Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Xiangmen Gate Suzhou November 2017 002.jpg

File:Xiangmen Gate Suzhou November 2017 002.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2020 at 03:36:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#China
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:36, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:36, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pleasant photo, nice soft light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:05, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose But the light does not ilustrate the subject. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:29, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but I think too much of the main subject is in shadow. Good quality shot and well-composed, but so much of the subject itself is pitch-black. Cmao20 (talk) 15:32, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The light is not optimal, sorry.--Peulle (talk) 15:52, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above --Andrei (talk) 18:18, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support the light accentuates the contrast and highlights the architecture, it works for me. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:56, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per the pro and contra arguments given above. --Aristeas (talk) 09:21, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I'd be OK with the lighting, maybe, if the sky behind it were a more even tone. Daniel Case (talk) 16:36, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Relatively harsh light, too much in the shadow -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:59, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. --Alsakan (talk) 09:42, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 15:25, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]