But it is also a great composition with nice light. The two sheep are perfectly balanced and positioned in the frame. -- Colin (talk) 13:43, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel. At 100% it looks artificial like a digital painting or a scene digitally rendered ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 03:44, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose good picture but overprocessed --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 08:08, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:16, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:04, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel. -- Karelj (talk) 17:39, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Oversharpened resulting in strange halos, could be avoided with better processing. --Cart (talk) 13:11, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:57, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]