Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Pongo pygmaeus (orangutang).jpg
File:Pongo pygmaeus (orangutang).jpg (delist), delisted edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2014 at 21:37:23
- Info Very small, not even sharp at this size (Original nomination)
- Delist -- Yann (talk) 21:37, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep not really unsharp, and the size is not a big issue IMO. -- ChristianFerrer 06:26, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delist per Yann. --Kadellar (talk) 10:44, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delist Pearl Jam --The Photographer (talk) 12:33, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delist While it’s a nice shot the image itself isn’t FP for me. Besides the small size there are JPEG artifacts visible in the fur. --Kreuzschnabel 15:52, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delist Kruusamägi (talk) 22:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
- Strong Keep I think it's very unfair to deselect the photo. The technical standards are very different today than ten years ago almost. And the demands placed on today photos are also considerably higher. Following this motto thousands of other photos should also be deselected. --Steindy (talk) 19:05, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment *sigh* Do we have to go through this again? FP rules clearly say that any image may be delisted as soon as it no longer meets FP criteria (which, of course, rise with the technical possibilities) though it did so when it was featured: Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. So, this is by no means "unfair" but a plain straightforward procedure. Being an FP once does not mean being it for a lifetime. On the last delisting discussion about an image of the same author a few weeks ago, even the author agreed to delist! --Kreuzschnabel 06:13, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- No, we must not. But I can have an opinion on such actions... --Steindy (talk) 12:46, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- Of course you can, just refrain from blaming others to be "very unfair". --Kreuzschnabel 19:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- No, we must not. But I can have an opinion on such actions... --Steindy (talk) 12:46, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delist --Laitche (talk) 20:07, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep -- H. Krisp (talk) 11:24, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delist , btw that's funny :D --Stryn (talk) 17:32, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Result: 7 delist, 3 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. Yann (talk) 14:22, 8 December 2014 (UTC)