Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Cueva de Basconcillos el Tozo.jpg

Image:Cueva de Basconcillos el Tozo.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2014 at 23:27:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by mario_modesto - uploaded by mario_modesto - nominated by mario_modesto -- mario modesto (talk) 23:27, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- mario modesto (talk) 23:27, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:20, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak Support Good, but lens flare on the right.--XRay ^talk 08:18, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CommentYes, it flares on the right but it does not affect to the general composition. You should note this is a huge image due to it is a panorama made merging 5 vertical photographs and the position of the sun is perfect to give light to the main entrance of the cave. I had to take a decission: to maintain in darkness the cave with no sun in the composition or wait until the best hour to take the pictures, that is, with light inside the cave (you can check the river entering inside) and the green valley. I preferred the last option.

Oppose Some very significant halos and a band of strange colour and noise that goes through the sky are problematic in my opinion. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 10:02, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per XRay and the noise in the sky. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 10:12, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice but per XRay and Julian -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:38, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CommentI uploaded an update image. What about this one? This is a new panorama correcting the problems of merging of the last image, as well as cropped to avoid those lights. --Mario Modesto Mata (talk) 15:17, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes better but now new lens flares in the valley on the right and IMO the quality in the upper part of the picture is not the best (sky and top of the mountain), however very nice at low resolution -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:51, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose --Andrey Di Silvassex (talk) 08:59, 3 January 2014 (UTC) Not eligible to vote. 10 days and 50 edits required. --A.Savin 10:57, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support /St1995 11:54, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 00:21, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]