Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 04 2014

Consensual review edit

File:Hauskatze an einem Scheunenfenster in Grossarl.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination tired cat --Usien 18:53, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:09, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
      Oppose Too much contrast, overexposed and blurred areas close to the mouth and neck IMO, Sorry. --Hockei 16:55, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support QI to me. --Ralf Roletschek 14:27, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support --Uoaei1 08:05, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Cccefalon 08:38, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Ciampinoi_in_Val_Gardena.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination: Skiing on "Ciampinoi" in Val Gardena in South Tyrol. --Moroder 23:47, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   SupportGood quality. --Cccefalon 07:14, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose not sharp. --Coyau 05:50, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Info At full size the background might be a bit unsharp but I don't think I need to resize the image as someone would suggest, since Wikimedia does it automatically. You don't need to look at full size and everyone can sharpen the image to his demand. If you look carefully at the image you see a lot of detail.Imo most of QI images hardly have this amount of detail --Moroder 21:23, 23 March 2014 (UTC
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   -Ralf Roletschek 09:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Gherdëina_da_Secëda_ju.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Skiing on "Ciampinoi" in Val Gardena in South Tyrol. --Moroder 23:47, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion *  SupportNice! --Nino Verde 07:20, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose not sharp. --Coyau 05:50, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Info At full size the background might be a bit unsharp but I don't think I need to resize the image as someone would suggest, since Wikimedia does it automatically. You don't need to look at full size and everyone can sharpen the image to his demand. If you look carefully at the image you see a lot of detail. Imo most of QI images hardly have this amount of detail --Moroder 21:23, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support ql! --Steinsplitter 09:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ralf Roletschek 15:55, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Awesome image. Great quality. --Arctic Kangaroo 17:09, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Cccefalon 08:29, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Porsche_-_Boxster_-_Mondial_de_l'Automobile_de_Paris_2012_-_202.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination une Porsche Boxster présentée lors du Mondial de l'automobile de Paris 2012. --Thesupermat 10:54, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Bad crop (on top, at the right). CA/WB-issues. Perspective not properly done. --Cccefalon 12:05, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
    pour le "bad crop" ça serait bien que ceux qui rédigent ces commentaires aient en tête que ces photos ont été prises à un salon ou il y a des milliers de personnes qui déambulent autour des voitures exposées elles-mêmes les unes contre les autres, merci. --Thesupermat 21:52, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --Cccefalon 08:40, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Porsche_-_Cayenne_S_Diesel_-_Mondial_de_l'Automobile_de_Paris_2012_-_202.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination une Porsche Cayenne présentée lors du Mondial de l'automobile de Paris 2012. --Thesupermat 10:54, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Perspective not done. Bad cop on top. Wrong WB. --Cccefalon 11:56, 21 March 2014 (UTC) pour le "bad crop" ça serait bien que ceux qui rédigent ces commentaires aient en tête que ces photos ont été prises à un salon ou il y a des milliers de personnes qui déambulent autour des voitures exposées elles-mêmes les unes contre les autres, merci. --Thesupermat 21:52, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --Cccefalon 08:41, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

File:PGO_-_Hemera_-_Mondial_de_l'Automobile_de_Paris_2012_-_003.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Une PGO Hemera présentée lors du Mondial de l'Automobile de Paris 2012. --Thesupermat 08:33, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:36, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
    I disagree, it's tilted. --Cccefalon 12:15, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
      Done--Thesupermat 22:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
      Support ok --Cccefalon 08:35, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Cccefalon 08:35, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

File:2014.03.09.-18-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim-Braune Krabbenspinne-Weibchen.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Braune Krabbenspinne - Xysticus cristatus, Weibchen (female) --Hockei 17:17, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Overprocessed. Please zoom in to confirm. --Arctic Kangaroo 17:58, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
    I don't think so. More opinions? --Hockei 18:22, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
  Info I uploaded a new version with some changes. Please take a look but I still don't agree with Arctic Kangaroo. --Hockei 09:51, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral Too many are blurred. It is advisable to close the diaphragm more. --Archaeodontosaurus 06:52, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support OK, upon second consideration. --Arctic Kangaroo 04:17, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Cccefalon 08:32, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

File:2014.03.09.-17-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim-Braune Krabbenspinne-Weibchen.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Braune Krabbenspinne - Xysticus cristatus, Weibchen (female) --Hockei 17:17, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Overprocessed. Please zoom in to confirm. --Arctic Kangaroo 17:58, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
    I don't think so. More opinions? --Hockei 18:22, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
  Info I uploaded a new version with some changes. Please take a look but I still don't agree with Arctic Kangaroo. --Hockei 09:52, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral Too many are blurred. It is advisable to close the diaphragm more.--Archaeodontosaurus 06:53, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support OK, upon second consideration.--Arctic Kangaroo 04:18, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Cccefalon 08:33, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

File:London MMB I9 Gordon Square.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Gordon Square, London. Mattbuck 08:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:47, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Underexposed and underexposed background (see people) --Lmbuga 17:07, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
    • Sunny day and thick foliage. I think the curves bring out the subject well. There's no overexposure beyond a tiny bit at the bottom on the metal. Mattbuck 23:10, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Exposure is OK for me, but lower part of inscription on the column is definitely unsharp (motion blur or ooF). --Kreuzschnabel 19:36, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Cccefalon 08:31, 3 April 2014 (UTC)