Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Whilst time is unveiling, Science is exploring Nature CROPPED.jpg

File:Whilst time is unveiling, Science is exploring Nature CROPPED.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Mar 2016 at 16:25:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media#Illustration
Info Image from the Bodleian Library, University of Oxford - edited and uploaded by MartinPoulter - nominated by MartinPoulter -- MartinPoulter (talk) 16:25, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support An unusual medium: a ticket to a museum. Professionally digitised, with tweaks by uploader. Unusual subject matter: personifications of Science, Nature and Time. Remarkable in particular that, in the 18th century, Science was depicted as a woman. -- MartinPoulter (talk) 16:25, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry,nice but too small for this kind of images for me --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support INeverCry 20:32, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I may make up my mind later, but at the moment, I'm unsure, because I like the image but agree that it's pretty small, and maybe if it were bigger, the resolution could be even better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:25, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

*:I'll Support this picture because I like it, but I won't be surprised if it is not featured because of its size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:34, 22 February 2016 (UTC) Changing to Oppose per Adam Cuerden's point. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose [1], the source, has it much larger size if you zoom in. Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose At least it should be the same size as the source. Yann (talk) 09:10, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I thought I'd been working with the highest resolution available. Thanks Adam for correcting me. I will withdraw the nomination. I withdraw my nomination MartinPoulter (talk) 12:01, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. -- Colin (talk) 12:35, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Adam. Daniel Case (talk) 17:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Adam. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:40, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 08:02, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]