Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Torre de Collserola 2013.jpg

File:Torre de Collserola 2013.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2016 at 20:03:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Spain
Info created, uploaded and nominated by me. -- Felix König ✉ 20:03, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Felix König ✉ 20:03, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 20:46, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Fine quality, but poor subject matter. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 23:41, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Beautiful picture. I actually find that television tower to have an interesting shape, and its context in the image is certainly interesting to me, but in any case, my philosophy is that taking a really good photo of something that's otherwise ugly or boring deserves at least as much and arguably more respect than taking a really good photo of something that's conventionally beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:35, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:48, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 08:44, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Our FP towers are generally much higher resolution, detailed and sharp. This is only 5.7MP, and not sharp. The composition and lighting are merely functional rather than special so just a QI. -- Colin (talk) 09:25, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overprocessed. Daniel Case (talk) 21:15, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:37, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:07, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:39, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I am with Colin here, --Poc o² 23:09, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Not FP quality (dark shadows, average sharpness at low resolution). — Julian H.^✈ 15:28, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Colin & Daniel. INeverCry 04:07, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Amazing tower, but just an ordinary image. Sharpness and resolution are not very high. As well the composition is unflattering: the white clouds are crossing the white antenna/spire. --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:18, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 22:18, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]