Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Varbla kirik - Varbla church.jpg

File:Varbla kirik - Varbla church.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2016 at 18:36:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info all by KristianPikner -- KristianPikner (talk) 18:36, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KristianPikner (talk) 18:36, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 16:15, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support lNeverCry 21:39, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I like the church and the untraily stars in different colors, but I'd like some reassurance about the appearance of the lawn. Does it seem alright to all of you? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:20, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The dark part at the bottom of the spire is completely indistinguishable from the night sky. This should have been taken during the day or blue hour. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There are plenty of images of this church during daytime. The aim of this photo seems to show how does it look like during night together with artificial lighting, that is in place. It would not be right be blame the photographer for the position of lights, that he has nothing to do with. Kruusamägi (talk) 15:47, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

weak support The stars are great and add something special here - but KoH is right about the spire. Any chance to fix that? --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:03, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition is problem. --Mile (talk) 14:03, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose KoH is right. The blue hour would have been better, not only to retain some light/shape to the spire, but also to better balance the artificial light, which can be too bright otherwise. (Btw, it would be useful to also record the details of any stitching that occurred to produce this image, which is >27MP from a 16MP camera). -- Colin (talk) 16:00, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per King and Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 00:28, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I appreciate what you are trying to achieve here, but with parts of the spire and roof lost in the black on black, the church comes off as rather sinister like from an old horror movie, a bluer background would soften that. --cart-Talk 10:41, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 12:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:30, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]