Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View of Puente Nuevo bridge in Ronda Spain.jpg

File:View of Puente Nuevo bridge in Ronda Spain.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2013 at 21:47:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Moroder - uploaded by Moroder - nominated by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:47, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:47, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Belles perspectives!!! -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:19, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support ---Mehdi^Talk 07:32, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow, great view. Tomer T (talk) 07:56, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lighting is harsh, dark shadow in the mid-section -- Dey.sandip (talk) 08:13, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 20:26, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice view, but I dislike the shadow. If the geocode is correct, it was taken towards north-east, so 14:00/15:00 would've been optimal. In full view, again, it looks rather soft. Unfortunately, it's often a problem with your photos, no idea why. --A.Savin 21:01, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I like them that way, I don't sharpen (anyone can do it). Thanks for your comment --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:16, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support In my opinion Wow! there is. Really a great view. Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 21:46, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- As per above + composition unspectacular.Fotoriety (talk) 23:01, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really neat perspective and wow factor outweighs the problems for me. —Mono 18:38, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 19:22, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Yes, the pov is really nice but per A.Savin the image is soft (specific to lens?) while there are post-processing problems: left quarter of the sky is posterized and there are white halos in several areas of high contrast. Sting (talk) 20:51, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pottercomuneo (talk) 20:57, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Dey.sandip --Laitche (talk) 13:51, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support The shadow adds to the relief, and the lighting gives a surreal atmosphere --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:46, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow!--Steinsplitter (talk) 21:53, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 07:17, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 13:50, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Strong banding in left area of the sky, oversharpened and very tight composition around the upper edge. It's a pity because the resolution and the subject are amazing. --Julian H. (talk/files) 14:12, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I believe you consider banding is the pattern of the clouds that day. I have it on several pictures taken that moment. The sharpening is really a matter of taste. I don't like it either (anyone can do it after downloading the picture) but many reviewers keep asking for it... Thanks for the review anyhow --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:29, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Sorry Wolfgang, I have to agree with Julian. Color banding is there, imho it could be fixed with denoising the sky. But the main problem for me is oversharpening. --Ivar (talk) 19:06, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 14:18, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 09:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:46, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 10:51, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural