Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:VKG Energia panoraam.jpg

File:VKG Energia panoraam.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2016 at 13:08:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Industry
Info created by Kaupo Kikkas - uploaded and nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 13:08, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 13:08, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Imho perspective distortion needs to be corrected. --Ivar (talk) 15:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Ivar, I'm not sure this is possible or desirable for an aerial photo. The purpose of "correcting" vertical perspective is to give the illusion that one is perpendicular to the verticals, which clearly is not reasonable from a position far above the chimneys. There is a slight tilt on the horizon. -- Colin (talk) 18:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Is the tilt on the horizon OK, or something that should be changed? I think this is a pretty interesting photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any tilt there. Little bit of Earth's curvature, but that's it.

As there seems to be a general lack of industry-related imagery in Commons, I just went and asked for something. Kruusamägi (talk) 23:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I'm going to go ahead and support this nomination. As I stated above, this is interesting and good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support lNeverCry 01:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support, amazing light. The trees are smeared but I personally recognize the challenge of getting distant trees sharp; some blown-out highlights on the smoke and building on the right but it's not too distracting for me. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:09, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A fine job technically, but just way too much going on compositionally for it to be FP for me. Daniel Case (talk) 18:57, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very interesting document, very sharp but I think a serious perspective correction could help for a rectlinear view. Leaning chimneys are bothering me. Furthermore, I think the light of the shadowed part is too strongly "pushed".--Jebulon (talk) 10:26, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Kruusamägi (talk) 16:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /lNeverCry 21:37, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]