Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 06 2018

Consensual review edit

File:Avenue_Cartier,_Quebec_City_2.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Avenue Cartier, Quebec City --The Photographer 02:14, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. Nice composition, but it's not sharp enough. And there are stitching errors. Please have a look to the second part from the left. --XRay 05:56, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   CommentThere is still a ghost of the smokeing guy that walks behind the left row of cars.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 15:11, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support IMO OK now. Thank you. --XRay 15:53, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 07:54, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Dülmen,_Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche,_Innenansicht_--_2018_--_1329.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Interior of the Holy Cross Church, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:54, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Comment Looks like lens correction is in order. Look at the end of the floor at the bottom versus the middle.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 10:11, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment Lens correction is OK. I've checked perspective and I have made minor fixes. Thank you. --XRay 04:45, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment I'm not getting smart with the prespective distortion on this one. Further opinions please.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 14:05, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Very good use of available light. --Smial 17:08, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support 100% agreement with Smial. -- Ikan Kekek 03:56, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 07:54, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

File:2017_Cour_de_Marbre_du_Château_de_Versailles_P24.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Marble Court of the Palace of Versailles P24 --Lmbuga 20:51, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose I know it's hard to get right, but I think the distortion is just too great on the sides. --Peulle 21:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support. I saw FP with much more distortion. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 21:58, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Spurzem. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:01, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Peulle. Fixable. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:17, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Similar to many other ultra wide angle shots which are FP or QI. --Smial 00:18, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Basotxerri 15:13, 5 April 2018 (UTC)