Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 12 2017

Consensual review edit

File:Tractor_perforando_la_tierra_para_colocación_de_sistema_de_regadíos.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Tractor perforating the land for placement of system of irrigable. --Ivan2010 08:30, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:20, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose (for now) Needs proper COM:Categories and ideally also a bit less saturation. --A.Savin 23:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)   Neutral now --A.Savin 02:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Hoping that the identification of the excavator would be enough. There is no way to know what brand is that tractor, but assuming the main subject is the excavator it is fine to me. Poco a poco 19:31, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 23:23, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Tractor_arando_la_tierra_para_cultivo.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Tractor plowing to the land for cultivation. --Ivan2010 06:06, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support. Good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 12:28, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose (for now) Yes, good quality, but please adequate COM:Categories. --A.Savin 23:43, 7 April 2017
  •   Done. -- Spurzem 08:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)(UTC)
May I disagree?   Not done. --A.Savin 12:47, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
What categories do you want? Perhaps it is possible you add them yourself. -- Spurzem 13:25, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
It's possible, but actually the nominator's / photographer's job. Besides, I don't know anything about the location and I doubt very much that it was taken in Belarus... --A.Savin 13:39, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Belarus is the brand of the tractor. Maybe that the second category which I added is wrong. I will remove it. -- Spurzem 13:57, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Never heard of COM:OVERCAT, sure? --A.Savin 14:44, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
No. I don't know for what it should be necessary. Here I see a good image and I see that it is a tractor made by Belarus. But why will you not help if there is something wrong? -- Spurzem 15:28, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Should Ivan2010 ask me for help, I'll certainly do. But by now there is no reaction and apparently no interest to improve. --A.Savin 20:56, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support After adding some categories (tractor model and tooling). A.Savin you are totally wrong here regarding Ivan's attitude. He speaks no word of English and has limited knowledge about categorization. He was actually so concerned that he desperately contacted you and Spurzem in Spanish with the hope you can understand him. Sometimes a bit of patience is required. Poco a poco 19:23, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support now --A.Savin 02:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 23:22, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Alsterarkaden,_Hamburg_(April_2017).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Alsterarkaden in Hamburg --Frank Schulenburg 19:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Comment looks overprocessed, esp. in the sky; the main problems for QI are noise in the sky and CA. --Carschten 20:53, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support good enough for QI. --Palauenc05 21:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose sorry, no, at least the CA should be corrected and that shouldn't be a big problem (as well as a noise reduction in the sky). --Carschten 21:35, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
    Carschten, thanks for the feedback. I removed the chromatic aberration and reduced the noise. --Frank Schulenburg 15:25, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
    @Frank Schulenburg: sure you uploaded the right version? It looks exactly the same to me. --Carschten 22:30, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
    Yes, I double checked it. For the first version, I had forgotten to enable chromatic aberration correction in Lightroom; for the second version I also skipped some steps in post. --Frank Schulenburg 08:01, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support looks OK now. Juliancolton 22:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 23:21, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

File:2017-03-31_-_Yasmine-Belkaid_-_1340.jpg edit

 

  • Was bedeutet DOF? --Steschke 09:59, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment Es bedeutet "Depth of Field" - sehen Sie bitte mehr hier; scroll zu "Focus" teil.--Peulle 15:24, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment @Steschke: The photo is just not carefully enough retouched and that should be easy to fix.--Ermell 19:08, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Unfavorable shadow, probably caused by frontal flash. Sorry. --A.Savin 02:07, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality now for me.--Ermell 06:46, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ralf Roletschek 10:21, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support. A bit dark but in my opinion good for QI. -- Spurzem 20:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Shadow, per A. Savin. Daniel Case 03:11, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 21:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 23:20, 11 April 2017 (UTC)